Study Stopped
Withdrawn for business reasons
TruFreeze™ Airway Obstruction: TAO STUDY
TAO
A PROSPECTIVE, MULTI-CENTER PILOT STUDY OF THE truFREEZE™ SYSTEM TO ASSESS THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF CRYO SPRAY ABLATION IN THE TREATMENT OF AIRWAY OBSTRUCTIONS (TruFreeze AIRWAY OBSTRUCTION - "TAO" STUDY)
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to prospectively assess the efficacy and safety of spray cryotherapy ablation with the truFreeze System in conjunction with mechanical dilation or debridement for the treatment of clinically significant obstructions of the central airways. The primary effectiveness endpoint is the proportion of subjects with a minimum of 25% improvement in luminal patency following SCT treatment and mechanical intervention 30 days (+/- 5 days) following treatment. Additionally, a primary clinical safety endpoint is the reporting of all adverse events.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Jul 2013
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 16, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 19, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2014
CompletedFebruary 2, 2016
February 1, 2016
10 months
July 16, 2013
February 1, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary clinical effectiveness endpoint is a minimum of 25% improvement in luminal patency following SCT treatment and mechanical intervention, on the Day 30 assessment following the last SCT treatment.
The primary efficacy endpoint for statistical analysis and study powering is the proportion of subjects exhibiting an adequate (minimum of 25%) improvement in airway patency on the Day 30 assessment following the last SCT treatment.
30 - 44 Days (+/- 5 days)
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Subject symptoms and functional status
30-44 days (+/- 5 days)
Study Arms (1)
spray cryotherapy
EXPERIMENTALspray cryotherapy: 4 -5 second sprays at Baseline (possible additional tx. to be determined at follow up)
Interventions
spray cryotherapy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects with symptomatic, clinically significant central airway obstruction requiring treatment intervention and who are not candidates for surgical resection. The central airway obstruction must be a consequence of any of the following:
- Benign airway strictures
- Primary or secondary endobronchial tumors located in the central airways
- Airway stents complicated by significant granulation tissue
- Subjects (or designated proxies) who are able to provide written informed consent
- Subjects aged 18 years or greater
- Subjects with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 3 or less
- Subjects deemed eligible candidates for spray cryotherapy based on medical history and physical exam
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects undergoing treatment with any other investigational therapy within the month preceding cryotherapy or planned within 1 month following treatment
- a. Subjects with malignant strictures who require chemotherapy/radiation therapy (including investigational therapies) within 30 days will be allowed participation in the study.
- Subjects with extraluminal causes of airway obstruction such as bulky mediastinal adenopathy, or a central mediastinal tumor causing compression of the airway
- Subjects with less than 3 month expected survival
- Subjects who it is anticipated will require stent placement during their initial treatment
- Subjects who are pregnant or nursing, per device instructions for use
- Subjects (or a designated proxy) who are unwilling to provide written informed consent
- Subjects with ECOG performance status greater than 3
- Subjects likely to have difficulty complying with study visit follow-up scheduling
- Known history of unresolved drug or alcohol dependency that would limit ability to comprehend or follow instructions related to informed consent, post-treatment instructions, or follow-up
- Subjects with uncontrolled coagulopathy or other bleeding disorders
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (12)
Ernst A, Feller-Kopman D, Becker HD, Mehta AC. Central airway obstruction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004 Jun 15;169(12):1278-97. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200210-1181SO.
PMID: 15187010BACKGROUNDJohnston CM, Schoenfeld LP, Mysore JV, Dubois A. Endoscopic spray cryotherapy: a new technique for mucosal ablation in the esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999 Jul;50(1):86-92. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(99)70352-4.
PMID: 10385730BACKGROUNDGreenwald BD, Dumot JA, Horwhat JD, Lightdale CJ, Abrams JA. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of endoscopic low-pressure liquid nitrogen spray cryotherapy in the esophagus. Dis Esophagus. 2010 Jan;23(1):13-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2009.00991.x. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
PMID: 19515183BACKGROUNDShaheen NJ, Greenwald BD, Peery AF, Dumot JA, Nishioka NS, Wolfsen HC, Burdick JS, Abrams JA, Wang KK, Mallat D, Johnston MH, Zfass AM, Smith JO, Barthel JS, Lightdale CJ. Safety and efficacy of endoscopic spray cryotherapy for Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Apr;71(4):680-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.018.
PMID: 20363409BACKGROUNDGreenwald BD, Dumot JA, Abrams JA, Lightdale CJ, David DS, Nishioka NS, Yachimski P, Johnston MH, Shaheen NJ, Zfass AM, Smith JO, Gill KR, Burdick JS, Mallat D, Wolfsen HC. Endoscopic spray cryotherapy for esophageal cancer: safety and efficacy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Apr;71(4):686-93. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.042.
PMID: 20363410BACKGROUNDXue HB, Tan HH, Liu WZ, Chen XY, Feng N, Gao YJ, Song Y, Zhao YJ, Ge ZZ. A pilot study of endoscopic spray cryotherapy by pressurized carbon dioxide gas for Barrett's esophagus. Endoscopy. 2011 May;43(5):379-85. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256334. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
PMID: 21437849BACKGROUNDHalsey KD, Chang JW, Waldt A, Greenwald BD. Recurrent disease following endoscopic ablation of Barrett's high-grade dysplasia with spray cryotherapy. Endoscopy. 2011 Oct;43(10):844-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256649. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
PMID: 21826629BACKGROUNDFernando HC, Dekeratry D, Downie G, Finley D, Sullivan V, Sarkar S, Rivas R Jr, Santos RS. Feasibility of spray cryotherapy and balloon dilation for non-malignant strictures of the airway. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Nov;40(5):1177-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.02.062. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
PMID: 21482131BACKGROUNDKrimsky WS, Rodrigues MP, Malayaman N, Sarkar S. Spray cryotherapy for the treatment of glottic and subglottic stenosis. Laryngoscope. 2010 Mar;120(3):473-7. doi: 10.1002/lary.20794.
PMID: 20058314BACKGROUNDKrimsky WS, Broussard JN, Sarkar SA, Harley DP. Bronchoscopic spray cryotherapy: assessment of safety and depth of airway injury. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Mar;139(3):781-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.03.051. Epub 2009 Aug 6. No abstract available.
PMID: 19664781BACKGROUNDFinley DJ, Dycoco J, Sarkar S, Krimsky WS, Sherwood JT, Dekeratry D, Downie G, Atwood J, Fernando HC, Rusch VW. Airway spray cryotherapy: initial outcomes from a multiinstitutional registry. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Jul;94(1):199-203; discussion 203-4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.112. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
PMID: 22516831BACKGROUNDAu JT, Carson J, Monette S, Finley DJ. Spray cryotherapy is effective for bronchoscopic, endoscopic and open ablation of thoracic tissues. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012 Oct;15(4):580-4. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivs192. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
PMID: 22811511BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hiran C Fernando, MD
Boston Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 16, 2013
First Posted
July 19, 2013
Study Start
July 1, 2013
Primary Completion
May 1, 2014
Study Completion
September 1, 2014
Last Updated
February 2, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share