Accountability for Cancer Care Through Undoing Racism and Equity
ACCURE
2 other identifiers
interventional
300
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Purpose: African American cancer patients, as compared to their White counterparts, continue to initiate treatment later and remain less apt to undergo complete treatment; fueling worse treatment outcomes including shorter survival. The concepts of "transparency" and "accountability," as mechanisms of systems change have been applied for decades by anti-racism organizations to civil rights and social change. Yet, the application of these concepts to health systems' change and unequal treatment has rarely been done. The Greensboro Health Disparities Collaborative and two Cancer Centers have joined together to specify structures built into cancer care systems that make cancer care vulnerable to institutional racism and investigate how they can be changed to reduce racial inequity in quality and completion of treatment for Stage 1-2 breast and lung cancer patients. Participants: White and African American patients with first diagnosis of Stage 1-2 breast and lung cancer, with intention to treat, and their cancer care staff at 2 cancer centers. The 2 cancer centers are Cone Health Cancer Center (CHCC) in Greensboro, North Carolina and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Hillman Comprehensive Cancer Center in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Procedures (methods): Using a 5-year interrupted time-series, with an embedded randomized control trial (RCT) study design, we will test the effectiveness of the ACCURE intervention components. Having received Institutional Review Board approval for Phase 1, we completed a 5-year, retrospective review of de-identified Electronic Medical Record data to establish a baseline of repeated outcome measures, convening of an expert committee to design the intervention, and design of the real-time, electronic breast and lung cancer registry coupled with dummy testing of the registry system. The randomized trial will compare patients who receive usual care to those who receive visits and calls from a trained ACCURE Navigator, who is well versed in issues specific to breast and lung cancer and trained to serve as a two-way communication bridge to optimize the cancer care system's accountability and transparency for equity in quality of care. Given unintended, but likely variation in implementation of the ACCURE intervention by the two Cancer Centers (at our two research sites), 6 elements of implementation and their potential effect on outcomes will be documented through a process evaluation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable breast-cancer
Started Apr 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable breast-cancer
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 19, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 7, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2018
CompletedAugust 1, 2018
July 1, 2018
4.8 years
September 19, 2013
July 30, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Lung Cancer - Lung Resection Surgery within 4 months of diagnosis or stereotactic radiation Breast Cancer - Completion of surgery, radiation if surgery is breast conserving, and adjuvant chemotherapy (when indicated) within 6 months of diagnosis
Changes in race-specific proportions of quality and completion of breast and lung cancer treatment. Will examine the influence of Quality Improvement/race-specific feedback and the real time registry compared to historical controls using an interrupted time series analysis and will compare the ACCURE Navigator component to Usual Care control groups (the randomized portion of the study).
Chart review 6 to 8 months after patient enrollment and continuous Electronic Health Record (EHR) downloads into the real time registry for the 3 years of follow up.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Adherence to scheduled appointments
Continuous downloads of Electronic Health Record (EHR) data into the real time registry for the 3 years of follow up or death or study withdrawal - whichever comes first.
Other Outcomes (3)
Patient satisfaction with communication
Will be assessed by survey every 6 months for 3 years post enrollment or until death or study withdrawal, whichever comes first.
Trust
Will be assessed by survey every 6 months for 3 years post enrollment or until death or study withdrawal, whichever comes first.
Functional Status
Will be assessed by survey every 3 months in year one then every 6 months in years 2 and 3 or until death or study withdrawal, whichever comes first.
Study Arms (2)
ACCURE Navigator
EXPERIMENTALFor those patients assigned to the ACCURE Navigator, the ACCURE Real-Time Registry is programmed to automatically alert the Navigator when a patient misses a scheduled treatment appointment and to require the Navigator to include details as to how she addressed and resolved that missed appointment, ensuring the ACCURE Navigator's proactive approach to addressing such issues. In addition, a warning message will be produced if no follow-up appointments or procedures are scheduled within 21 days of the index visit.
Usual Care by Cancer Center Care Team
ACTIVE COMPARATORA list of registry warnings about all patients enrolled in the study will be delivered securely to a designated representative at the clinic.
Interventions
The ACCURE Real-Time Registry will automatically alert the ACCURE Navigator to follow a schedule of patient-interactions. The Navigator has been trained to employ the "teachback" method of patient education as appropriate per encounter. For instance: (1) initial face-to-face interaction, after the patient's first visit with the oncologist; (2) telephone call 3 business days after the initial visit; (3) contact the patient 10-21 days after the initial visit; and (4) after treatment has begun, contacting the patient every 8 weeks.It is projected that 50% of the staff will attend the Healthcare Equity Training (HET) and Booster Sessions.
The Usual Care group will receive the support and care that is usually given to patients at their designated cancer center.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- White or African American patients aged 18 or older
- Recently received a first diagnosis of stage 1 or 2 breast or lung cancer
- Patient plans to initiate oncology treatment with curative intent
You may not qualify if:
- Have cognitive impairments or limited English proficiency that would preclude their ability to comprehend survey questions
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hilllead
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
- Partnership Project, Inc.collaborator
- Cone Health System Cancer Centercollaborator
- University of Pittsburghcollaborator
- North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institutecollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Cone Health, Regional Cancer Center
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27401, United States
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Hillman Comprehensive Cancer Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232, United States
Related Publications (1)
Cykert S, Eng E, Walker P, Manning MA, Robertson LB, Arya R, Jones NS, Heron DE. A system-based intervention to reduce Black-White disparities in the treatment of early stage lung cancer: A pragmatic trial at five cancer centers. Cancer Med. 2019 Mar;8(3):1095-1102. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2005. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
PMID: 30714689DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eugenia Eng, MPH, DrPH
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Samuel Cykert, MD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 19, 2013
First Posted
October 7, 2013
Study Start
April 1, 2013
Primary Completion
February 1, 2018
Study Completion
March 1, 2018
Last Updated
August 1, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share