Enhancing the Effectiveness of Electroconvulsive Therapy in Severe Depression
EFFECT-Dep
A Randomised Controlled Trial of Standard Bilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy Versus High-dose Unilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy for Severe Depression
2 other identifiers
interventional
138
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the most powerful antidepressant treatment available and is often life-saving. There are concerns, however, that standard bitemporal ECT (the most commonly used form of ECT worldwide) causes persisting retrograde amnesia. However, clinical trials have indicated that high-dose unilateral ECT may be as effective as bitemporal ECT but have much less cognitive side-effects. The trial aims to test the primary experimental hypothesis: High-dose (6 x ST) right unilateral ECT is as effective as (i.e. not inferior to) standard (1.5 x ST) bitemporal ECT for severe depression in terms of Hamilton Depression Rating Score (HDRS) at the end of the treatment course.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 depression
Started May 2008
Longer than P75 for phase_4 depression
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 16, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 24, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 14, 2018
CompletedNovember 14, 2018
April 1, 2018
5.5 years
June 16, 2013
December 21, 2016
April 22, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)
The HDRS was originally designed to assess severity of depressive symptoms in patients with a primary depressive illness and is now the most commonly used measure of depression severity. It was first published in a 17-item format with the optional addition of 4 items making up the 21-item version. In addition to the original 21 items, the 24-item HDRS includes items on helplessness, hopelessness and worthlessness; its score range is 0-77, with higher scores reflecting greater burden of depressive symptoms.
HDRS scores were obtained at baseline, end of allocated ECT treatment, and at 3 and 6 month follow-up timepoints.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Columbia Autobiographical Memory Interview-Short Form (AMI-SF)
end of allocated ECT course
Columbia Autobiographical Memory Interview-Short Form (AMI-SF)
3 months follow-up
Columbia Autobiographical Memory Interview-Short Form (AMI-SF)
6 months follow-up
Study Arms (2)
Bilateral ECT Mecta 5000M
ACTIVE COMPARATORModified bilateral ECT (bitemporal electrode positions) twice weekly at 1.5 times the seizure threshold. Methohexitone (0.75-1.0 mg/kg) is used for anaesthesia with suxamethonium (0.5-1.0mg/kg) for muscle relaxation.
High-dose unilateral ECT Mecta 5000M
EXPERIMENTALHigh-dose right modified unilateral ECT twice weekly at 6 times the seizure threshold. Methohexitone (0.75-1.0 mg/kg) is used for anaesthesia with suxamethonium (0.5-1.0mg/kg) for muscle relaxation.
Interventions
ECT is administered twice weekly with hand-held electrodes using the Mecta 5000M device following a standard stimulus dosing protocol. Seizure duration is measured by EEG monitoring. Methohexitone (0.75-1.0 mg/kg) is used for anaesthesia with suxamethonium (0.5-1.0 mg/kg) as muscle relaxant. Seizure threshold (ST) is established by a method of limits at the first session and subsequent treatments will be given at 1.5 x ST for BT ECT and 6.0 x ST for RUL ECT. To reflect routine clinical practice, number of ECT treatments is determined by referring physicians who will be blind to randomisation. The treatment period varies between patients to allow up to 12 administrations of ECT, i.e. up to 6 weeks.
Methohexitone (0.75-1.0 mg/kg) is used for anaesthesia along with suxamethonium (0.5-1.0 mg/kg)for muscle relaxation. Anesthesia is the same for both arms of the trial.
Suxamethonium (0.5-1.0 mg/kg)is used for muscle relaxation along with Methohexitone (0.75-1.0 mg/kg) for anaesthesia. Anesthesia is the same for both arms of the trial.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients ≥18 years diagnosed with major depressive episode (DSM-IV) and referred for ECT
You may not qualify if:
- Any condition rendering patients medically unfit for general anaesthesia or ECT; treatment with ECT in previous six months; dementia or other Axis 1 diagnosis; alcohol/other substance abuse in previous six months; inability/refusal to consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- St Patrick's Hospital, Irelandlead
- Health Research Board, Irelandcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
St Patrick's University Hospital
Dublin, 8, Ireland
Related Publications (1)
Fenton C, McLoughlin DM. Usefulness of Hamilton rating scale for depression subset scales and full versions for electroconvulsive therapy. PLoS One. 2021 Nov 9;16(11):e0259861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259861. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34752484DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
We did not include involuntary patients who could not consent due to illness severity (7.4% of referrals), for whom bitemporal ECT may be better. The AMI-SF does not allow quantification of retrograde amnesia attributable directly to ECT.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Prof Declan McLoughlin
- Organization
- St Patrick's University Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Declan M McLoughlin, PhD
St Patrick's University Hospital
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 16, 2013
First Posted
July 24, 2013
Study Start
May 1, 2008
Primary Completion
November 1, 2013
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
November 14, 2018
Results First Posted
November 14, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04