Study Stopped
Lack of efficacy of the drug; no safety concern
Biomarker Qualification for Risk of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) Due to Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Pioglitazone in Delaying Its Onset
TOMMORROW
A Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Simultaneously Qualify a Biomarker Algorithm for Prognosis of Risk of Developing Mild Cognitive Impairment Due to Alzheimer's Disease (MCI Due to AD) and to Test the Safety and Efficacy of Pioglitazone (AD-4833 SR 0.8 mg QD) to Delay the Onset of MCI Due to AD in Cognitively Normal Subjects
3 other identifiers
interventional
3,494
5 countries
55
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to qualify the biomarker risk algorithm for prognosis of the risk of developing Mild Cognitive Impairment due to Alzheimer's Disease (MCI-AD), and also to evaluate the efficacy of pioglitazone compared with placebo to delay the onset of MCI-AD in cognitively-normal participants who are at high-risk for developing MCI within 5 years.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Aug 2013
Longer than P75 for phase_3
55 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 26, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 29, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 24, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 6, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 14, 2019
CompletedSeptember 16, 2019
August 1, 2019
5 years
August 26, 2013
July 22, 2019
August 29, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Time to Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment Due to Alzheimer's Disease (MCI-AD) for Placebo-treated, High-risk, Non-Hispanic/Latino Caucasian Participants Versus Placebo-treated, Low-risk, Non-Hispanic/Latino Caucasian Participants
The event definition for MCI-AD was the time in days from the randomization date to the date of the first of two consecutive scheduled visits at which a participant was assessed with a diagnosis of MCI due to AD confirmed by adjudication committee. Here, the time to event was reported as the restricted mean survival time. The restricted mean survival time was defined as the area under the curve of the survival function up to the largest event time.
Baseline to the end of study (approximately up to 5 years)
Time to Diagnosis of MCI Due to AD for Pioglitazone-treated, High-risk, Non-Hispanic/Latino Caucasian Participants Versus Placebo-treated, High-risk, Non-Hispanic/Latino, Caucasian Participants
The event definition for MCI-AD was the time in days from the randomization date to the date of the first of two consecutive scheduled visits at which a participant was assessed with a diagnosis of MCI due to AD confirmed by adjudication committee. Here, the time to event was reported as the restricted mean survival time. The restricted mean survival time was defined as the area under the curve of the survival function up to the largest event time.
Baseline to the end of study (approximately up to 5 years)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change From Baseline for Cognitive Decline on Composite Score on the Cognitive Test Battery for Pioglitazone-treated Participants Versus Placebo-treated Participants in the High-risk Stratum
Baseline and Month 48
Change From Baseline in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living - Prevention Instrument [ADCS ADL-PI]) Between Pioglitazone-treated and Placebo-treated Groups of the High-risk Stratum
Baseline and Month 48
Study Arms (3)
Low Risk Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPioglitazone placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily to participants assigned to low risk group for developing MCI-AD for up to 5 years.
High Risk Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPioglitazone placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily to participants assigned to high risk group for developing MCI-AD for up to 5 years.
High Risk Pioglitazone
EXPERIMENTALPioglitazone 0.8 mg, sustained release (SR) tablets, orally, once daily to participants assigned to high risk group for developing MCI-AD for up to 5 years.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- In the opinion of the investigator, participant is capable of understanding and complying with protocol requirements.
- Signs and dates a written, informed consent form and any required privacy authorization prior to the initiation of any study procedures.
- Is able to physically perform the cognitive tests in the opinion of the investigator and is fluent in the language that tests will be administered.
- Is cognitively normal at baseline, scoring as indicated for the following tests:
- Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR)=0.
- At least one memory test above -1.5 standard deviation (SD) of the demographically corrected normative mean.
- Must score ≥25 on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at the screening visit after the education and age adjustment.
- Is male or postmenopausal female between the ages of 65 and 83 years, inclusive, at time of the Screening visit.
- Has the ability and intention to participate in regular study visits, in the opinion of the Investigator.
- Has a project partner who can separately complete an Acknowledgement Form on his/her own behalf and take part in the study (with the intent to do so as long as the participant is enrolled) to provide information on the cognitive, functional, and behavioral status of the participant and to assist with monitoring of study medication, if needed.
You may not qualify if:
- Has a current diagnosis or history of any type of cognitive impairment or dementia or has a current diagnosis or history of neurological/psychiatric disorder or any other diagnosis that significantly affects cognitive performance (eg, mental retardation, organic mental disorder).
- Has a current diagnosis of significant psychiatric illness, per Diagnostic \& Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition - Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) (or DSM-V when published) (including but not limited to major depressive disorder, anxiety disorders) and is in an acute phase/episode, or the participant has a current diagnosis or history of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.
