Verifying Post-delivery Anal Sphincter Integrity Using Perineal Ultrasound: Impact on Immediate Care
OASIS 2
Verifying Anal Sphincter Integrity in the Delivery Room Using a Specific Perineal Ultrasound: Impact on Immediate Care and Postpartum Anal Incontinence Rates in Mothers Undergoing Vaginal Birth
2 other identifiers
interventional
276
1 country
3
Brief Summary
The main objective of this study is to compare post partum rates of anal sphincter rupture (that is to say the rate of sutures) diagnosed in women with ≥ 2nd degree vaginal tears between two groups: (1) women who are screened just after delivery by performing a perineal ultrasound versus a similar group of women who did not receive screening. This study was not designed to evaluate ultrasound as a diagnostic test but to compare the rate of perineal surgical procedures in each arm.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 19, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 23, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 7, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 24, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 15, 2017
CompletedJune 19, 2017
June 1, 2017
2.7 years
July 19, 2013
June 16, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Presence/absence of an anal sphincter rupture
Day 0
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Wexner score for anal incontinence
Day 0
Wexner score for anal incontinence
3 months
Tolerance of perineal ultrasound
Day 0
Kappa coefficient for inter-operator ultrasound reading
Day 0
Kappa coefficient for intra-operator ultrasound reading
Day 0
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
With ultrasound
EXPERIMENTALPatients in this group will have perineal ultrasound for the detection of anal sphincter ruptures. Intervention: Perineal ultrasound
Without ultrasound
NO INTERVENTIONPatients in this group will not have perineal ultrasound for the detection of anal sphincter ruptures.
Interventions
Perineal ultrasound will be used after delivery to help detect anal sphincter ruptures.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The patient must have given her informed and signed consent
- The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
- The patient is available for 3 months of follow-up
- Paturient, vaginal births only
- Presence of \>= stage 2 perineal lesion
- Patient accepts a priori the performance of a perineal ultrasound
You may not qualify if:
- The patient is participating in another study (excepting BBBOX (2011-A00327-36), ElastoMAP (2013-A01148-37), ElastoDéclench, BAKRI, Papillo PMA, GrossPath, LXRs, DGPostPartum, "scalp lactates", and UpSideDown studies)
- The patient is under judicial protection, under tutorship or curatorship
- The patient refuses to sign the consent
- It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
- Delivery by C-section
- Intact perineum after delivery (no indication for perineal surgery in light of absence of vaginal lesion)
- Emergency situation preventing time for perineal ultrasound
- History of anal incontinence before giving birth
- Allergy to ultrasound gel
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
CHU de Montpellier - Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve
Montpellier, 34295, France
CHU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
Nîmes, 30029, France
CHU de Poitiers
Poitiers, 86021, France
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Vincent Letouzey, MD
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 19, 2013
First Posted
July 23, 2013
Study Start
March 7, 2014
Primary Completion
November 24, 2016
Study Completion
April 15, 2017
Last Updated
June 19, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-06