French Post-Inscription Study on Sacral Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence
1 other identifier
observational
234
1 country
16
Brief Summary
The aim of this observational study is to evaluate the utilization in the clinical practice, effectiveness, explantation and re-intervention rate, complications and adverse events of InterStim system in patients indicated to Sacral Neuromodulation therapy for fecal incontinence. This study will provide additional data about safety and effectiveness of the usage of InterStim system in fecal incontinence environment and at the same time will confirm that results from clinical trials can be transposed to clinical practice.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2013
Longer than P75 for all trials
16 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 4, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 8, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2017
CompletedJanuary 23, 2018
January 1, 2018
4.3 years
October 4, 2013
January 18, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of implanted patients with a reduction of at least 50% of incontinence episodes per week, compared to baseline.
The primary objective will evaluate the proportion of implanted patients that do not experience any serious adverse event or serious adverse device effect at 4-8 months of follow-up and show a reduction of at least 50% of incontinence episodes per week at the same timeframe, compared to baseline.
6 months (4-8 months)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Reduction of incontinence episodes per week
12 months (9-15 months)
Reduction of evacuations per week
6 months (4-8 months) and 12 months (9-15 months)
Reduction of urgency episodes per week
6 months (4-8 months) and 12 months (9-15 months)
Retention delay
3 months (1-4 months), 6 months (5-8 months), 12 months (9-15 months)
Complications and Adverse Events
3 months (1-4 months), 6 months (5-8 months), 12 months (9-15 months)
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Principal Population
Patients who undergo a definitive neuro-stimulator implantation.
Annex Population
Patients who do not respond to the temporary test for the neurostimulator implantation
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
French subjects affected by fecal incontinence, indicated to sacral neuromodulation therapy.
You may qualify if:
- Patient willing to sign the Data Release Form stating the non opposition to the study conduct;
- Patient able to understand information given by the investigator in terms of data collection and publication;
- At least 18 years old or older.
- Patient indicated to sacral neuromodulation testing with InterStim® system.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient unwilling to comply to data collection and publication rules.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- MedtronicNeurolead
- Medtronic France SAScollaborator
- Medtronic MCRIcollaborator
Study Sites (16)
CHU Estaing
Clermont-Ferrand, France
CHU Grenoble - Hôpital Michallon
Grenoble, France
CHRU Lille - Hôpital Claude Huriez
Lille, France
CHU Dupuytren
Limoges, France
Hopital Edouard Herriot
Lyon, France
APM Hopital Nord
Marseille, France
CHU Nantes - Hotel Dieu
Nantes, France
GH Diaconesses Croix St Simon
Paris, France
Hôpital Saint Joseph
Paris, France
CHU La Milétrie
Poitiers, 86021, France
CHU Rennes - Hôpital Pontchaillou
Rennes, France
CHU Charles Nicolle
Rouen, France
Polyclinique Pays Basque Sud
Saint-Jean-de-Luz, France
CHU Hautepierre
Strasbourg, France
CHU Toulouse - Hotel Dieu PURPAN
Toulouse, France
Clinique St Jean du Languedoc
Toulouse, France
Related Publications (12)
Matzel KE, Kamm MA, Stosser M, Baeten CG, Christiansen J, Madoff R, Mellgren A, Nicholls RJ, Rius J, Rosen H. Sacral spinal nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: multicentre study. Lancet. 2004 Apr 17;363(9417):1270-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15999-0.
PMID: 15094271BACKGROUNDJarrett ME, Varma JS, Duthie GS, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence in the UK. Br J Surg. 2004 Jun;91(6):755-61. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4545.
PMID: 15164447BACKGROUNDUludag O, Koch SM, van Gemert WG, Dejong CH, Baeten CG. Sacral neuromodulation in patients with fecal incontinence: a single-center study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Aug;47(8):1350-7. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0589-9.
PMID: 15484349BACKGROUNDAltomare DF, Rinaldi M, Lobascio P, Marino F, Giuliani RT, Cuccia F. Factors affecting the outcome of temporary sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence. The value of the new tined lead electrode. Colorectal Dis. 2011 Feb;13(2):198-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02088.x.
PMID: 19863601BACKGROUNDMellgren A, Wexner SD, Coller JA, Devroede G, Lerew DR, Madoff RD, Hull T; SNS Study Group. Long-term efficacy and safety of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Sep;54(9):1065-75. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31822155e9.
PMID: 21825885BACKGROUNDAltomare DF, Ratto C, Ganio E, Lolli P, Masin A, Villani RD. Long-term outcome of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Jan;52(1):11-7. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181974444.
PMID: 19273950BACKGROUNDWexner SD, Coller JA, Devroede G, Hull T, McCallum R, Chan M, Ayscue JM, Shobeiri AS, Margolin D, England M, Kaufman H, Snape WJ, Mutlu E, Chua H, Pettit P, Nagle D, Madoff RD, Lerew DR, Mellgren A. Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: results of a 120-patient prospective multicenter study. Ann Surg. 2010 Mar;251(3):441-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cf8ed0.
PMID: 20160636BACKGROUNDTjandra JJ, Chan MK, Yeh CH, Murray-Green C. Sacral nerve stimulation is more effective than optimal medical therapy for severe fecal incontinence: a randomized, controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 May;51(5):494-502. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9103-5. Epub 2008 Feb 16.
PMID: 18278532BACKGROUNDLeroi AM, Parc Y, Lehur PA, Mion F, Barth X, Rullier E, Bresler L, Portier G, Michot F; Study Group. Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: results of a multicenter double-blind crossover study. Ann Surg. 2005 Nov;242(5):662-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000186281.09475.db.
PMID: 16244539BACKGROUNDTan E, Ngo NT, Darzi A, Shenouda M, Tekkis PP. Meta-analysis: sacral nerve stimulation versus conservative therapy in the treatment of faecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011 Mar;26(3):275-94. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-1119-y. Epub 2011 Jan 29.
PMID: 21279370BACKGROUNDMatzel KE, Lux P, Heuer S, Besendorfer M, Zhang W. Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: long-term outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2009 Jul;11(6):636-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01673.x. Epub 2008 Aug 21.
PMID: 18727721BACKGROUNDMeurette G, Siproudhis L, Leroi AM, Damon H, Urs Josef Keller D, Faucheron JL; French Faecal Registry Study Group. Sacral neuromodulation with the InterStim system for faecal incontinence: results from a prospective French multicentre observational study. Colorectal Dis. 2021 Jun;23(6):1463-1473. doi: 10.1111/codi.15507. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
PMID: 33387373DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 15 Months
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 4, 2013
First Posted
October 8, 2013
Study Start
September 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2017
Study Completion
December 1, 2017
Last Updated
January 23, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-01