NCT01930422

Brief Summary

The primary purpose of the protocol is to evaluate the effect of repeated application for 5 consecutive days of a real tDCS compared to the application of a placebo tDCS (sham procedure) on the evolution of tobacco consumption in the short term between Day 1 and Day 5. The study hypothesis is that a repeated application for 5 consecutive days of a real tDCS on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex region will reduce the craving induced causing a decreased of daily tobacco consumption between Day 1 and Day 5 which can persist at the final visit between Day 15 and Day 20.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
34

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2013

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 20, 2013

Completed
11 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2013

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 29, 2013

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

February 24, 2014

Status Verified

February 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

June 20, 2013

Last Update Submit

February 21, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

Direct transcranial electrical stimulation (tDCS)Sham procedureTobacco consumptionCraving

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Relative change of individual salivary cotinine.

    Outcome measure is assessed at Day1 and Day5

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Relative change of individual salivary cotinine

    Outcome measure is assessed at Day5 and between Day15 and Day20.

  • Exhaled carbon monoxide.

    Outcome measure is assessed at day 0, day 1, day 2, day 3, day 4, day 5 and between day 15 and day 20.

  • Number of cigarettes smoked per day

    Outcome measure is assessed at day 0, day1, day2, day3, day4, day5 and between day 15 and 20

  • Technical feasibility of outpatient

    Outcome measure is assessed between day 15 and 20.

  • Measurement of craving

    Outcome measure is assessed at Day1, day2, day3, day4, day5 and betwenn day 15 to day 20.

Study Arms (2)

Real tDCS

EXPERIMENTAL

Direct transcranial electrical stimulation (tDCS procedure)

Device: tDCS procedure

Placebo tDCS

SHAM COMPARATOR

Sham procedure

Device: Sham procedure

Interventions

The tDCS is a non-invasive neuromodulation method. A stimulator delivers a constant current of low intensity (1-2 mA) applied to the average of two bipolar electrodes placed on the scalp for 20 minutes. This constant current generates a static electric field that selectively modulates the activity of cortical neurones. A tingling sensation under the electrodes appears at the beginning and at the end of stimulation but it is transient and disappears quickly in 30 or 60 seconds.

Real tDCS

The tDCS placebo differs from the real tDCS by the interruption of stimulation after 30 to 60 seconds and reactivation of this stimulation 30 to 60 seconds before the end of the session, which lasted 20 minutes. The tingling felt at the beginning and the end of the session will be the same as those experienced with real stimulation. The electrodes establishment does not differ with respect to tDCS.

Placebo tDCS

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged 18 to 60 years old
  • Smoking ≥ 5 years
  • Smoking ≥ 15 manufactured cigarettes per day or ≥ 10 rolled cigarettes per day
  • Fagerström test ≥ 5
  • Smokers who have at least an attempt to stop of minimum 7 days
  • Written informed consent signed by the patient
  • Affiliated to medical insurance

You may not qualify if:

  • Co-addiction (cannabis, alcohol, other drugs)
  • HAD test: D ≥ 8; A + D ≥ 19
  • Neuropsychiatric disease, considered serious by the investigator
  • Psychotropic treatment (antidepressant, anxiolytic, antipsychotic)
  • Skin scalp dermatosis
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding. Positive pregnancy test.
  • Patient under guardianship, trusteeship or judicial protection

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital, Toulouse

Toulouse, Midi-Pyrénées, 31059, France

Location

Related Publications (77)

  • Organisation Mondiale de la Santé. Rapport de l'OMS sur l'épidémie mondiale de tabagisme 2011, résumé d'orientation. OMS 2011

    BACKGROUND
  • Rapport OMS Mpower 2008.

    BACKGROUND
  • Observatoire français des drogues et des toxicomanies. Les niveaux d'usage des drogues en France en 2010. OFDT Tendances, n°76, juin 2011

    BACKGROUND
  • Le Faou AL, Scemama O. [Epidemiology of tobacco smoking]. Rev Mal Respir. 2005 Dec;22(6 Pt 2):8S27-32. French.

    PMID: 16340832BACKGROUND
  • Hill C, Jougla E, Beck F. Le point sur l'épidémie de cancer du poumon dû au tabagisme. BEH mai 2010; 19-20: 210-213

    BACKGROUND
  • Fuxe, K., Anderson, K., Eneroth, P., 1987. Effects of nicotine and exposure to cigarette smoke on discrete dopamine and noradrenaline nerve terminal systems of the telcephalon and diencephalon of the rat: relationship to reward mechanisms and distribution of nicotine binding sites in brain. In: Martin, W.R., Van Loon, G.R., Iwamoto, E.T., et al. (Eds.), Tobacco Smoking and Nicotine: A Neurobiological Approach. Plenum, New York, pp. 225-262.

