Interbody vs Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion Following Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
Interbody Fusion and Decompression Versus Instrumented Posterolateral Fusion and Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
1 other identifier
interventional
178
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Degenerative spondylolisthesis describes the slip of one spinal segment relative to the adjacent segment. It is usually associated with spinal stenosis (which limits one's ability to walk and stand) and is the most common indication for surgery in adults over age 65 years. A variety of surgical techniques are available; the most common are the Posterolateral Instrumented Fusion (PLF), and Interbody Fusion (IF) including Posterolateral Interbody Fusion (PLIF), and Transforaminal Interbody fusion (TLIF). IF uses a cage that is placed within the cleaned out disc space between the vertebral bodies being fused. Although this approach achieves a good fusion rate and deformity correction it is associated with a higher surgical cost and potential intra-operative complication rate. What is more, no consensus exists as to whether IF provides better patient rated functional outcome and quality of life. If the advantages of IF do not translate into superior patient rated outcomes, then the risk-benefit ratio would be tipped in favor of PLF. The purpose of this study is to determine if IF is equivalent to PLF for the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis. The investigators will conduct a prospective randomized control trial comparing these two procedures. Our primary outcome measure will be the Oswestry Disability Index, which evaluates spinal pain and function.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Dec 2013
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 9, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 13, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2019
CompletedAugust 20, 2018
August 1, 2018
5 years
August 9, 2013
August 17, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Oswestry Disability Index
The Oswestry Disability Index is an effective method of measuring disability in patients with back and leg pain and is well suited to patients who have had persistent severe disability. It is a commonly utilized, validated, and highly reproducible. The questionnaire can be completed in less than 5 minutes and a large amount of normative data exists.
1 year post surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Oswestry Disability Index
Enrollment, and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 2 years, 5 years and post surgery
Other Outcomes (7)
Visual Analogue Scale for back pain intensity (0-10: 0= no pain, 10=worst pain)
Enrollment at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 5 year post surgery
Visual Analogue Scale for leg pain intensity (0-10: 0= no pain, 10=worst pain)
Enrollment and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 5 year post surgery
SF-12 (General Health outcome measure)
Enrollment at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year, 5 year post surgery
- +4 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Interbody Fusion
ACTIVE COMPARATORPosterolateral Fusion
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
The interbody fusion (IF) procedure requires exposure and removal of the disc, curetting the end plates, inserting a cage filled with bone graft, as well as stabilization with rods and screws.
In posterolateral fusion stabilization is achieved using pedicle screws joined by rods. The graft used to facilitate fusion is placed between decorticated transverse processes and can be an autograft of iliac bone or local bone, allograft, or a synthetic expander.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 50 years or older
- Grade I or II (less than 50% slip of the cephalad vertebra compared to the caudal vertebra) degenerative spondylolisthesis at one or two contiguous levels between L1 and L5.
- Lumbar spinal stenosis at the same levels of the degenerative spondylolisthesis producing radiculopathy or neurogenic claudication unresponsive to a minimum of 3 months of non surgical treatment
- Patients who are medically suitable for surgical management
- Patients who have consented for surgical treatment
- Patients able to provide informed consent for the study and complete the questionnaires
You may not qualify if:
- Lytic spondylolisthesis
- Non degenerative stenosis (example: tumor, trauma, epidural lipomatosis)
- Severe vertical foraminal stenosis necessitating interbody insertion to re-establish foraminal height
- Segmental kyphosis at the level of the spondylolisthesis
- Segmental scoliosis \>10 degrees at the level of the spondylolisthesis
- Rheumatoid arthritis
- Active infection
- On long term disability or workers compensation claim
- Drug or alcohol misuse
- Lack of permanent home residence
- Previous surgery at the proposed surgical level
- Previous fusion in the lumbar spine
- Contraindication to surgery: medical co morbidities
- Unable to complete questionnaire (e.g. Dementia)
- Unable to give voluntary consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, N6G 5L7, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christopher S Bailey, MD
The London Spine Centre
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 9, 2013
First Posted
August 13, 2013
Study Start
December 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2018
Study Completion
December 1, 2019
Last Updated
August 20, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08