Comparison Study of Lay Person Finger Stick Versus Blood Draw
Usability and HbA1c Method Comparison Study Using Lay Person Micro-Blood Specimens
1 other identifier
interventional
128
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This is a study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Micro-Serum/Micro-Blood (finger Stick) Specimen Collection as compared to samples obtained by standard venipuncture (blood taken from the arm vein).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1 diabetes
Started May 2012
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 21, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 31, 2013
CompletedApril 21, 2014
April 1, 2014
5 months
March 21, 2013
April 18, 2014
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Usability and HbA1c Method Comparison Study Using Lay-Person Micro-Blood Specimens
To establish that when using capillary blood collected in the Home Access Collection Cassette, lay-users can obtain HbA1c results equivalent to results from professionally-collected samples
Outpoint measured within 3 months
Study Arms (1)
A1c, Self-collection, Blood sample
EXPERIMENTALCan a lay-persons safely and effectively self-collect a capillary blood sample of sufficient adequacy for A1c ("HbA1c") testing in a clinical laboratory
Interventions
This is a study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Micro-Serum/Micro-Blood (finger Stick) Specimen Collection as compared to samples obtained by standard venipuncture (blood taken from the arm vein).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Ability to understand and follow verbal and written instructions in English
- Demonstrate a willingness to participate by providing a written informed consent
- Aged between 18 to 80 years of age with no obvious signs of illness (e.g. fever, vomiting)
- Diabetics who were diagnosed 6 months ago or longer are preferred. However, non-diabetics will be accepted into the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Withdrawn informed consent
- Mental or physical impairment which would preclude participation
- Any condition which, in the opinion of the Principle Investigator or site or study coordinator, makes the participant unsuitable for this study. This includes but is not limited to any mental or physical impairment, which would preclude provision of adequate and knowledgeable consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Mills-Peninsula Health Services
San Mateo, California, 94401, United States
L-MARC
Louisville, Kentucky, 40213, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Klonoff, MD
Mills-Peninsula Health Services Dorothy L. and James E. Frank Diabetes Research Institute 100 South San Mateo Drive San Mateo, California 94401
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Harold E. Bayes, MD
L-MARC, 3288 Illinois Ave., Louisville, KY
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 21, 2013
First Posted
July 31, 2013
Study Start
May 1, 2012
Primary Completion
October 1, 2012
Study Completion
October 1, 2012
Last Updated
April 21, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-04