NCT01933087

Brief Summary

Infections acquired by patients in hospitals are a major cause of illness and death worldwide, and particularly so in hospitals with very limited resources. Simple hygiene measures, including improved hand hygiene (particularly with increased use of alcohol-based hand rub) by healthcare workers (HCWs) in physical contact with patients, are thought to be amongst the most effective ways of reducing such infections. However, in most hospitals hand hygiene is practiced poorly and improving hand hygiene behavior amongst hospital staff has been found to be difficult. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a multimodal intervention to improve hand hygiene amongst health care workers in accordance with the WHO Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care. The research design is a prospective stepped wedged trial using all in-patient wards in a 1,000 bed hospital located in Northeast Thailand (Sappasitthiprasong hospital, Ubon Ratchatani). A stepped wedge design is a type of cluster randomized controlled trial which is appropriate when there are prior reasons to believe the intervention will be beneficial (as opposed to equipoise) and when it is impractical to deliver the intervention to all study units simultaneously. Both conditions hold here. The intervention will include educational visits to healthcare workers, improved reminders in the workplace, audit and feedback and social marketing with the aim of inducing behavioural and cultural change in relation to hand hygiene. The intervention will be delivered by the infection control team and the infection control ward nurses (ICWNs) who will receive additional training. The primary outcome will be directly observed hand hygiene compliance. Secondary outcomes will include incidence density of hospital-associated bloodstream and urinary tract infections with specified multiply antibiotic resistant bacteria, incidence density of hospital-associated bloodstream and urinary tract infections with non-multiply antibiotic resistant bacteria, total patient mortality rates, and ward-based consumption of alcohol hand rub and soap (a proxy for hand hygiene compliance). Results from this study will be immediately generalisable to other resource-constrained hospitals in Thailand. The research will also have much wider international significance as there have been very few methodologically sound evaluations of the impact of hand hygiene interventions in hospitals. Moreover, the findings will provide essential information for subsequent work on economic evaluations of infection control interventions to determine under what circumstances such interventions are likely to be cost-effective.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
58

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2013

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 27, 2013

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 30, 2013

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 24, 2013

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 2, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 2, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

October 20, 2020

Status Verified

October 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

August 27, 2013

Last Update Submit

October 19, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Hand hygiene,Randonmised Controlled Trials,Hospital

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Hand hygiene compliance amongst healthcare workers having direct patient contact.

    Directly observed hand hygiene compliance data will be collected during all three phases of the study by two observers. Each observer will directly observe healthcare worker compliance with the recommended five moments of hand hygiene in study wards, and a minimum of one hour's hand hygiene observation data will be collected from each ward during each week of the study. Observations will be in accordance with WHO recommendations and make use of the WHO's "5-movements" framework and the standard WHO hand hygiene compliance observation forms.

    16 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Incidence of healthcare-associated bloodstream and urinary tract infections

    16 months

Other Outcomes (4)

  • 28-day mortality following hospital admission

    16 months

  • Ward-level consumption of alcohol hand-rub and soap per occupied bed day (an indirect measure o hand hygiene compliance)

    16 months

  • Knowledge and beliefs of healthcare workers regarding hand hygiene

    16 months

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Control with no hand hygiene promotion

NO INTERVENTION

no implementation of hand hygiene promotion

Hand hygiene promotion

EXPERIMENTAL

Intervention to promote hand hygiene which is based on the WHO multimodal hand hygiene improvement strategy.

Behavioral: Hand hygiene promotion

Interventions

The intervention will adapt from the WHO Multimodal HH Improvement Strategy making use of five components: 1) system change (for example, changing systems to ensure that alcohol-based hand-rub is readily available wherever and whenever needed), 2) training and education, 3) observation and feedback, 4) reminders in the hospital, and 5) a hospital safety climate with the aim of inducing behavioural and cultural change in relation to reduce HCAI and improve HH. The intervention will be delivered to infection control ward nurses (ICWNs) of each ward at each time step by researcher and the infection control team (ICT).

Also known as: Hand hygiene intervention, WHO multimodal hand hygiene improvement strategy
Hand hygiene promotion

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All HCWs, having direct patient contact, in all in-patient wards including Intensive Care Units (ICU) and non-ICUs.

You may not qualify if:

  • HCWs who refuse to sign the informed consent to participate self-administered questionnaire will be excluded from the secondary outcome assessing knowledge and beliefs of HCWs.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2013

First Posted

August 30, 2013

Study Start

December 24, 2013

Primary Completion

May 2, 2015

Study Completion

May 2, 2015

Last Updated

October 20, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-10