NCT01957969

Brief Summary

The aim of this observational study is to evaluate the utilization in the clinical practice, effectiveness, explantation and re-intervention rate, complications and adverse events of InterStim system in patients indicated to Sacral Neuromodulation therapy for fecal incontinence. This study will provide additional data about safety and effectiveness of the usage of InterStim system in fecal incontinence environment and at the same time will confirm that results from clinical trials can be transposed to clinical practice.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
234

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2013

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

16 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2013

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 4, 2013

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 8, 2013

Completed
4.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

January 23, 2018

Status Verified

January 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

4.3 years

First QC Date

October 4, 2013

Last Update Submit

January 18, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Proportion of implanted patients with a reduction of at least 50% of incontinence episodes per week, compared to baseline.

    The primary objective will evaluate the proportion of implanted patients that do not experience any serious adverse event or serious adverse device effect at 4-8 months of follow-up and show a reduction of at least 50% of incontinence episodes per week at the same timeframe, compared to baseline.

    6 months (4-8 months)

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Reduction of incontinence episodes per week

    12 months (9-15 months)

  • Reduction of evacuations per week

    6 months (4-8 months) and 12 months (9-15 months)

  • Reduction of urgency episodes per week

    6 months (4-8 months) and 12 months (9-15 months)

  • Retention delay

    3 months (1-4 months), 6 months (5-8 months), 12 months (9-15 months)

  • Complications and Adverse Events

    3 months (1-4 months), 6 months (5-8 months), 12 months (9-15 months)

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Principal Population

Patients who undergo a definitive neuro-stimulator implantation.

Device: Sacral Nerve Stimulation

Annex Population

Patients who do not respond to the temporary test for the neurostimulator implantation

Device: Sacral Nerve Stimulation

Interventions

Also known as: INTERSTIM
Annex PopulationPrincipal Population

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

French subjects affected by fecal incontinence, indicated to sacral neuromodulation therapy.

You may qualify if:

  • Patient willing to sign the Data Release Form stating the non opposition to the study conduct;
  • Patient able to understand information given by the investigator in terms of data collection and publication;
  • At least 18 years old or older.
  • Patient indicated to sacral neuromodulation testing with InterStim® system.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient unwilling to comply to data collection and publication rules.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (16)

CHU Estaing

Clermont-Ferrand, France

Location

CHU Grenoble - Hôpital Michallon

Grenoble, France

Location

CHRU Lille - Hôpital Claude Huriez

Lille, France

Location

CHU Dupuytren

Limoges, France

Location

Hopital Edouard Herriot

Lyon, France

Location

APM Hopital Nord

Marseille, France

Location

CHU Nantes - Hotel Dieu

Nantes, France

Location

GH Diaconesses Croix St Simon

Paris, France

Location

Hôpital Saint Joseph

Paris, France

Location

CHU La Milétrie

Poitiers, 86021, France

Location

CHU Rennes - Hôpital Pontchaillou

Rennes, France

Location

CHU Charles Nicolle

Rouen, France

Location

Polyclinique Pays Basque Sud

Saint-Jean-de-Luz, France

Location

CHU Hautepierre

Strasbourg, France

Location

CHU Toulouse - Hotel Dieu PURPAN

Toulouse, France

Location

Clinique St Jean du Languedoc

Toulouse, France

Location

Related Publications (12)

  • Matzel KE, Kamm MA, Stosser M, Baeten CG, Christiansen J, Madoff R, Mellgren A, Nicholls RJ, Rius J, Rosen H. Sacral spinal nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: multicentre study. Lancet. 2004 Apr 17;363(9417):1270-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15999-0.

    PMID: 15094271BACKGROUND
  • Jarrett ME, Varma JS, Duthie GS, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence in the UK. Br J Surg. 2004 Jun;91(6):755-61. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4545.

    PMID: 15164447BACKGROUND
  • Uludag O, Koch SM, van Gemert WG, Dejong CH, Baeten CG. Sacral neuromodulation in patients with fecal incontinence: a single-center study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Aug;47(8):1350-7. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0589-9.

    PMID: 15484349BACKGROUND
  • Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Lobascio P, Marino F, Giuliani RT, Cuccia F. Factors affecting the outcome of temporary sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence. The value of the new tined lead electrode. Colorectal Dis. 2011 Feb;13(2):198-202. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02088.x.

    PMID: 19863601BACKGROUND
  • Mellgren A, Wexner SD, Coller JA, Devroede G, Lerew DR, Madoff RD, Hull T; SNS Study Group. Long-term efficacy and safety of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Sep;54(9):1065-75. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31822155e9.

    PMID: 21825885BACKGROUND
  • Altomare DF, Ratto C, Ganio E, Lolli P, Masin A, Villani RD. Long-term outcome of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Jan;52(1):11-7. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181974444.

    PMID: 19273950BACKGROUND
  • Wexner SD, Coller JA, Devroede G, Hull T, McCallum R, Chan M, Ayscue JM, Shobeiri AS, Margolin D, England M, Kaufman H, Snape WJ, Mutlu E, Chua H, Pettit P, Nagle D, Madoff RD, Lerew DR, Mellgren A. Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: results of a 120-patient prospective multicenter study. Ann Surg. 2010 Mar;251(3):441-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cf8ed0.

    PMID: 20160636BACKGROUND
  • Tjandra JJ, Chan MK, Yeh CH, Murray-Green C. Sacral nerve stimulation is more effective than optimal medical therapy for severe fecal incontinence: a randomized, controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 May;51(5):494-502. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9103-5. Epub 2008 Feb 16.

    PMID: 18278532BACKGROUND
  • Leroi AM, Parc Y, Lehur PA, Mion F, Barth X, Rullier E, Bresler L, Portier G, Michot F; Study Group. Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: results of a multicenter double-blind crossover study. Ann Surg. 2005 Nov;242(5):662-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000186281.09475.db.

    PMID: 16244539BACKGROUND
  • Tan E, Ngo NT, Darzi A, Shenouda M, Tekkis PP. Meta-analysis: sacral nerve stimulation versus conservative therapy in the treatment of faecal incontinence. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011 Mar;26(3):275-94. doi: 10.1007/s00384-010-1119-y. Epub 2011 Jan 29.

    PMID: 21279370BACKGROUND
  • Matzel KE, Lux P, Heuer S, Besendorfer M, Zhang W. Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: long-term outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2009 Jul;11(6):636-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01673.x. Epub 2008 Aug 21.

    PMID: 18727721BACKGROUND
  • Meurette G, Siproudhis L, Leroi AM, Damon H, Urs Josef Keller D, Faucheron JL; French Faecal Registry Study Group. Sacral neuromodulation with the InterStim system for faecal incontinence: results from a prospective French multicentre observational study. Colorectal Dis. 2021 Jun;23(6):1463-1473. doi: 10.1111/codi.15507. Epub 2021 Mar 12.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fecal Incontinence

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Rectal DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
15 Months
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 4, 2013

First Posted

October 8, 2013

Study Start

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion

December 1, 2017

Study Completion

December 1, 2017

Last Updated

January 23, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-01

Locations