Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
SBRT for HCC
Effectiveness and Safety of the Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Prospective Phase II Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
1
Brief Summary
1\. Background 1.1. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) HCC is the third most common cause of cancer death globally. It is also the second cause of cancer mortality in Korea, despite the incidence of HCC was fifth. The most important cause of this discrepancy is connected with the fact that the significant portion of the HCC is detected as unresectable status. 1.2. Standard treatment of the HCC At the point of HCC diagnosis, only 30% of the patients could receive standard curative treatment, like resection, liver transplantation, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been shown in randomized trials to improve survival compared with symptomatic therapy alone, in the patients without macrovascular involvement, extrahepatic disease and tumor related symptoms. However, in the recent review of TACE, TACE might be contraindicate or not recommended in the patients who showed vascular tumor invasion, more than 10 cm size, poor portal blood flow and/or repeated poor response. Recently, Sorafenib, which is one of the target agents, showed survival advantage on unresectable HCC patients in two randomized study. In those study, sorafenib improved approximately three month overall survival increment, however, the median survival duration was only 10.7 months in experiment group (received sorafenib), and even 6.5 months in Asian-Pacific trial. Additionally, the possibility that sorafenib effect could be reduced in the patients had hepatitis B virus (HBV) was suggested in the subgroup analysis. 1.3 Radiation therapy (RT) for the HCC The use of RT in HCC is increased with the radiation technological advances. In the unresectable patients, RT showed 50 to 60% response rate with the dose response relationship. Recently, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) showed excellent local control and comparable survival rate in thoracic tumor. In the HCC, SBRT also showed 75 to 100% local control rate without significant elevation of the toxicities. One study reported that 24 to 54 Gy SBRT achieved 87% 1year local control and 17 months overall survival. The standard treatment of unresectable HCC is sorafenib, but Korean Liver Cancer Study Group (KLCSG) recommend RT as an option in localized unresectable HCC. Furthermore, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) started randomized trial to confirm the effect of SBRT in unresectable HCC (RTOG 1112). Investigators previously reported the retrospective result that the higher dose SBRT achieved 2 year overall survival 87.9% and local control 85% in the patient who showed less than 5 cm solitary HCC without portal vein involvement. Based on those studies, we start this prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness and adverse event of SBRT in the patients who had solitary 3 cm or less size HCC without extrahepatic lesion and vascular involvement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 17, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 30, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2019
CompletedNovember 22, 2023
November 1, 2023
5.7 years
July 17, 2013
November 20, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
To evaluate the SBRT effect on local progression free survival rate
Radiologic response will be evaluated at 1, 3 month after SBRT, and then every 3 month imaging follow up will be continued. Local progression will be defined by modified Modified response evaluation criteria for solid tumor (mRECIST). Local progression was defined as 20% or more size increase of contrast enhanced primary lesion or new contrast enhanced lesion in planning target volume.
Radiologic response will be evaluated at 3 month.
To evaluate the SBRT effect on adverse events
Adverse events will be evaluated at 1 and 3 month after SBRT, and then every 3 month follow up will be continued.. Adverse event will be evaluated with common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE version 4.0) during follow up.
Adverse events will be evaluated at 3 month after SBRT.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
To determine the SBRT objective response rate
Response will be evaluated at 3 month
To measure the time to local tumor progression
Response will be evaluated at 3 month after SBRT.
To measure the overall survival
Survival will be evaluated at 3 month after SBRT.
To measure the progression free survival
Response will be evaluated at 3 month after SBRT.
Other Outcomes (2)
Quality of life(QOL)change before and after RT
QoL will be assessed before, and 1, 3, 6 months after SBRT.
RT response prediction probability evaluation by diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI and positron emission tomography
At 1 month after RT
Study Arms (1)
Stereotactic body radiotherapy
EXPERIMENTALStereotactic body radiotherapy 60 Gy/3 fraction standard dose The highest allowable dose with maintain normal tissue constraints
Interventions
Respiration training will be done on the day that patient decided participate this study with wearing video goggle and headphone assisted respiration by visual and voice. Four dimensional CT simulation with wearing video goggle and headphone assisted respiration by visual and voice and real time position management system (PRM) signal will be adopted. Planning MRI with diffusion image also be acquired in same condition with CT simulation. SBRT will be delivered daily 20 Gy for 3 fractions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients must have a diagnosis of HCC by at least one criterion listed below (KLCSG guideline 2009) 1.1 Pathologically (histologically or cytologically) proven diagnosis of HCC 1.2 Liver nodule in high risk group 1.2.1 If alpha feto protein (AFP)≥200 ng/mL , ≥ 1 typical HCC enhancing pattern on dynamic contrast enhanced CT or MRI 1.2.2 If AFP\<200 ng/mL, ≥2 typical HCC enhancing pattern on dynamic contrast enhanced CT, MRI, and angiography 1.3 ≥ 2 cm nodule in liver cirrhosis (LC), ≥ 1 typical HCC enhancing pattern on dynamic contrast enhanced CT or MRI
- Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status 0 or 1
- Size of the HCC ≤ 3 cm or less
- Age ≥ 20
- Unsuitable for resection or transplant or RFA
- Unsuitable for or refractory to TACE or drug eluting beads (DEB)
- Agreement of study-specific informed consent
- Assessment by radiation oncologist and medical oncologist or hepatologist within 28 days prior to study entry?
- Child-Pugh score A within 14 days prior to study entry
- normal liver (Liver minus gross tumor volume) ≥ 700 cc
- Target is only one viable hepatocellular carcinoma
- Blood work requirements
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1,500 /mm3, Platelet ≥ 70,000/mm3, Hgb ≥ 8 g/dl
- Liver function test (LFT): T. bilirubin\<3.0 mg/dL, International normalized ratio (INR) \< 1.7, Albumin ≥ 2.8g/dL, Aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/Alanine aminotransferase (ALT)\< 6 X normal
- Serum creatinine \< 1.5 X normal, or Creatinine clearance rate ≥ 60 mL/min
- +4 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Extrahepatic metastasis or malignant nodes
- Pregnant and/or breastfeeding woman
- Macroscopic vascular tumor involvement
- Previous upper abdominal RT history
- Uncontrolled active co-morbidity
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 135-710, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hee Chul Park, M.D., Ph.D.
Samsung Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 17, 2013
First Posted
July 30, 2013
Study Start
August 1, 2013
Primary Completion
April 1, 2019
Study Completion
April 1, 2019
Last Updated
November 22, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11