    BACKGROUND
  • Pert, A., Clarke, P.B.S., 1987. Nicotine modulation of dopaminergic transmission: functional implications. In: Martin, W.R., Van Loon, G.R., Iwamoto, E.T., et al. (Eds.), Tobacco, Smoking and Nicotine: A Neurobiological Approach. Plenum, New York, pp.169-189.

    BACKGROUND
  • United States Department of Health and Human Services, 1988. The Health Consequences of Smoking: Nicotine Addiction. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC DHHS Publication No.CDC-88-8406.

    BACKGROUND
  • Clarke, P., 1990. Mesolimbic dopaminergic activation: the key to nicotine reinforcement. In: Bock, G., Marsh, J. (Eds.), The Biology of Nicotine Dependence. Wiley, New York, pp. 153-168.

    BACKGROUND
  • Pich EM, Pagliusi SR, Tessari M, Talabot-Ayer D, Hooft van Huijsduijnen R, Chiamulera C. Common neural substrates for the addictive properties of nicotine and cocaine. Science. 1997 Jan 3;275(5296):83-6. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5296.83.

    PMID: 8974398BACKGROUND
  • Wise RA, Bozarth MA. A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction. Psychol Rev. 1987 Oct;94(4):469-92. No abstract available.

    PMID: 3317472BACKGROUND
  • Collins AC, Marks MJ. Progress towards the development of animal models of smoking-related behaviors. J Addict Dis. 1991;10(1-2):109-26. doi: 10.1300/J069v10n01_08.

    PMID: 2065112BACKGROUND
  • Pomerleau OF. Individual differences in sensitivity to nicotine: implications for genetic research on nicotine dependence. Behav Genet. 1995 Mar;25(2):161-77. doi: 10.1007/BF02196925.

    PMID: 7733857BACKGROUND
  • Robinson TE, Berridge KC. The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1993 Sep-Dec;18(3):247-91. doi: 10.1016/0165-0173(93)90013-p.

    PMID: 8401595BACKGROUND
  • Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerstrom KO. The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict. 1991 Sep;86(9):1119-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x.

    PMID: 1932883BACKGROUND
  • Pickens RW, Johanson CE. Craving: consensus of status and agenda for future research. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1992 Jun;30(2):127-31. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(92)90017-7.

    PMID: 1633752BACKGROUND
  • Marlatt, G.A., Gordon, J.R. (Eds.), 1985. Relapse Prevention. Guilford, New York

    BACKGROUND
  • Killen JD, Fortmann SP. Craving is associated with smoking relapse: findings from three prospective studies. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 1997 May;5(2):137-42. doi: 10.1037//1064-1297.5.2.137.

    PMID: 9234050BACKGROUND
  • Shiffman S, Engberg JB, Paty JA, Perz WG, Gnys M, Kassel JD, Hickcox M. A day at a time: predicting smoking lapse from daily urge. J Abnorm Psychol. 1997 Feb;106(1):104-16. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.106.1.104.

    PMID: 9103722BACKGROUND
  • Abrams DB, Monti PM, Pinto RP, Elder JP, Brown RA, Jacobus SI. Psychosocial stress and coping in smokers who relapse or quit. Health Psychol. 1987;6(4):289-303. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.6.4.289.

    PMID: 3301320BACKGROUND
  • Niaura R, Abrams DB, Pedraza M, Monti PM, Rohsenow DJ. Smokers' reactions to interpersonal interaction and presentation of smoking cues. Addict Behav. 1992 Nov-Dec;17(6):557-66. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(92)90065-4.

    PMID: 1488936BACKGROUND
  • Shiffman S, Paty JA, Gnys M, Kassel JA, Hickcox M. First lapses to smoking: within-subjects analysis of real-time reports. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Apr;64(2):366-79. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.64.2.366.

    PMID: 8871421BACKGROUND
  • Brody AL, Mandelkern MA, London ED, Childress AR, Lee GS, Bota RG, Ho ML, Saxena S, Baxter LR Jr, Madsen D, Jarvik ME. Brain metabolic changes during cigarette craving. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002 Dec;59(12):1162-72. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.59.12.1162.

    PMID: 12470133BACKGROUND
  • McClernon FJ, Hiott FB, Huettel SA, Rose JE. Abstinence-induced changes in self-report craving correlate with event-related FMRI responses to smoking cues. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2005 Oct;30(10):1940-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300780.

