W0265-103: A Single-Center, Evaluator-Blinded, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Phase 1 Clinical Trial Evaluating The Phototoxic Potential Of Topically Applied Clindamycin 1.0% - Tretinoin 0.025% Gel (Ct Gel) In Healthy Volunteers
A Single-Center, Evaluator-Blinded, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Phase 1 Clinical Trial Evaluating The Phototoxic Potential Of Topically Applied Clindamycin 1.0% - Tretinoin 0.025% Gel (Ct Gel) In Healthy Volunteers
1 other identifier
interventional
37
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Clindamycin 1.0% - tretinoin 0.025% gel (CT Gel) is a reformulation of VELAC Gel that contains the same active ingredients (clindamycin 1.0% and tretinoin 0.025%) in a modified vehicle. This was a single-center, evaluator-blinded, randomized, placebo (vehicle)-controlled phase 1 study to evaluate the phototoxic potential of CT Gel using 24 hour single applications of 3 sets of 3 study patches. The study expected to enroll approximately 40 healthy adult volunteers. Each set of study patches consisted of a CT Gel patch, a vehicle gel patch, and a blank patch (did not contain CT Gel or vehicle gel). After concurrent 24-hour single applications of all 9 patches, 1 set of patches (set A) was removed, and those sites were irradiated with 16 joules/cm2 of ultraviolet A light (UVA) and 0.75 minimal erythema dose (MED) with UVA/ultraviolet B light (UVB). The second set of patches (set B) was removed, and those sites were irradiated with 16 joules/cm2 of UVA, 0.75 MED with UVB/UVA, followed by 15 joules/cm2 of visible light (VIS). The third set of patches (set C) was then removed, and those sites served as a non irradiated control. Inflammatory responses and other cutaneous effects were scored 1 hour after patch removal and during follow-up visits at 24, 48, and 72 hours after patch removal.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1
Started Dec 2008
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 8, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 19, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 19, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 22, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 27, 2013
CompletedJuly 18, 2017
July 1, 2017
11 days
August 22, 2013
July 13, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Inflammatory responses (erythema and local skin reactions) or superficial effects (if observed) will be scored according to the erythema, local skin reaction, and superficial effects grading scales.
In cases where the patch area is larger than the irradiated area, only the irradiated areas will be scored unless reactions outside the irradiated area exhibit unusual responses. Scores represent the presence of clinically significant effects on at least 25% of the test site. Questionable, barely perceptible, or minimal reactions involving less than 25% of the test site will not be considered significant.
6 - 11 days
Study Arms (3)
CT Gel patch
EXPERIMENTALCT Gel is a reformulation of VELAC Gel that contains the same active ingredients (clindamycin 1% and tretinoin 0.025%) in a modified vehicle. The test article was placed on a separate occlusive patch at volumes of 200 µL per patch.
Vehicle gel patch
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe test article was placed on a separate occlusive patch at volumes of 200 µL per patch.
Blank patch
EXPERIMENTALBlank patches did not contain CT Gel or vehicle gel.
Interventions
Three CT Gel patches were concurrently applied to designated test sites by trained technicians and held in place with hypoallergenic tape. Patches were prepared no longer than 30 minutes prior to application to study subjects. A minimum distance of ¾ of an inch from patch pad to patch pad was maintained on a subject's back. Approximately 24 ±1 hours after patch application, test patches were removed by trained technicians. Patch sites were evaluated for signs of inflammation according to procedures.
Three vehicle gel patches were concurrently applied to designated test sites by trained technicians and held in place with hypoallergenic tape. Patches were prepared no longer than 30 minutes prior to application to study subjects. A minimum distance of ¾ of an inch from patch pad to patch pad was maintained on a subject's back. Approximately 24 ±1 hours after patch application, test patches were removed by trained technicians. Patch sites were evaluated for signs of inflammation according to procedures. 2. Vehicle gel contained the identical ingredients and packaging as CT Gel but without the active ingredients. All vehicle gel used during the study was from batch ZLU C.
