Efficacy of Intravenous Ibuprofen Compared to Intravenous Ketorolac for Pain Control Following Arthroscopic Knee Surgery
A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Determine the Efficacy of Intravenous Ibuprofen Compared to Intravenous Ketorolac for Pain Control Following Arthroscopic Knee Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of intravenous ibuprofen compared to ketorolac for the treatment of postoperative pain as measured by patient pain intensity (Visual Analog Scale, VAS)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4 pain
Started Jul 2013
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 12, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 17, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 15, 2016
CompletedMarch 14, 2016
February 1, 2016
1.1 years
July 12, 2013
January 18, 2016
February 12, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Efficacy of Pain Relief (Pain Intensity at Rest)
Pain assessed using VAS (Visual Analog Scale, VAS). The VAS is a continuous scale compromised of a horizontal line, one hundred millimeters in length, anchored by 2 verbal descriptors (No Pain, Worst Possible Pain). The VAS is self-completed by the respondent. The respondent is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity. Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance, in mm, on the 100 mm line between the "No Pain" anchor and the subject's mark. The score would be between 0 (No Pain) and 100 (Worst Possible Pain).
First possible time post-surgery, an expected average of 6 hours
Efficacy of Pain Relief (Pain Intensity With Movement)
Pain assessed using VAS (Visual Analog Scale, VAS). The VAS is a continuous scale compromised of a horizontal line, one hundred millimeters in length, anchored by 2 verbal descriptors (No Pain, Worst Possible Pain). The VAS is self-completed by the respondent. The respondent is asked to place a line perpendicular to the VAS line at the point that represents their pain intensity. Using a ruler, the score is determined by measuring the distance, in mm, on the 100 mm line between the "No Pain" anchor and the subject's mark. The score would be between 0 (No Pain) and 100 (Worst Possible Pain).
First possible time post-surgery, an expected average of 6 hours
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Rescue Medication Use in Post-operative Period
Post-operative period until discharge, an expected average of 6 hours
Time to First Use of Rescue Med Will be Measured
Post-operative period until discharge, an expected average of 6 hours
Patient Satisfaction
Post-operative period until discharge, an expected average of 6 hours
Incidence of Serious Adverse Events
Post-operative period until discharge, an expected average of 6 hours
Study Arms (2)
IV ibuprofen
EXPERIMENTAL800mg ibuprofen
ketorolac
ACTIVE COMPARATOR30mg ketorolac
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients scheduled for knee arthroscopy
You may not qualify if:
- Inadequate IV access.
- History of allergy or hypersensitivity to any component of ibuprofen, ketorolac, aspirin (or aspirin related products), non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids or cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors.
- Less than 18 years of age.
- Use of analgesics less than 8 hours prior to surgery.
- Patients with active, clinically significant anemia.
- History or evidence of asthma or heart failure.
- Pregnant.
- Recent history of chronic opioid use.
- Concomitant use of probenecid.
- Inability to understand the requirements of the study, be willing to provide written informed consent (as evidenced by signature on an informed consent document approved by an Institutional Review Board \[IRB\]), and agree to abide by the study restrictions and to return for the required assessments.
- Refusal to provide written authorization for use and disclosure of protected health information.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Shrock Orthopedic Research
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33316, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
North Mississippi Sports Medicine & Orthopaedic Clinic
Tupelo, Mississippi, 38801, United States
The Ohio State University Vexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Amy Rock, PhD
- Organization
- Cumberland Pharmaceutical Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Arthur P Wheeler, MD
Cumberland Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 12, 2013
First Posted
July 17, 2013
Study Start
July 1, 2013
Primary Completion
August 1, 2014
Study Completion
August 1, 2014
Last Updated
March 14, 2016
Results First Posted
February 15, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-02