    PMID: 15920499BACKGROUND
  • Wilson SJ, Sayette MA, Delgado MR, Fiez JA. Instructed smoking expectancy modulates cue-elicited neural activity: a preliminary study. Nicotine Tob Res. 2005 Aug;7(4):637-45. doi: 10.1080/14622200500185520.

    PMID: 16085533BACKGROUND
  • Smolka MN, Buhler M, Klein S, Zimmermann U, Mann K, Heinz A, Braus DF. Severity of nicotine dependence modulates cue-induced brain activity in regions involved in motor preparation and imagery. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 Mar;184(3-4):577-88. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0080-x. Epub 2005 Aug 13.

    PMID: 16133128BACKGROUND
  • Brody AL, Mandelkern MA, Olmstead RE, Jou J, Tiongson E, Allen V, Scheibal D, London ED, Monterosso JR, Tiffany ST, Korb A, Gan JJ, Cohen MS. Neural substrates of resisting craving during cigarette cue exposure. Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Sep 15;62(6):642-51. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.10.026. Epub 2007 Jan 9.

    PMID: 17217932BACKGROUND
  • Lee JH, Lim Y, Wiederhold BK, Graham SJ. A functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) study of cue-induced smoking craving in virtual environments. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2005 Sep;30(3):195-204. doi: 10.1007/s10484-005-6377-z.

    PMID: 16167185BACKGROUND
  • Due DL, Huettel SA, Hall WG, Rubin DC. Activation in mesolimbic and visuospatial neural circuits elicited by smoking cues: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Jun;159(6):954-60. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.6.954.

    PMID: 12042183BACKGROUND
  • Ferguson SG, Shiffman S. The relevance and treatment of cue-induced cravings in tobacco dependence. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009 Apr;36(3):235-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2008.06.005. Epub 2008 Aug 20.

    PMID: 18715743BACKGROUND
  • Tiffany ST, Cox LS, Elash CA. Effects of transdermal nicotine patches on abstinence-induced and cue-elicited craving in cigarette smokers. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000 Apr;68(2):233-40. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.68.2.233.

    PMID: 10780123BACKGROUND
  • Singleton EG, Anderson LM, Heishman SJ. Reliability and validity of the Tobacco Craving Questionnaire and validation of a craving-induction procedure using multiple measures of craving and mood. Addiction. 2003 Nov;98(11):1537-46. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00449.x.

    PMID: 14616180BACKGROUND
  • Heishman SJ, Singleton EG, Moolchan ET. Tobacco Craving Questionnaire: reliability and validity of a new multifactorial instrument. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003 Oct;5(5):645-54. doi: 10.1080/1462220031000158681.

    PMID: 14577981BACKGROUND
  • Berlin I, Vorspan F, Singleton EG, Warot D, Notides C, Heishman SJ. Reliability and validity of the French version of the tobacco craving questionnaire. Eur Addict Res. 2005;11(2):62-8. doi: 10.1159/000083034.

    PMID: 15785066BACKGROUND
  • Heishman SJ, Singleton EG, Pickworth WB. Reliability and validity of a Short Form of the Tobacco Craving Questionnaire. Nicotine Tob Res. 2008 Apr;10(4):643-51. doi: 10.1080/14622200801908174.

    PMID: 18418787BACKGROUND
  • Berlin I, Singleton EG, Heishman SJ. Validity of the 12-item French version of the Tobacco Craving Questionnaire in treatment-seeking smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 May;12(5):500-7. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq039. Epub 2010 Mar 24.

    PMID: 20335281BACKGROUND
  • Koob GF, Sanna PP, Bloom FE. Neuroscience of addiction. Neuron. 1998 Sep;21(3):467-76. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80557-7. No abstract available.

    PMID: 9768834BACKGROUND
  • Afssaps 2003 (RBPC) : stratégies thérapeutiques médicamenteuses et non médicamenteuses de l'aide à l'arrêt du tabac

    BACKGROUND
  • Stead LF, Perera R, Bullen C, Mant D, Lancaster T. Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD000146. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000146.pub3.

    PMID: 18253970BACKGROUND
  • Woolacott NF, Jones L, Forbes CA, Mather LC, Sowden AJ, Song FJ, Raftery JP, Aveyard PN, Hyde CJ, Barton PM. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bupropion and nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2002;6(16):1-245. doi: 10.3310/hta6160. No abstract available.

    PMID: 12269277BACKGROUND
  • Silagy C, Lancaster T, Stead L, Mant D, Fowler G. Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(3):CD000146. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000146.pub2.

    PMID: 15266423BACKGROUND
  • Hughes JR, Stead LF, Lancaster T. Antidepressants for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;(1):CD000031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000031.pub3.

