A Crossover Study on the Blinding Effect of a New Pragmatic Placebo Needle
Effect of Blinding With a New Pragmatic Placebo Needle: a Crossover Study
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Placebo needle is a useful tool to assess the efficacy of acupuncture. Investigators have applied a new kind of placebo needle in large scale acupuncture clinical trials, which named as pragmatic placebo needle. Compared with other placebo needles used in acupuncture trials, this pragmatic placebo needle shows several advantages: the outlook closer to traditional acupuncture needles, no restriction to needle depth of true needle, simple to manipulate and more economical. However, its blinding effect is not yet validated. The primary objective of this trial is to validate the blinding effect of the new pragmatic placebo needle; the secondary objective is to explore factors influencing the blinding effect of the placebo needles.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2013
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 8, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 23, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 8, 2014
CompletedJanuary 9, 2018
December 1, 2017
4 months
September 8, 2013
May 5, 2014
December 23, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of Volunteers'Perception of Needle Penetration Between the Pragmatic Placebo Needle and Real Needle.
The primary outcome was the proportion of volunteers'perception of needle penetration between the placebo needle and the real needle in the third acupuncture session in each period. LI4, on the dorsum of the hand, between the first and second metacarpal bones, approximately in the center of the second metacarpal bone; RN12, on the upper abdomen,4 cun above the umbilicus,on the anterior midline; BL36, on the back of the thigh,on the midpoint of the inferior gluteal crease; BL25, on the loin, 1.5 cun lateral to the lower border of the spinous process of the fourth lumbar vertebra.
in the third acupuncture session in each period
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Southampton Needle Sensation Questionnaire-Type of Needle Sensation
in the third acupuncture session in each period
Southampton Needle Sensation Questionnaire-Degree of Needle Sensation
in the third acupuncture session in each period
Degree of Acupuncture Pain
in the third acupuncture session in each period
Acceptability of the Acupuncture Needle
in the third acupuncture session in each period
Study Arms (2)
real needle- placebo needle
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received acupuncture with real needle in the first period, and with pragmatic placebo acupuncture needle in the second period.
placebo needle - real needle
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received acupuncture with pragmatic placebo needle in the first period, and with real acupuncture needle in the second period.
Interventions
All acupoints were needled through the pad but just pressed against the skin without penetration by pragmatic placebo needle, while through the pad and into the skin 15 mm by real needle. For each intervention, LI4 and RN12 are needled first in a supine position for 15 minutes; BL36 and BL25 are needled secondly in a prone position for another 15 minutes. After withdrawal of the needle, participants were asked to give answers on perception of skin penetration, needle sensation and acupuncture pain. Acupuncture was given every other day, three sessions for one kind of needle, six sessions in total for each subject. There was a two-day interval between the applications of two kinds of needles.
All acupoints were needled through the pad but just pressed against the skin without penetration by pragmatic placebo needle, while through the pad and into the skin 15 mm by real needle. For each intervention, LI4 and RN12 are needled first in a supine position for 15 minutes; BL36 and BL25 are needled secondly in a prone position for another 15 minutes. After withdrawal of the needle, participants were asked to give answers on perception of skin penetration, needle sensation and acupuncture pain. Acupuncture was given every other day, three sessions for one kind of needle, six sessions in total for each subject. There was a two-day interval between the applications of two kinds of needles.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old;
- with a basic capacity of listening, speaking, reading and writing in Chinese;
- volunteer to join this research and sign the informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- with acute or chronic pain;
- taking analgesics or drugs inducing abnormal sensation;
- with diseases of sensory disturbance or sensory loss;
- with alcohol or drug abuse history;
- serious cardiovascular, cerebral, hepatic, renal, hematopoietic, hemorrhagic or psychiatric diseases;
- diabetes mellitus or dermatological disease;
- women in pregnancy or lactation period;
- cardiac pacemaker carrier, metal allergy or severe needle phobia.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Guang'an Men Hospotal Affiliated to China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100053, China
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Zhishun Liu, Director of the study
- Organization
- Guang'an Men Hospotal Affiliated to China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Zhishun Liu
Guang'an Men Hospotal Affiliated to China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 8, 2013
First Posted
September 23, 2013
Study Start
August 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2013
Last Updated
January 9, 2018
Results First Posted
July 8, 2014
Record last verified: 2017-12