Anal Fistula Plug Versus Endorectal Advancement Flap
AFPERAF
An Outcome and Cost Analysis of Anal Fistula Plug Versus Endorectal Advancement Flap in Complex Anal Fistulae
2 other identifiers
interventional
71
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether anal fistula plug or endorectal advancement flap is more successful in the treatment of anal fistulas and compared both procedures with regards to cost.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2007
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 5, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 29, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2013
CompletedAugust 29, 2013
August 1, 2013
6.3 years
August 5, 2013
August 22, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Anal fistula recurrence rate
One year
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Cost
3 days
Complication rate
3 days
Length of hospital stay
3 days
Independent factors predicting fistula recurrence
One year
Independent factors predicting higher costs
One year
Study Arms (2)
Recurrent anal fistula
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients with a complex anal fistula that recurred after surgery with an Anal Fistula Plug or and Endorectal Advancement Flap
No recurrence of anal fistula
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients with a complex anal fistula that did not develop recurrence after surgery with an Anal Fistula Plug or and Endorectal Advancement Flap
Interventions
Surgical procedure for the treatment of anal fistula with an Anal Fistula Plug
Surgical procedure for the treatment of anal fistula by an Advancement Mucosa Flap
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults (18 years of age or more)
- Single anal fistula
- Surgically treated with anal fistula plug or endorectal advancement flap
You may not qualify if:
- Children or adolescents
- Pregnancy
- Patients treated with setons alone
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Zurich
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, 8091, Switzerland
Related Publications (2)
Adamina M, Hoch JS, Burnstein MJ. To plug or not to plug: a cost-effectiveness analysis for complex anal fistula. Surgery. 2010 Jan;147(1):72-8. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.05.018. Epub 2009 Sep 6.
PMID: 19733880BACKGROUNDClavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.
PMID: 19638912BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Oliver M Fisher, MD
University of Zurich
- STUDY CHAIR
Antonio Nocito, MD
University of Zurich
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2013
First Posted
August 29, 2013
Study Start
May 1, 2007
Primary Completion
September 1, 2013
Study Completion
October 1, 2013
Last Updated
August 29, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-08