NCT01917981

Brief Summary

This study aims to determine the sensitivity and specificity of a Personal Heart Rhythm Monitor in the detection of prolonged paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (defined as lasting more than 12 hours) against pre-existing implantable devices, seen to be the 'gold-standard' for arrhythmia detection.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2013

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 12, 2013

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 7, 2013

Completed
25 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2013

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

April 26, 2017

Status Verified

April 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

July 12, 2013

Last Update Submit

April 24, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Intermittent cardiac monitoringImplantable device

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The sensitivity and specificity of detection of prolonged paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) using a Personal Heart Rhythm Monitor (PHRM), compared to an implantable device.

    Measured (%) as the number of identified episodes of prolonged PAF using the PHRM compared to the gold standard implantable device in all patients over the 3 month period.

    18 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • The sensitivity and specificity of detection of all episodes of PAF using a PHRM, compared to an implantable device.

    18 months

  • Participant compliance with twice-daily recordings with the PHRM for a three month period.

    18 months

  • The concordance of the interpretation of PHRM recordings by a Research Nurse and blinded Cardiologist.

    18 months

Study Arms (1)

Personal Heart Rhythm Monitor

EXPERIMENTAL

Intermittent cardiac monitoring with a Personal Heart Rhythm Monitor for three months.

Device: Personal Heart Rhythm Monitor

Interventions

Also known as: Portable ECG monitor HCG-801 - OMRON Healthcare
Personal Heart Rhythm Monitor

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Prolonged AF (defined as an episode at least 12 hours duration) in the last month whilst attending routine pacemaker check
  • Pacing requirement \< 25% during the last month

You may not qualify if:

  • Lack of capacity
  • Inability to use the Personal Heart Rhythm Monitor due to cognitive or physical impairment
  • Commencement of new anti-arrhythmic drug since last pacemaker check

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

St Peter's Hospital

Chertsey, Surrey, KT16 0PJ, United Kingdom

Location

Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XX, United Kingdom

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrial FibrillationStroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsCerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Philippa J Howlett, MBChB MRCP

    The University of Surrey and The Royal Surrey County Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
NA
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2013

First Posted

August 7, 2013

Study Start

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion

October 1, 2015

Study Completion

October 1, 2015

Last Updated

April 26, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-04

Locations