Clinical Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Two Teriparatide Formulations: Osteofortil and Forteo
Comparación de la Eficacia y Seguridad clínicas de Osteofortil Respecto de Forteo
1 other identifier
interventional
110
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to compare efficacy and safety of two formulations of teriparatide 20 mcg/day plus calcium and vitamin D in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jun 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 11, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 19, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2014
CompletedJanuary 22, 2014
September 1, 2013
1.3 years
September 11, 2013
January 21, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline in Bone mineral Density at 6 months.
Basal, Six months and One Year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline in P1NP, Osteocalcin, C-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen levels at 3 and 6 months
Basal, 3, 6 and 12 months
Other Outcomes (2)
Change from baseline on bone mineral density asessed by High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) at 6 months
Basal, six months and one year.
Number of patients with elevated serum calcium
Basal, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months
Study Arms (2)
Teriparatide Forteo
ACTIVE COMPARATOR20 micrograms/day plus calcium and vitamin D
Teriparatide Osteofortil
EXPERIMENTAL20 micrograms/day plus calcium and vitamin D
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- I. Female.
- II. Age greater than or equal to 50 and less than 81 years.
- III. Last menstrual period at least one year prior to signing the informed consent.
- IV. Osteoporosis. Defined by the presence of:
- BMD by DEXA with a T-score of -2.5 or lower on lumbar spine or T-score at the lumbar spine, femoral neck or total hip -2.0 or below, together with one or more vertebral fractures documented by lateral spine radiographs.
- V. Have signed the informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- I Bone alkaline phosphatase in the blood above the normal limit without any explanation.
- II. Liver disease (AST or ALT\> 2 x ULN). III. Renal disease (serum creatinine\> 2.0 mg / dl) and / or creatinine clearance \<30 ml / min IV. Hypercalcemia (\[Ca\]\> 10.5 mg / dL). Patients with elevated PTH in the presence of albumin-corrected calcium within normal values can be re-evaluated.
- V. Elevated blood PTH (\[PTH\]\> 65 pg / ml) Patients with elevated PTH in the presence of albumin-corrected calcium within normal values can be re-evaluated.
- VII. • Anemia (hematocrit \<32%).
- VIII. • History of cancer (except basal cell carcinoma) or radiotherapy.
- IX. Severe cardiopulmonary disease, including coronary heart disease: unstable angina, heart failure class III or IV or any other condition that the investigator believes may prevent participation safely and complete the protocol procedures.
- X. Major psychiatric disease that in the opinion of the investigator, would prevent to give properinformed consent or complete the study procedures.
- XI. Excessive alcohol or substance abuse that in the opinion of the investigator prevents giving informed consent or complete proper protocol procedures.
- XII. Congenital or acquired bone disease, other than osteoporosis (including osteomalacia, hyperparathyroidism or Paget's disease)
- XIII. Regarding the history of ingestion of oral bisphosphonates: After assessment of adequate adherence (compliance greater than 75%), if the patient received six months of treatment, she should have a bisphosphonate-free period of six months. If she took more than six months, the bisphosphonate-free period must be 12 months.
- XIV. Current or within the last 3 months before study entry estrogen use, selective estrogen receptor modulators use or calcitonin use in therapeutic doses.
- XV. Current use of systemic corticosteroids (oral or parenteral) for more than 14 days in the last 6 months. Vaginal estrogen and isoflavones are permitted .
- XVI.Current or previous use of teriparatide, other PTH analogues as patches or injectables, strontium, fluorine or any intravenous bisphosphonate therapeutic dose, XVII. Known hypersensitivity to pharmaceuticals derived from bacterial cells. XVIII. Hypersensitivity to teriparatide or to any of its excipients. XIX.Nephrolithiasis or urolithiasis in activity, according to the investigator opinion in the 5 years prior to randomization.
- XX.Inflammatory bowel disease, malabsorption syndrome or any sign of intestinal calcium malabsorption
- XXI. Treatment with androgens or anabolic steroids in the 6 months prior to randomization.
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Bio Sidus SAlead
Study Sites (1)
Instituto de Investigaciones Metabolicas
Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires F.D., Argentina
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 11, 2013
First Posted
September 19, 2013
Study Start
June 1, 2013
Primary Completion
October 1, 2014
Study Completion
November 1, 2014
Last Updated
January 22, 2014
Record last verified: 2013-09