Computerised Interventions for Thinking and Anxiety in Delusions (CITADEL) Trial
CITADEL
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
2
Brief Summary
People with a schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis often experience distressing worries or beliefs about others intending to cause them harm (also known as paranoia). Paranoid beliefs are associated with significant distress and disruption to the person's life. This results in high use of services and costs to mental health providers. The National Institute of Clinical Excellence recommends that cognitive behavioural therapy for psychosis (CBTp) is offered to everybody with a schizophrenia spectrum psychosis. The latest meta analyses report improved outcomes, and reduced inpatient stays following CBTp, making it a cost effective intervention. Although improved outcomes have been obtained by therapies, CBTp has only small to moderate effects on paranoid beliefs. Further, training therapists to competently deliver CBTp is intensive, expensive and takes up to a year. CBTp is therefore not widely available to service users, resulting in inequalities in access to care. The investigators are seeking to improve outcomes and accessibility of CBTp for people with distressing, paranoid beliefs. The proposed research programme aims to conduct a feasibility study of a brief therapeutic intervention, aimed at targeting and improving anxiety processes that are causally implicated in paranoia (Freeman et al, 2015). The investigators have preliminary evidence indicating that the pilot intervention, with interactive multimedia content, reduced distressing beliefs and improved coping (Freeman et al, 2015). Participants also reported they found the therapy acceptable, enjoyable and useful. Based on these results, the investigators have further modified the intervention. The feasibility and efficacy of the therapy will be investigated in a randomised controlled design (n = 34). Please note the protocol has been been amended to exclude a pilot trial of a second brief intervention targeting reasoning styles in paranoia, as since the initial protocol was developed we have obtained data from two randomised pilot studies demonstrating its feasibility and acceptability (Garety et al, 2015; Waller et al, 2015). A further pilot trial of the reasoning styles intervention is therefore not indicated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 5, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 12, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2016
CompletedMarch 20, 2017
March 1, 2017
2.8 years
August 5, 2013
March 16, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Green Paranoid Thoughts Scale
Change from baseline in paranoia scores at 8 weeks and 12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Immediate therapy
EXPERIMENTAL6 sessions of talking therapy, targeting anxiety processes associated with paranoia, will be delivered for a period of 8 weeks immediately after randomisation.
Delayed intervention
OTHERTherapy will be delayed until 12 weeks following randomisation, and then 6 sessions of talking therapy, targeting anxiety processes associated with paranoia, will be delivered over a period of 8 weeks.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Self reported worries about being harmed or at risk from others
- Non-affective psychosis(ICD10,F20-F29)
- Age 18-65
- Symptoms stable no major relapse or crisis in last 3 months prior to consent
- Sufficient command of English to provide informed consent, complete the measures and participate in the brief interventions
- Score above the cutoff for clinically significant levels of paranoia on the Green Paranoid Thoughts Scale (Green et al, 2008)
- Paranoia is triggered by being outside
You may not qualify if:
- Lack of capacity to provide informed consent
- Primary diagnosis of drug or alcohol use with secondary psychosis
- Primary diagnosis of mood disorder or bipolar affective disorder
- Primary diagnosis of learning difficulty
- Unstable residential arrangements (making a move away during the course of participation in the research likely)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
Dartford, Kent, DA2 7WG, United Kingdom
South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
London, London, SE5 8AF, United Kingdom
Related Publications (4)
Freeman D, Emsley R, Dunn G, Fowler D, Bebbington P, Kuipers E, Jolley S, Waller H, Hardy A, Garety P. The Stress of the Street for Patients With Persecutory Delusions: A Test of the Symptomatic and Psychological Effects of Going Outside Into a Busy Urban Area. Schizophr Bull. 2015 Jul;41(4):971-9. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu173. Epub 2014 Dec 20.
PMID: 25528759BACKGROUNDFreeman D, Waller H, Harpur-Lewis RA, Moore R, Garety P, Bebbington P, Kuipers E, Emsley R, Dunn G, Fowler D, Jolley S. Urbanicity, persecutory delusions, and clinical intervention: the development of a brief CBT module for helping patients with persecutory delusions enter social urban environments. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2015 Jan;43(1):42-51. doi: 10.1017/S1352465813000660. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
PMID: 23930939BACKGROUNDGarety P, Waller H, Emsley R, Jolley S, Kuipers E, Bebbington P, Dunn G, Fowler D, Hardy A, Freeman D. Cognitive mechanisms of change in delusions: an experimental investigation targeting reasoning to effect change in paranoia. Schizophr Bull. 2015 Mar;41(2):400-10. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu103. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
PMID: 25053650BACKGROUNDWaller H, Emsley R, Freeman D, Bebbington P, Dunn G, Fowler D, Hardy A, Kuipers E, Garety P. Thinking Well: A randomised controlled feasibility study of a new CBT therapy targeting reasoning biases in people with distressing persecutory delusional beliefs. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2015 Sep;48:82-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.02.007. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
PMID: 25770671BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Philippa Garety, CPsychol, MPhil, PhD, FBPsS
King's College London
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Clinical Psychologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2013
First Posted
August 12, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
October 1, 2016
Study Completion
October 1, 2016
Last Updated
March 20, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03