- Has a glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) \>8.0% at the time of baseline or requires treatment with insulin, triple oral antidiabetic therapy or a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-γ) agonist. The participant should be on a stable antidiabetic regimen for at least 3 months prior to enrollment.
- Has a history of drug abuse (defined as any illicit drug use) or a history of alcohol abuse/dependence within 2 years prior to the Screening Visit.
- Is an immediate family member, testing center employee, or is in a dependent relationship with a testing center employee who is involved in conduct of this study (eg, spouse, parent, child, and sibling) or may consent under duress.
- Has a history of hypersensitivity or allergies to pioglitazone or related compounds.
- Is required to take excluded medications as specified in the Excluded Medications Section.
- Had any of the following values at the Baseline Visit (Visit 2):
- A serum total bilirubin value \>1.5Ă— upper limit of normal (ULN).
- A serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) value \>2xULN.
- Unexplained microscopic/macroscopic hematuria on one repeat examinations within 2 weeks of the initial assessment.
- Is positive for either Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies at the Baseline Visit (Visit 2).
- Has a condition or takes medication that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could interfere with the assessments of safety, tolerability, or efficacy, or prevent the participant from adequately participating in the study or continue for the anticipated duration of the study.
- Has received any investigational compound within 30 days prior to screening or 5 half-lives prior to Screening or is currently participating in another study which entails the administration of an investigational or marketed drug, supplement or intervention including, but not limited to diet, exercise, lifestyle or invasive procedure.
- Has a history of any cancer that has been in remission for less than 2 years from the Screening Visit. Participants with basal cell or stage I squamous cell carcinoma of the skin will be eligible. Participants with history of bladder cancer are not eligible irrespective of the remission status.
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Takedalead
- Zinfandel Pharmaceuticals Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (55)
Unknown Facility
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Sun City, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Long Beach, California, United States
Unknown Facility
San Diego, California, United States
Unknown Facility
San Francisco, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Delray Beach, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Fort Myers, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Lady Lake, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Lake Worth, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Merritt Island, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Orlando, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Port Orange, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Weston, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Decatur, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Elk Grove, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Elk Grove Village, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Unknown Facility
Farmington Hills, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Unknown Facility
Marlton, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
New York, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Concord, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Akron, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Portland, Oregon, United States
Unknown Facility
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Cordova, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Unknown Facility
Middleton, Wisconsin, United States
Unknown Facility
North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
Unknown Facility
Southport, Queensland, Australia
Unknown Facility
West Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Unknown Facility
Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
Unknown Facility
Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
Unknown Facility
Siegen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
Unknown Facility
Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
Unknown Facility
Berlin, Germany
Unknown Facility
Basel, Switzerland
Unknown Facility
Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Hammersmith, Greater London, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
London, Greater London, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Manchester, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Salford, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Blackpool, Lancashire, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Isleworth, Middlesex, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Glasgow, Strathclyde, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Dundee, Tayside Region, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Perth, Tayside Region, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Bristol, United Kingdom
Related Publications (2)
Zou H, Luo S, Liu H, Lutz MW, Bennett DA, Plassman BL, Welsh-Bohmer KA. Genotypic Effects of the TOMM40'523 Variant and APOE on Longitudinal Cognitive Change over 4 Years: The TOMMORROW Study. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2023;10(4):886-894. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2023.115.
PMID: 37874111DERIVEDBurns DK, Alexander RC, Welsh-Bohmer KA, Culp M, Chiang C, O'Neil J, Evans RM, Harrigan P, Plassman BL, Burke JR, Wu J, Lutz MW, Haneline S, Schwarz AJ, Schneider LS, Yaffe K, Saunders AM, Ratti E; TOMMORROW study investigators. Safety and efficacy of pioglitazone for the delay of cognitive impairment in people at risk of Alzheimer's disease (TOMMORROW): a prognostic biomarker study and a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2021 Jul;20(7):537-547. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00043-0.
PMID: 34146512DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Director
- Organization
- Takeda
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Medical Director
Takeda
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 26, 2013
First Posted
August 29, 2013
Study Start
August 1, 2013
Primary Completion
July 24, 2018
Study Completion
September 6, 2018
Last Updated
September 16, 2019
Results First Posted
August 14, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Takeda makes patient-level, de-identified data sets and associated documents available for all interventional studies after applicable marketing approvals and commercial availability have been received (or program is completely terminated), an opportunity for the primary publication of the research and final report development has been allowed, and other criteria have been met as set forth in Takeda's Data Sharing Policy (see www.TakedaClinicalTrials.com for details). To obtain access, researchers must submit a legitimate academic research proposal for adjudication by an independent review panel, who will review the scientific merit of the research and the requestor's qualifications and conflict of interest that can result in potential bias. Once approved, qualified researchers who sign a data sharing agreement are provided access to these data in a secure research environment.