Satisfaction With Nurse Administered Propofol Sedation vs. Midazolam With Fentanyl Sedation for Endoscopy
Nurse Administered Propofol Sedation vs. Standard Therapy for Colonoscopy in Patients With IBD. A Randomised Controlled Study on Satisfaction and Adherence to Treatment Program.
1 other identifier
interventional
130
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Sedation for endoscopy is a service more than a necessity. Therefore it should be patient driven. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) undergoes life long endoscopic control. Therefore, satisfaction with the procedure experience is paramount for patients with IBD. Investigators wish to study the feasibility and the effect on patient experience of two drugs. Propofol administered by endoscopy nurses (NAPS) and conventional therapy with a combination of fentanyl and midazolam. Investigators hypothesize that patients sedated with propofol has a better procedure experience, that a well performed sedation equals a better experience and that NAPS is as feasible as fentanyl with midazolam sedation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jan 2014
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 12, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 4, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2015
CompletedSeptember 29, 2015
September 1, 2015
1.7 years
August 12, 2013
September 28, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Satisfaction
Satisfaction points in a post procedure questionnaire.
Participants will be interviewed when an Aldrete recovery score of 12 is achieved, an expected average of 2 hours after admission
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Pre-disposing factors for satisfaction with procedure and sedation
At admission to the hospital at time 0
Other Outcomes (2)
Correlation between quality of sedation and satisfaction
At the end of procedure, an expected average of 1 hour after admission
Feasibilty of method
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 hours
Study Arms (2)
Propofol
EXPERIMENTALPropofol in refract doses. Induction: 10-60 mg supplemented with 10-30 mg following an age correlated algorithm. Maintenance with refract bolus of 10-20 mg every 1-2 minutes after assessed need and condition
Fentanyl and Midazolam
ACTIVE COMPARATOR0.025-0.05 mg of Fentanyl i.v. minimum 5 minutes before procedure as a single shot. Midazolam 1-2 mg i.v. for induction and 0.5-1 mg i.v. for maintenance after assessing needs and condition
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) or suspected IBD
- Planned Endoscopy
- Candidate for propofol sedation
- willingness to be randomized
- Ability to complete questionnaire
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy to drugs
- American Society of Anesthesiologists Class III
- Body Mass Index \> 35
- Ventricular retention
- Acute condition
- Severe Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Sleep apnea
- Potentially difficult airway or previous difficulty with anesthesia
- Pregnancy
- \<18 years
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Endoscopy, Gastrounit, Herlev Hospital
Herlev, Region H, 2730, Denmark
Related Publications (2)
Jensen JT, Vilmann P, Horsted T, Hornslet P, Bodtger U, Banning A, Hammering A. Nurse-administered propofol sedation for endoscopy: a risk analysis during an implementation phase. Endoscopy. 2011 Aug;43(8):716-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256515. Epub 2011 Aug 2.
PMID: 21811940BACKGROUNDSteenholdt C, Jensen JT, Brynskov J, Moller AM, Limschou AC, Konge L, Vilmann P. Patient Satisfaction of Propofol Versus Midazolam and Fentanyl Sedation During Colonoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Mar;20(3):559-568.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.10.037. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
PMID: 33371995DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jeppe Thue Jensen, MD
Gastroenheden D, endoscopy, Herlev Hospital
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Peter Vilmann, Professor
Gastroenheden D, Endoscopy, Herlev Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 12, 2013
First Posted
September 4, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
September 1, 2015
Study Completion
September 1, 2015
Last Updated
September 29, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-09