High Definition CT Coronary Angiography Accuracy Trial
Diagnostic Performance of 64 Slice High Definition Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography in Patients With High Risk of Significant Coronary Artery Disease.
2 other identifiers
interventional
302
1 country
1
Brief Summary
CT technology is evolving at a rapid pace, with introduction of multidetector row CT scanners (MDCT) and electrocardiographic (ECG) gating resulting in increasing numbers of heart scans CTCA (CT Coronary Angiography). CTCA provides a noninvasive alternative to conventional invasive coronary angiography (ICA), which is considered the gold standard in the investigation of coronary disease. There has been a gradual increase in the utilization of CTCA for primary assessment of low and intermediate risk patients. However concerns regarding radiation exposure and diagnostic accuracy, especially in the highrisk group, have prevented its widespread dissemination. To achieve best possible temporal resolution (minimize cardiac motion artifacts) and spatial resolution (provide diagnostic accuracy) relatively high radiation exposure is required, as a result of its inverse relationship with image noise and resolution. However radiation (X-ray) is associated with increased risk of cancer in exposed patients and it is therefore essential to continually devise strategies to reduce radiation exposure whilst maintaining image quality. A state-of-art CT scanner (Discovery CT750 HD, General Electric (GE) Healthcare), has been installed at Derriford hospital for further research on CTCA. It uses novel method of scanning, High Definition Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography(HD-CTCA), analogous to high definition television) and image reconstruction (Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction ASIR)as opposed to conventional CT scanners using Filtered Back Projection (FBP)reconstruction. HD-CTCA enables acquisition of sharper images and ASIR offsets the resultant increase in radiation exposure. This is likely to result in images of higher diagnostic quality with an equivalent or slightly lower radiation exposure compared to present technology. Although initial results are encouraging, this needs further assessment before being applied to routine clinical practice. To assess this we have designed a study to perform HD-CTCA on 300 consecutive patients undergoing diagnostic ICA at Derriford hospital, directly comparing the accuracy of HD-CTCA to ICA (presently considered the gold standard). Hypotheses: There is no significant difference in the sensitivity and specificity of HD-CTCA for the detection of coronary artery stenosis of 50% or greater compared to conventional ICA.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
Started Apr 2011
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 3, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 20, 2013
CompletedSeptember 20, 2013
September 1, 2013
1.3 years
September 3, 2013
September 16, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Diagnostic accuracy of HD-CTCA for the detection of at least moderate stenosis (>50%) as defined on invasive coronary angiography in the high-risk target population.
We designed the New Generation Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography (NG-CTCA) study to assess the diagnostic accuracy of high-definition CT with iterative reconstruction in an unselected population of patients suitable for CTCA with either a high pre-test probability of, or established coronary artery disease. Our hypothesis is that NGCT has a comparable diagnostic performance to invasive coronary angiography (ICA), using this as the reference standard
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The diagnostic accuracy of HD-CTCA for the detection of severe stenosis (70%) as defined by invasive coronary angiography.
4 weeks
Other Outcomes (1)
The radiation dose delivered by HD-CTCA
4 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Invasive coronary angiography (ICA)
ACTIVE COMPARATORRoutine diagnostic ICA
HD-CTCA with ASIR
EXPERIMENTALHD-CTCA with Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR)within 4 weeks of routine diagnostic ICA
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients \> 40 years of age.
- Suspected or known coronary artery disease
- Admitted for diagnostic ICA
You may not qualify if:
- Consent cannot be obtained
- Age \<40 years
- New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification - class III or IV heart failure
- Emergency imaging required (not enough time to consider the trial)
- Allergy to iodinated contrast or previous contrast induced nephropathy
- Intolerance to betablockers
- Uncontrolled rhythm disturbances (not suitable for CTCA)
- Serum Creatinine \>200 micro mol/L within two weeks prior to procedure or chronic renal failure on dialysis
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust
Plymouth, Devon, PL6 8BX, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Carl Roobottom, BSc, MBChB(hon), MRCP. FRCR
University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Srikanth Iyengar, MBBS, MS, FRCS, FRCR
University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 3, 2013
First Posted
September 20, 2013
Study Start
April 1, 2011
Primary Completion
August 1, 2012
Study Completion
August 1, 2012
Last Updated
September 20, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-09