NCT01929369

Brief Summary

This pilot study will provide data to aid in the planning of a follow-up multi-center randomized, controlled trial (RCT). As such, the sample size for this pilot is not driven by formal statistical hypothesis testing. Rather, the sample size of 100 patients (50 per arm) was derived in consultation with the study PI and Co-PI who are experts in vascular surgery, and in particular, the field of hemodialysis access interventions. The results of this pilot study will provide the data that is necessary for generation of specific hypotheses that can then be formally tested in the follow-up RCT

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2013

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2013

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 22, 2013

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 27, 2013

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2014

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

February 20, 2015

Status Verified

February 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

August 22, 2013

Last Update Submit

February 19, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

ESRDCKDAV GRAFTSTHROMBOSED AV GRAFTS

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Re-Intervention Control vs. Test

    Difference in time (measured in days) to AV graft failure after index intervention guided by DSA in the absence (control group) or presence of IVUS guidance (test group), assessed through 6 months post-index procedure

    6 months

  • Define IVUS workflow

    Define IVUS workflow for AV graft evaluation during interventions for access site failure

    Day 0

  • Evaluate ability of IVUS in AV Grafts

    Evaluate the ability of IVUS to identify targets for therapy in poorly functioning AV grafts that are not identified by DSA

    Day 0

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • IVUS vs DSA alone- Decision making

    Day 0

  • % patients requiring re-intervention

    3 months and 6 months

  • Assess CHROMOFLO in AV grafts

    Day 0

Study Arms (2)

CONTROL GROUP

Control group: index intervention guided by DSA; IVUS post-intervention only (50 patients)

TEST GROUP

Test group: index intervention guided by IVUS + DSA (50 patients

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

ESRD PATIENTS WITH THROMBOSED AV GRAFTS

You may qualify if:

  • Patient must be \> 18 and \< 85 years of age
  • Patient or legally authorized representative must be willing to participate and able to understand, read, and sign the informed consent document before the planned procedure
  • Eligible for de-clot procedure or evaluation of slow flow for a failing hemodialysis graft that previously provided access for at least 1 successful hemodialysis session

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient or legally authorized representative cannot or will not provide written informed consent
  • Known metal allergy precluding endovascular stent implantation
  • Known reaction or sensitivity to iodinated contrast that cannot be pretreated
  • Patients who are pregnant or lactating
  • Patients with scheduled kidney transplant within the next 6 months
  • Patients scheduled to switch to peritoneal dialysis within the next 6 months
  • Patients with life expectancy of less than 6 months
  • Participation in any other clinical research study that would interfere with the patient's participation in this study
  • Any concurrent disease or condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make the patient unsuitable for participation in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Regional Medical Center

Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Kidney Failure, Chronic

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Renal Insufficiency, ChronicRenal InsufficiencyKidney DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • John Ross, MD

    Regional Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2013

First Posted

August 27, 2013

Study Start

August 1, 2013

Primary Completion

September 1, 2014

Study Completion

December 1, 2014

Last Updated

February 20, 2015

Record last verified: 2015-02

Locations