NCT01956162

Brief Summary

Multi-center trial, randomized in 2 parallel groups, open label, with a blinded adjudication committee (PROBE methodology), comparing "Orthèse Diabète" with "conventional" removable devices in terms of healing of ulcers. \- Primary objective: Evaluate the efficiency of "Orthèse Diabète" compared to "conventional" removable devices, in terms of the proportion of diabetic patients whose principal ulcer will heal completely at 3 months.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
118

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2013

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 26, 2013

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2013

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 8, 2013

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2016

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

June 1, 2017

Status Verified

May 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

September 26, 2013

Last Update Submit

May 31, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Evaluate the efficiency of "Orthèse Diabète" compared to "conventional" removable devices, in terms of the proportion of diabetic patients whose principal ulcer will heal completely.

    Evaluated by taking photographs, measuring the ulcer area (using Digital Photo Planimetry DPP and the software Tracer.exe). Full healing defined by the adjudication committee based on the analysis of the photographs.

    At 3 months

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Proportion of patients whose principal plantar ulcer will be fully healed

    At 1, 2 and 6 months

  • Proportion of patients whose all initial plantar ulcers will be fully healed.

    At 1, 2, 3 and 6 months

  • Percentage decrease of the ulcer area

    At 1, 2, 3 and 6 months

  • Time to healing of the principal ulcer

    From the patient's off-loading device delivery visit to the date of healing validated by the adjudication committee

  • Appearance of new ulcers on the affected foot and/or contralateral

    6 months

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Group "Orthèse Diabète"

EXPERIMENTAL

Using "Orthèse Diabète", a new customized removable device with rocker sole for plantar off-loading

Device: Orthèse Diabète

Control Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Using "Conventional devices", removable off-loading systems among the devices available in France

Device: "Conventional" Device

Interventions

The device ensures the discharge of the wound by the excavation of the orthopedic insole facing the wound and the load distribution in the healthy areas.

Group "Orthèse Diabète"

Standard (e.g.: CHUT, BAROUK, Tera-Diab, Sanital, Teraheel, Aircast boots, Walker Stabil D, etc.), or customized (orthopedic insole, Ransart boot, D.T.A.C.P., etc.) removable off-loading systems

Control Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Type 1 or type 2 diabetic patients diagnosed according to the ADA experts consensus \[ADA 1997\]
  • Over 18 years of age
  • With a sensory neuropathy (abnormal 10 g monofilament test, i.e. not perceived at least 2 times in 1 of the 3 areas explored : pulp of the great toe, 1st and 5th metatarsal heads)
  • Without a severe arteriopathy defined by : ABI \< 0,7 and/or TcPO2 \< 30 mm Hg and/or big toe pressure \< 30 mm Hg
  • with one or more plantar ulcerations with an area \> 0,25 cm² or an amputation (toes or transmetatarsal) open or sutured
  • not requiring a contralateral off-loading device
  • Informed about the study and having given their informed and written consent to participate
  • registered with a social security scheme or with the CMU (beneficiary or entitled recipient)
  • having undergone a medical exam
  • not included in another protocol throughout the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Severe skin or osteoarticular infection requiring a parenteral antibiotic therapy or surgery
  • Large ulcer of the ipsilateral leg \> 20 cm2 of area
  • Contralateral above heel amputation
  • Intercurrent disease prohibiting participation in the protocol
  • Weight over 130 Kg
  • Person under tutorship or under curatorship
  • Loss of functional and/or neuropsychological autonomy
  • Pregnant or likely to be pregnant woman

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Bichat Hospital

Paris, 75877, France

Location

Related Publications (14)

  • Malgrange D. [Physiopathology of the diabetic foot]. Rev Med Interne. 2008 Sep;29 Suppl 2:S231-7. doi: 10.1016/S0248-8663(08)73950-X. French.

    PMID: 18822248BACKGROUND
  • Cavanagh PR, Lipsky BA, Bradbury AW, Botek G. Treatment for diabetic foot ulcers. Lancet. 2005 Nov 12;366(9498):1725-35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67699-4.

    PMID: 16291067BACKGROUND
  • Ramsey SD, Newton K, Blough D, McCulloch DK, Sandhu N, Reiber GE, Wagner EH. Incidence, outcomes, and cost of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999 Mar;22(3):382-7. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.3.382.