    PMID: 17253443BACKGROUND
  • Moore TJ, Furberg CD, Glenmullen J, Maltsberger JT, Singh S. Suicidal behavior and depression in smoking cessation treatments. PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27016. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027016. Epub 2011 Nov 2.

    PMID: 22073240BACKGROUND
  • Cahill K, Stead LF, Lancaster T. Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;(1):CD006103. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006103.pub2.

    PMID: 17253581BACKGROUND
  • Afssaps - Plan de gestion de risque de la spécialité pharmaceutique CHAMPIX ® Fev 2008

    BACKGROUND
  • Gourlay SG, Stead LF, Benowitz NL. Clonidine for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2004(3):CD000058. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000058.pub2.

    PMID: 15266422BACKGROUND
  • Public Health Service. Treating tobacco use and dependence. Clinical practice guideline. Washington (DC):US Department of Health and Human Services; 2000.

    BACKGROUND
  • Raupach T, Hoogsteder PH, Onno van Schayck CP. Nicotine vaccines to assist with smoking cessation: current status of research. Drugs. 2012 Mar 5;72(4):e1-16. doi: 10.2165/11599900-000000000-00000.

    PMID: 22356293BACKGROUND
  • Cottraux J. Les thérapies comportementales et cognitives, 4ème édition Historique Masson 2004; 2: 20-32

    BACKGROUND
  • Cottraux J. Les thérapies comportementales et cognitives, 4ème édition Des théories de l'apprentissage aux théories cognitives Masson 2004; 3: 35-66

    BACKGROUND
  • Le Foll B, Aubin HJ, Lagrue G. [Behavioral and cognitive therapy to break the smoking habit. Review of the literature]. Ann Med Interne (Paris). 2002 May;153(3 Suppl):1S32-40. French.

    PMID: 12218881BACKGROUND
  • Avis de la HAS, Haute Autorité de Santé Stratégies thérapeutiques d'aide au sevrage tabagique, efficacité, efficience et prise en charge financière. HAS, octobre 2006

    BACKGROUND
  • Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Produits de Santé Les stratégies thérapeutiques médicamenteuses et non médicamenteuses de l'aide à l'arrêt du tabac. Argumentaire, Recommandations de bonne pratique. AFSSAPS, mai 2003

    BACKGROUND
  • Lang N, Hasan A, Sueske E, Paulus W, Nitsche MA. Cortical hypoexcitability in chronic smokers? A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008 Sep;33(10):2517-23. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301645. Epub 2007 Dec 5.

    PMID: 18059439BACKGROUND
  • Brunelin J, Poulet E, Boeuve C, Zeroug-vial H, d'Amato T, Saoud M. [Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in major depression: a review]. Encephale. 2007 Mar-Apr;33(2):126-34. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(07)91542-0. French.

    PMID: 17675907BACKGROUND
  • Meng Z, Liu S, Zheng Y, Phillips JS. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for tinnitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5;(10):CD007946. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007946.pub2.

    PMID: 21975776BACKGROUND
  • Barr MS, Fitzgerald PB, Farzan F, George TP, Daskalakis ZJ. Transcranial magnetic stimulation to understand the pathophysiology and treatment of substance use disorders. Curr Drug Abuse Rev. 2008 Nov;1(3):328-39. doi: 10.2174/1874473710801030328.

    PMID: 19630729BACKGROUND
  • Hoppner J, Broese T, Wendler L, Berger C, Thome J. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treatment of alcohol dependence. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Sep;12 Suppl 1:57-62. doi: 10.3109/15622975.2011.598383.

    PMID: 21905997BACKGROUND
  • Barth KS, Rydin-Gray S, Kose S, Borckardt JJ, O'Neil PM, Shaw D, Madan A, Budak A, George MS. Food cravings and the effects of left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation using an improved sham condition. Front Psychiatry. 2011 Mar 14;2:9. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2011.00009. eCollection 2011.

    PMID: 21556279BACKGROUND
  • Johann M, Wiegand R, Kharraz A, Bobbe G, Sommer G, Hajak G, Wodarz N, Eichhammer P. [Repetitiv Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Nicotine Dependence]. Psychiatr Prax. 2003 May;30(Suppl 2):129-131. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-39733. German.

    PMID: 13130356BACKGROUND
  • Eichhammer P, Johann M, Kharraz A, Binder H, Pittrow D, Wodarz N, Hajak G. High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation decreases cigarette smoking. J Clin Psychiatry. 2003 Aug;64(8):951-3. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v64n0815.

    PMID: 12927012BACKGROUND
  • Amiaz R, Levy D, Vainiger D, Grunhaus L, Zangen A. Repeated high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex reduces cigarette craving and consumption. Addiction. 2009 Apr;104(4):653-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02448.x. Epub 2009 Jan 12.

