Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for the Prevention of Paranoia in Adolescents at High Risk
2 other identifiers
interventional
13
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main objective of this study is to decrease the severity of symptoms and improve psycho-social functioning in youth at high risk of developing psychosis by providing a specialized Group-and-Family-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (GF-CBT).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 24, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 15, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2018
CompletedDecember 4, 2018
December 1, 2018
5.9 years
July 24, 2013
December 3, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in CAARMS from Baseline
Measured by the CAARMS-Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental State (Yung et al., 2005), a clinician-administered semi-structured interview. The CAARMS includes the following subscales: disorders of thought content, perceptual abnormalities, conceptual disorganization, disorganized speech, motor changes, concentration and attention, emotion and affect, subjectively impaired energy and impaired tolerance to normal stress, as well as a measure of functioning called the Social and Occupational Functioning Scale (SOFAS).
Assessed at baseline, Post-CBT (month 5), and at follow-up assessments (months 9, 13, 17, 21, 25 and 29)
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Change in Depressive Symptoms from Baseline
Assessed at baseline, Post-CBT (month 5), and at follow-up assessments (months 9, 13, 17, 21, 25 and 29)
Change in Anxiety Symptoms from Baseline
Assessed at baseline, Post-CBT (month 5), and at follow-up assessments (months 9, 13, 17, 21, 25 and 29)
Change in PDI Score from Baseline
Assessed at baseline, Post-CBT (month 5), and at follow-up assessments (months 9, 13, 17, 21, 25 and 29)
Change in Perceived Stress from Baseline
Assessed at baseline, Post-CBT (month 5), and at follow-up assessments (months 9, 13, 17, 21, 25 and 29)
Change in Role and Social Functioning from Baseline
Assessed at baseline, Post-CBT (month 5), and at follow-up assessments (months 9, 13, 17, 21, 25 and 29)
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (5)
The Working Alliance Inventory (WAI)
Assessed at Post-CBT (month 5)
The Empathy Scale (ES)
Assessed at Post-CBT (month 5)
Group Cohesiveness Scale (GCS)
Assessed at Post-CBT (month 5)
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
EXPERIMENTALCognitive Behavioral Therapy group receives group, individual, and family Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in addition to standard care.
Monitoring
NO INTERVENTIONThis group receives standard care only.
Interventions
GF-CBT focuses on teaching emotional self-regulation, information processing, decision making strategies,and logical thinking skills. The program is comprised of three parts: 1) Group sessions in which adolescents receive social support from peers who have had similar experiences and learn CBT skills, 2) Family group sessions in which family members learn more about adolescents' experiences and learn CBT skills so that they can encourage and reinforce these skills at home, and 3) Individual sessions in which adolescents can apply CBT skills to their own lives and work toward personal goals. Group sessions are taught with Powerpoint slides and with an accompanying workbook.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- meets criteria for ARMS (at Risk Mental State, assessed by CAARMS)
- Elevated suspiciousness (PANSS,P6≥3)
You may not qualify if:
- A diagnosis of any of the following:
- Moderate to severe learning disability
- Substance dependence
- Organic impairment known to affect brain
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Weill Cornell Medical College
New York, New York, 10065, United States
Related Publications (16)
Beck AT, Steer RA, Ball R, Ranieri W. Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients. J Pers Assess. 1996 Dec;67(3):588-97. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6703_13.
PMID: 8991972BACKGROUNDBirchwood M, Smith J, Cochrane R, Wetton S, Copestake S. The Social Functioning Scale. The development and validation of a new scale of social adjustment for use in family intervention programmes with schizophrenic patients. Br J Psychiatry. 1990 Dec;157:853-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.157.6.853.
PMID: 2289094BACKGROUNDCornblatt BA, Auther AM, Niendam T, Smith CW, Zinberg J, Bearden CE, Cannon TD. Preliminary findings for two new measures of social and role functioning in the prodromal phase of schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2007 May;33(3):688-702. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbm029. Epub 2007 Apr 17.