Three blank patches were concurrently applied to designated test sites by trained technicians and held in place with hypoallergenic tape. Patches were prepared no longer than 30 minutes prior to application to study subjects. A minimum distance of ¾ of an inch from patch pad to patch pad was maintained on a subject's back. Approximately 24 ±1 hours after patch application, test patches were removed by trained technicians. Patch sites were evaluated for signs of inflammation according to procedures. 3. Occlusive patches consisted of a non-woven cotton pad (Webril \[approximately 2 cm x 2 cm\]) covered and secured on all sides by an occlusive hypoallergenic tape (approximately 4 cm x 4 cm).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The capability of understanding and providing signed and dated written voluntary informed consent (and any local or national authorization requirements) before any protocol-specific procedures were performed.
- Male or female subjects aged from 18 to 65 years, inclusive, at time of consent.
- The ability to complete the study and to comply with study instructions.
- Possessed Fitzpatrick skin type I (always burns easily; never tans), II (always burns easily; tans minimally), or III (burns moderately; tans gradually) that would not interfere with the reading of any skin responses. Determination of skin types was based on sunburn and tanning histories, as well as subjects' opinions of their responses to the first 30 to 45 minutes of sun exposure.
- Sexually active females of childbearing potential who agreed to use a medically acceptable method of contraception while receiving protocol-assigned product. A woman of childbearing potential was defined as one who was biologically capable of becoming pregnant, including perimenopausal women who were less than 2 years from their last menses. Acceptable contraceptive methods included the following:
- Hormonal contraception, including oral, injectable, or implantable methods started at least 2 months prior to screening. If hormonal contraception was started less than 2 months prior to screening, then a form of non-hormonal contraception was to have been added until the third continuous month of hormonal contraception was completed.
- Two forms of non hormonal contraception, including intrauterine devices or properly used barrier methods (eg, male or female condoms, diaphragm, or cervical cap). Subjects with surgical sterilization, including tubal ligation or partner's vasectomy, were to have used a form of non-hormonal contraception. A barrier method or sterilization plus spermatocide were acceptable.
- Women who were not currently sexually active or lactating agreed to use a medically accepted method of contraception if she became sexually active while participating in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Currently diagnosed with cancer or had a previous history of cancer, including skin cancer, or severe photodamaged skin. Severe photodamaged skin was characterized by yellow-gray color, wrinkles with no visible normal skin, and prior skin malignancies.
- Female subjects who were pregnant, attempting to become pregnant, or breast feeding.
- Received any investigational drug within 4 weeks of study day 1 or who were scheduled to receive an investigational drug other than the study product during the study.
- Used contraindicated prescription drugs within 4 weeks or 5 half-lives, whichever was longer, of first dose of study product, unless agreed as not clinically relevant by the principal investigator and the project physician.
- Participated in a previous study of the same study product.
- Current use of any medication which, in the opinion of the investigator, may have affected the evaluation of the study product or placed the subject at undue risk.
- Suffered from any disease or condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, may have affected the evaluation of the study product or placed the subject at undue risk.
- Any major illness within 30 days before the screening examination.
- Considered immunocompromised or using immunosuppressant drugs.
- Clinically relevant history of or current evidence of abuse of alcohol or other drugs.
- History of known or suspected intolerance to any of the ingredients of the study products (ie, test and comparator products), to the hypoallergenic tape, or to the cotton patches.
- Clinically relevant history or presence of respiratory (including chronic asthma requiring repetitive drug interventions), gastrointestinal, renal, hepatic, hematological, lymphatic, neurological, cardiovascular, psychiatric, musculoskeletal, genitourinary, immunological, dermatological, or connective tissue diseases or disorders.
- Considered unable or unlikely to attend the necessary visits.
- History of severe reactions from exposure to sunlight, including previous experience with photoallergy, solar urticaria, polymorphous light eruptions, or other photo exacerbated systemic diseases.
- Current use or expected use of photosensitizing medications (over-the-counter and prescription), herbal supplements, or any use of a known photosensitizing material.
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Stiefel, a GSK Companylead
- GlaxoSmithKlinecollaborator
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
GSK Clinical Trials
GlaxoSmithKline
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 22, 2013
First Posted
August 27, 2013
Study Start
December 8, 2008
Primary Completion
December 19, 2008
Study Completion
December 19, 2008
Last Updated
July 18, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07