The ICU DElirium in Clinical PracTice Implementation Evaluation Study Screening and Treatment
iDECePTIvE
Improvement of Care for ICU Patients With Delirium by Early Screening and Treatment
1 other identifier
observational
1,500
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Objective: Delirium is an important and frequently occurring complication in intensive care patients. However, screening and treatment of delirium is not in accordance with current national and international guidelines. The first objective of this prospective study is to describe the barriers and facilitators for guideline adherence. Second, investigators will develop a tailored implementation strategy. Finally, investigators will describe the effects of the tailored implementation on the adherence of the guideline in a pilot study. Design: Current practices, attitudes and deviations from a national (Dutch) delirium guideline will be assessed in a prospective before-measurement. Barriers and facilitators will be identified with surveys and focus group interviews. Adherence to the guideline will be studied in a before-after study in 7 ICUs in the Southwest of the Netherlands. Further, the effect of a multifaceted implementation strategy-guided implementation will be assessed with regard to important clinical outcomes, such as mortality and delirium incidence. Population: Professionals (Physicians/intensivists, nurses' and psychiatrists) and ICU patients. Intervention: The delirium guideline of the Netherlands Society of Intensive Care (NVIC) is implemented in this study. Implementation strategies: Barriers and facilitators will be determined in focus group interviews (n=7) with health care professionals resulting in a tailored guideline implementation strategy. In the development of the strategies specific attention will be paid to sustaining the guideline adherence. Main outcome: 1. Current practices; 2. Barriers and facilitators for guideline adherence; 3. Tailored implementation strategy; 4. Percentage of adherence to the guideline (early screening, prevention and treatment of delirium); 5. Effects of implementation on outcomes (economic, mortality, delirium incidence). Data analysis / power: The main effects, guideline adherence, will be evaluated by comparing the before and after measurements. Calculating from 90% power,2-sided alpha=0.01, 231 patients per periods will be sufficient to test the proposed adherence of 85%. Economic evaluation: The economic analysis will be performed from a health care perspective. Investigator will calculate and compare the direct medical costs of usual care (before) and care after implementation of the guideline. Additionally, the cost of the tailored guideline implementation process will be calculated. The economic analysis will be a cost-minimalization analysis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Apr 2012
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 25, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 30, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2016
CompletedOctober 1, 2013
September 1, 2013
3.1 years
September 25, 2013
September 30, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Delirium guideline adherence
1. Current practices; 2. Barriers and facilitators for guideline adherence; 3. Tailored implementation strategy; 4. Percentage of adherence to the guideline (early screening, prevention and treatment of delirium); 5. process evaluation in terms of relevant clinical outcomes, economic assessment, delirium incidence. 6. Re-validation of delirium screening tools (CAM-ICU and ICDSC)
36 monts
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Economic evaluation
1 month
Study Arms (6)
Albert Schweitzer Hospital
Erasmus MC Academic Hospital
Ikazia Hospital
IJsselland Hospital
Maasstad Hospital
Sint Franciscus Gasthuis Hospital
Eligibility Criteria
ICU patients and professionals
You may qualify if:
- Screening delirium by all patients
- Measuring of guide line adherence for all professionals working on the ICU
- Implementation guideline: all professionals
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Erasmus Medical Centerlead
- Albert Schweitzer Hospitalcollaborator
- Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdamcollaborator
- IJsselland Hospitalcollaborator
- Maasstad Hospitalcollaborator
- Sint Franciscus Gasthuiscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Erasmus MC Academic Medica Center Rotterdam
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3000 CA, Netherlands
Related Publications (3)
Smit L, Wiegers EJA, Trogrlic Z, Gommers D, Ista E, van der Jagt M. Risk factors for transitions and outcomes of subsyndromal delirium in the ICU: Post-hoc analysis of a prospective multicenter cohort study. J Crit Care. 2025 Aug;88:155041. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155041. Epub 2025 Mar 6.
PMID: 40054074DERIVEDSmit L, Wiegers EJA, Trogrlic Z, Rietdijk WJR, Gommers D, Ista E, van der Jagt M. Prognostic significance of delirium subtypes in critically ill medical and surgical patients: a secondary analysis of a prospective multicenter study. J Intensive Care. 2022 Dec 20;10(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s40560-022-00644-1.
PMID: 36539913DERIVEDIsta E, Trogrlic Z, Bakker J, Osse RJ, van Achterberg T, van der Jagt M. Improvement of care for ICU patients with delirium by early screening and treatment: study protocol of iDECePTIvE study. Implement Sci. 2014 Oct 2;9:143. doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0143-7.
PMID: 25273854DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Erwin W. Ista, Dr
Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam/ ZonMw
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mathieu van der Jagt, MD, PhD
Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Netherlands
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zoran Trogrlic, MSc
Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, Netherlands
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 4 Weeks
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MSc / PhD-Student
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 25, 2013
First Posted
September 30, 2013
Study Start
April 1, 2012
Primary Completion
May 1, 2015
Study Completion
April 1, 2016
Last Updated
October 1, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-09