PMID: 17440198BACKGROUNDDudley RE, John CH, Young AW, Over DE. Normal and abnormal reasoning in people with delusions. Br J Clin Psychol. 1997 May;36(2):243-58. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1997.tb01410.x.
PMID: 9167864BACKGROUNDGarety PA, Hemsley DR, Wessely S. Reasoning in deluded schizophrenic and paranoid patients. Biases in performance on a probabilistic inference task. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1991 Apr;179(4):194-201. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199104000-00003.
PMID: 2007889BACKGROUNDHan DH, Park DB, Choi TY, Joo SY, Lee MK, Park BR, Nishimura R, Chu CC, Renshaw PF. Effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor-catecholamine-O-methyltransferase gene interaction on schizophrenic symptoms. Neuroreport. 2008 Jul 16;19(11):1155-8. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32830867ad.
PMID: 18596619BACKGROUNDKay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1987;13(2):261-76. doi: 10.1093/schbul/13.2.261.
PMID: 3616518BACKGROUNDLanda Y; Chadwick P; Beck AT; Alexeenko L; Sheets M; Zhu Y; Silbersweig DA. (2011). Targeting information processing biases and social avoidance in group cognitive behavioral therapy for paranoia: A pilot randomized controlled clinical trial. Schizophr Bull; 37: 271-271.
BACKGROUNDLanda Y; Chadwick P; Stern E; Pan H; Alexeenko L; Zhu YH. . . . Silbersweig DA. Cognitive behavioral therapy for paranoia: A pilot randomized controlled clinical trial and fMRI investigation of systems-level brain circuit modulation. Biol Psychiatry 2012; 71(8): 65s-66s.
BACKGROUNDLanda Y; Silverstein S; Schwartz F; Savitz A. (2006). Group cognitive behavioral therapy for delusions: Helping patients improve reality testing. J Contemp Psychother; 36(1): 9-17. doi: 10.1007/s10879-005-9001-x
BACKGROUNDLoewy RL, Bearden CE, Johnson JK, Raine A, Cannon TD. The prodromal questionnaire (PQ): preliminary validation of a self-report screening measure for prodromal and psychotic syndromes. Schizophr Res. 2005 Sep 15;77(2-3):141-9. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2005.03.007.
PMID: 15905071BACKGROUNDPeters E, Garety P. Cognitive functioning in delusions: a longitudinal analysis. Behav Res Ther. 2006 Apr;44(4):481-514. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.03.008.
PMID: 15913544BACKGROUNDPeters E, Joseph S, Day S, Garety P. Measuring delusional ideation: the 21-item Peters et al. Delusions Inventory (PDI). Schizophr Bull. 2004;30(4):1005-22. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a007116.
PMID: 15954204BACKGROUNDPeters ER, Joseph SA, Garety PA. Measurement of delusional ideation in the normal population: introducing the PDI (Peters et al. Delusions Inventory). Schizophr Bull. 1999;25(3):553-76. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.schbul.a033401.
PMID: 10478789BACKGROUNDSpitzer RL, Williams JB, Gibbon M, First MB. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). I: History, rationale, and description. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992 Aug;49(8):624-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820080032005.
PMID: 1637252BACKGROUNDYung AR, Yuen HP, McGorry PD, Phillips LJ, Kelly D, Dell'Olio M, Francey SM, Cosgrave EM, Killackey E, Stanford C, Godfrey K, Buckby J. Mapping the onset of psychosis: the Comprehensive Assessment of At-Risk Mental States. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2005 Nov-Dec;39(11-12):964-71. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2005.01714.x.
PMID: 16343296BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yulia Landa, Psy.D., M.S.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 24, 2013
First Posted
August 15, 2013
Study Start
October 1, 2012
Primary Completion
September 1, 2018
Study Completion
September 1, 2018
Last Updated
December 4, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-12