Improving Life Chances of Disadvantaged Youth: Testing Best-Practice Academic vs. Non-Academic Supports
2 other identifiers
interventional
5,344
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to learn more about the most cost-effective way to improve the long-term life outcomes of disadvantaged youth, by comparing best practice academic supports to best-practice non-academic supports, and learning more about whether investing in both simultaneously has synergistic (more than additive) effects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 15, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 22, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2018
CompletedJuly 11, 2017
July 1, 2017
4.8 years
August 15, 2013
July 7, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in Violent Crime Arrests
Number of violent crime arrests, obtained from Chicago Police Department and Illinois State Police administrative databases
1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, 5-year
Change in other arrests (property, drug, and other)
Number of non-violent crime arrests, including property crimes, drug crimes, and other crimes, obtained from Chicago Police Department and Illinois State Police administrative databases
1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, 5-year
Change in index of CPS schooling outcomes
Index of standardized (in Z-score form) outcomes for school persistence, absences, student misconducts, course grades
1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change in absentee Rate
1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, 5-year
Change in Student Misconduct
1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, 5-year
Change in Total Courses Failed
1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 4-year, 5-year
Change in School persistence
1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, 5 years
Change in Math achievement
2 years
Study Arms (4)
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONThese youth will not receive the non-academic cognitive behavioral programming nor the intensive academic mathematics tutoring.
BAM Group Therapy & Match Math Tutoring
EXPERIMENTALThese youth will receive both the non-academic cognitive behavioral programming and the intensive academic mathematics tutoring.
BAM Group Therapy
EXPERIMENTALThese youth will receive the non-academic cognitive behavioral programming.
Match Math Tutoring
EXPERIMENTALThese youth will receive the intensive academic mathematics tutoring.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Lowest-performing Chicago Public School high schools, based on dropout rate, scores on academic rating scale, and where fewer than 10% of students met state standards on the Prairie State Achievement Exam
- School administrators were enthusiastic about the program and agreed to terms and conditions of the experimental design
- Male youth within these schools who are rising 9th and 10th graders in AY (Academic Year) 2013-14 and 2014-15.
You may not qualify if:
- Youth who have missed \>60% of days during AY2012-13 and AY2013-14 (through March), and so would not be expected to show up in school enough during intervention years (AY2013-15) to benefit from school-based programming
- Youth who have failed \>75% of classes during AY2012-13 and AY2013-14 (through March)
- Youth who have IEP (Individualized Education Program) designations for autism, speech and language disabilities, "educable mentally handicapped", and traumatic brain injury
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Chicagolead
- MacArthur Foundationcollaborator
- U.S. Department of Justicecollaborator
- Crown Family Philanthropiescollaborator
- Edna McConnell Clark Foundationcollaborator
- Youth Guidancecollaborator
- Match Educationcollaborator
- Chicago Public Schoolscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jens Ludwig, PhD
University of Chicago
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 15, 2013
First Posted
August 22, 2013
Study Start
August 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 1, 2018
Study Completion
June 1, 2018
Last Updated
July 11, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-07