NCT01927185

Brief Summary

Central venous catheterization is commonly applied in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The subclavian vein has lower risk of infection and provides more patients comfort. However central venous catheterization may results in complications such as pneumothorax, hemothorax or arterial puncture. It has been suggested that ultrasound (US) guidance could improve the success rate, reduce the number of needle passes and decrease complications. Two different real-time 2-dimensional US techniques can be employed in the insertion of central venous catheters. The first technique involves real-time US-guided cannulation of subclavian vein using a long axis/in-plane approach. The second one involves real-time US-guided using a short axis/out-off-plane approach. However to date no studies have compared their efficacy and safety. The purpose of this study was to compare the US-guided long-axis versus short-axis approach for the SCV catheterization in adult critical care patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
190

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2013

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2013

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 20, 2013

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 22, 2013

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

January 25, 2017

Status Verified

January 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

August 20, 2013

Last Update Submit

January 24, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

central venous accessultrasonographysubclavian veinpneumothoraxvessel view

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Success rate

    up to 4 hours

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Access Time

    Hours: 0,1

  • Central line-associated blood stream infection

    days 0-21

  • Number of attempts

    hours: 0-2

  • Complication rate

    Hours: 0-6-12-24

Study Arms (2)

Long Axis strategy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The central venous catheterization will be performed by the long axis approach

Device: Long Axis strategy

Short Axis Strategy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The central venous catheterization will be performed by the short axis approach

Device: Short Axis Strategy

Interventions

With the long-axis approach the vein appeared in the longitudinal view. With this approach only the vein was visible on the screen. The needle was held at a 30° angle, oriented in-plane with the transducer and the skin punctured at the base of the transducer. The vessel alignment was maintained during the procedure and the entire length of the needle was visible during the progression through the tissues.

Long Axis strategy

With the short-axis approach the probe was positioned almost perpendicularly to the clavicle. The needle was held at an angle of 45° relative to the skin surface and sagittal to the plane of the probe (out-of-plane). During the progression to the vessel, the visualization of the needle was limited to the deformation of tissue and artefacts produced by needle advancement. When the tip abutted the vein wall, additional pressure produced transient vessel deformation, which disappeared once the wall was penetrated.

Short Axis Strategy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • aged =\>18 years
  • patients who needed central venous catheter for clinical reasons

You may not qualify if:

  • aged \<18a years

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cardiac Surgery. Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Parma

Parma, Parma, 43126, Italy

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Fragou M, Gravvanis A, Dimitriou V, Papalois A, Kouraklis G, Karabinis A, Saranteas T, Poularas J, Papanikolaou J, Davlouros P, Labropoulos N, Karakitsos D. Real-time ultrasound-guided subclavian vein cannulation versus the landmark method in critical care patients: a prospective randomized study. Crit Care Med. 2011 Jul;39(7):1607-12. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318218a1ae.

    PMID: 21494105BACKGROUND
  • Matalon TA, Silver B. US guidance of interventional procedures. Radiology. 1990 Jan;174(1):43-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.174.1.2403684.

    PMID: 2403684BACKGROUND
  • Abboud PA, Kendall JL. Ultrasound guidance for vascular access. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2004 Aug;22(3):749-73. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2004.04.003.

    PMID: 15301849BACKGROUND
  • Blaivas M, Brannam L, Fernandez E. Short-axis versus long-axis approaches for teaching ultrasound-guided vascular access on a new inanimate model. Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Dec;10(12):1307-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00002.x.

    PMID: 14644780BACKGROUND
  • Blaivas M, Adhikari S. An unseen danger: frequency of posterior vessel wall penetration by needles during attempts to place internal jugular vein central catheters using ultrasound guidance. Crit Care Med. 2009 Aug;37(8):2345-9; quiz 2359. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a067d4.

    PMID: 19531950BACKGROUND
  • Shah A, Smith A, Panchatsharam S. Ultrasound-guided subclavian venous catheterisation - is this the way forward? A narrative review. Int J Clin Pract. 2013 Aug;67(8):726-32. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12146.

    PMID: 23869675BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Postoperative ComplicationsPneumothorax

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPleural DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Study Officials

  • Antonella Vezzani, MD

    Cardiac Surgery. Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Parma

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Tiziano Gherli, MD

    Cardiac Surgery. Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Parma

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Tullio Manca, MD

    Cardiac Surgery. Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Parma

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Chief of the Cardiac Surgery Intensive Care Unit

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 20, 2013

First Posted

August 22, 2013

Study Start

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion

March 1, 2016

Study Completion

March 1, 2016

Last Updated

January 25, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-01

Locations