    PMID: 10097914BACKGROUND
  • Muller IS, de Grauw WJ, van Gerwen WH, Bartelink ML, van Den Hoogen HJ, Rutten GE. Foot ulceration and lower limb amputation in type 2 diabetic patients in dutch primary health care. Diabetes Care. 2002 Mar;25(3):570-4. doi: 10.2337/diacare.25.3.570.

    PMID: 11874949BACKGROUND
  • Detournay B, Cros S, Charbonnel B, Grimaldi A, Liard F, Cogneau J, Fagnani F, Eschwege E. Managing type 2 diabetes in France: the ECODIA survey. Diabetes Metab. 2000 Nov;26(5):363-9.

    PMID: 11119015BACKGROUND
  • Detournay B, Raccah D, Cadilhac M, Eschwege E. Epidemiology and costs of diabetes treated with insulin in France. Diabetes Metab. 2005 Jun;31(3 Pt 2):3-18.

    PMID: 16142041BACKGROUND
  • Malgrange D, Richard JL, Leymarie F; French Working Group On The Diabetic Foot. Screening diabetic patients at risk for foot ulceration. A multi-centre hospital-based study in France. Diabetes Metab. 2003 Jun;29(3):261-8. doi: 10.1016/s1262-3636(07)70035-6.

    PMID: 12909814BACKGROUND
  • Apelqvist J, Larsson J, Agardh CD. Long-term prognosis for diabetic patients with foot ulcers. J Intern Med. 1993 Jun;233(6):485-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1993.tb01003.x.

    PMID: 8501419BACKGROUND
  • Boulton AJ, Vileikyte L, Ragnarson-Tennvall G, Apelqvist J. The global burden of diabetic foot disease. Lancet. 2005 Nov 12;366(9498):1719-24. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67698-2.

    PMID: 16291066BACKGROUND
  • Moxey PW, Hofman D, Hinchliffe RJ, Jones K, Thompson MM, Holt PJ. Epidemiological study of lower limb amputation in England between 2003 and 2008. Br J Surg. 2010 Sep;97(9):1348-53. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7092.

    PMID: 20632310BACKGROUND
  • Resnick HE, Carter EA, Sosenko JM, Henly SJ, Fabsitz RR, Ness FK, Welty TK, Lee ET, Howard BV; Strong Heart Study. Incidence of lower-extremity amputation in American Indians: the Strong Heart Study. Diabetes Care. 2004 Aug;27(8):1885-91. doi: 10.2337/diacare.27.8.1885.

    PMID: 15277412BACKGROUND
  • Fosse S, Hartemann-Heurtier A, Jacqueminet S, Ha Van G, Grimaldi A, Fagot-Campagna A. Incidence and characteristics of lower limb amputations in people with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2009 Apr;26(4):391-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02698.x.

    PMID: 19388969BACKGROUND
  • Potier L, Francois M, Dardari D, Feron M, Belhatem N, Nobecourt-Dupuy E, Dolz M, Bordier L, Ducloux R, Chibani A, Eveno DF, Crea Avila T, Sultan A, Baillet-Blanco L, Rigalleau V, Gand E, Saulnier PJ, Velho G, Roussel R, Pellenc Q, Dupre JC, Malgrange D, Marre M, Mohammedi K; ORTHODIAB study group. Comparison of a new versus standard removable offloading device in patients with neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers: a French national, multicentre, open-label randomized, controlled trial. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 May;8(1):e000954. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000954.

  • Mohammedi K, Potier L, Francois M, Dardari D, Feron M, Nobecourt-Dupuy E, Dolz M, Ducloux R, Chibani A, Eveno DF, Crea Avila T, Sultan A, Baillet-Blanco L, Rigalleau V, Velho G, Tubach F, Roussel R, Dupre JC, Malgrange D, Marre M. The evaluation of off-loading using a new removable oRTHOsis in DIABetic foot (ORTHODIAB) randomized controlled trial: study design and rational. J Foot Ankle Res. 2016 Aug 22;9(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13047-016-0163-4. eCollection 2016.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Diabetic Foot

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diabetic AngiopathiesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesFoot UlcerLeg UlcerSkin UlcerSkin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusEndocrine System DiseasesDiabetic Neuropathies

Study Officials

  • Kamel Mohammedi, Diabetology

    Bichat Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2013

First Posted

October 8, 2013

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion

November 1, 2016

Study Completion

December 1, 2016

Last Updated

June 1, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-05

Locations