    PMID: 19183128BACKGROUND
  • Rose JE, McClernon FJ, Froeliger B, Behm FM, Preud'homme X, Krystal AD. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the superior frontal gyrus modulates craving for cigarettes. Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Oct 15;70(8):794-799. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.05.031. Epub 2011 Jul 18.

    PMID: 21762878BACKGROUND
  • Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol. 2000 Sep 15;527 Pt 3(Pt 3):633-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x.

    PMID: 10990547BACKGROUND
  • Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, Priori A, Lang N, Antal A, Paulus W, Hummel F, Boggio PS, Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2008 Jul;1(3):206-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jul 1.

    PMID: 20633386BACKGROUND
  • Gartside IB. Mechanisms of sustained increases of firing rate of neurones in the rat cerebral cortex after polarization: role of protein synthesis. Nature. 1968 Oct 26;220(5165):383-4. doi: 10.1038/220383a0. No abstract available.

    PMID: 4300961BACKGROUND
  • Hattori Y, Moriwaki A, Hori Y. Biphasic effects of polarizing current on adenosine-sensitive generation of cyclic AMP in rat cerebral cortex. Neurosci Lett. 1990 Aug 24;116(3):320-4. doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(90)90094-p.

    PMID: 2173816BACKGROUND
  • Islam N, Aftabuddin M, Moriwaki A, Hattori Y, Hori Y. Increase in the calcium level following anodal polarization in the rat brain. Brain Res. 1995 Jul 3;684(2):206-8. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(95)00434-r.

    PMID: 7583224BACKGROUND
  • Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;117(4):845-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.003. Epub 2006 Jan 19.

    PMID: 16427357BACKGROUND
  • Bikson M, Datta A, Elwassif M. Establishing safety limits for transcranial direct current stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Jun;120(6):1033-4. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.03.018. Epub 2009 Apr 24. No abstract available.

    PMID: 19394269BACKGROUND
  • Poreisz C, Boros K, Antal A, Paulus W. Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients. Brain Res Bull. 2007 May 30;72(4-6):208-14. doi: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.01.004. Epub 2007 Jan 24.

    PMID: 17452283BACKGROUND
  • Fregni F, Liguori P, Fecteau S, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Boggio PS. Cortical stimulation of the prefrontal cortex with transcranial direct current stimulation reduces cue-provoked smoking craving: a randomized, sham-controlled study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;69(1):32-40. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0105.

    PMID: 18312035BACKGROUND
  • Boggio PS, Liguori P, Sultani N, Rezende L, Fecteau S, Fregni F. Cumulative priming effects of cortical stimulation on smoking cue-induced craving. Neurosci Lett. 2009 Sep 29;463(1):82-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.07.041. Epub 2009 Jul 18.

    PMID: 19619607BACKGROUND
  • Boggio PS, Zaghi S, Villani AB, Fecteau S, Pascual-Leone A, Fregni F. Modulation of risk-taking in marijuana users by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Dec 1;112(3):220-5. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.06.019. Epub 2010 Aug 21.

    PMID: 20729009BACKGROUND
  • Boggio PS, Sultani N, Fecteau S, Merabet L, Mecca T, Pascual-Leone A, Basaglia A, Fregni F. Prefrontal cortex modulation using transcranial DC stimulation reduces alcohol craving: a double-blind, sham-controlled study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Jan 1;92(1-3):55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.06.011. Epub 2007 Jul 19.

    PMID: 17640830BACKGROUND
  • Fu M, Fernandez E, Martinez-Sanchez JM, Pascual JA, Schiaffino A, Agudo A, Ariza C, Borras JM, Samet JM; DCOT Study investigators. Salivary cotinine concentrations in daily smokers in Barcelona, Spain: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2009 Sep 3;9:320. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-320.

    PMID: 19728886BACKGROUND
  • Fu M, Martinez-Sanchez JM, Agudo A, Pascual JA, Ariza C, Moncada A, Fernandez E; DCOT Study Investigators. Nicotine depedence and salivary cotinine concentration in daily smokers. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2012 Jan;21(1):96-102. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32834a7e59.

    PMID: 22129659BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Tobacco Use DisorderTobacco Use

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Substance-Related DisordersChemically-Induced DisordersMental DisordersBehavior

Study Officials

  • Rose-Marie ROUQUET, MD

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 20, 2013

First Posted

August 29, 2013

Study Start

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion

February 1, 2014

Study Completion

February 1, 2014

Last Updated

February 24, 2014

Record last verified: 2014-02

Locations