Sustainable HIV Risk Reduction Strategies for CJ Systems
DRR
Sustainable Disease Risk Reduction Strategies for CJ Systems
1 other identifier
interventional
1,396
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of the Texas Christian University (TCU) Disease Risk Reduction (DRR) Project is to develop and test an intervention designed to increase positive decision-making skills among offenders for healthy living, including skills for making decisions for reducing disease risk behaviors, particularly those involving HIV and Hepatitis B \& C. This project focuses on the critical transition time between incarceration and return to the community.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 2, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 16, 2013
CompletedJuly 16, 2013
July 1, 2013
3 years
July 2, 2013
July 11, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
HIV Knowledge Confidence (change from pre-test to post-test)
13 item scale comprised of items assessing knowledge, confidence and motivation regarding HIV knowledge (alpha = .89. Responses on a 5-point "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree" scale. Sample item -- "You should know enough to teach others what they should do if they have been exposed to HIV."
One week prior to the intervention start (for both experiemental and control arms) and one week after the intervention
Avoiding Risky Sex (change from pre-test to post-test)
13 item scale comprised of items assessing knowledge, confidence and motivation regarding avoiding risky sex behaviors (alpha = .91. Responses on a 5-point "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree" scale. Sample item -- "You have learned to think ahead in order to make less risky decisions about sex."
One week prior to the intervention start (for both experiemental and control arms) and one week after the intervention
Avoiding Risky Drug Use (change from pre-test to post-test)
12 item scale comprised of items assessing knowledge, confidence and motivation regarding avoiding risky drug use behaviors (alpha = .85. Responses on a 5-point "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree" scale. Sample item -- "If you decide to inject drugs, you will always use a 'clean needle'."
One week prior to the intervention start (for both experiemental and control arms) and one week after the intervention
HIV Testing Awareness (change from pre-test to post-test)
7 item scale comprised of items assessing knowledge and motivation regarding getting tested for HIV (alpha = .76). Responses on a 5-point "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree" scale. Sample item -- "You plan on being tested regularly for HIV."
One week prior to the intervention start (for both experiemental and control arms) and one week after the intervention
Risk Reduction Skills (change from pre-test to post-test)
14 item scale comprised of items assessing knowledge, confidence and motivation regarding identifying, planning for, and avoiding risk situations (alpha = .85). Responses on a 5-point "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree" scale. Sample item -- "You know how to stand up for yourself when pressured to take a risk."
One week prior to the intervention start (for both experiemental and control arms) and one week after the intervention
Study Arms (2)
WaySafe
EXPERIMENTALWaySafe -- Participants in this arm received a curriculum titled WaySafe that focused on identifying, planning for, and avoiding HIV risk behaviors after release from prison. WaySafe included 6 hour-long, group-based, highly interactive sessions normally held weekly with homework assignments given between sessions.
Treatment as usual
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants in this arm completed pre- and post-surveys and attended normal substance abuse programming.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Incarcerated offenders in eight participating facilities in two states entering the last phase of their prison-based substance abuse treatment.
You may not qualify if:
- Sex offenders or those convicted of a violent crime.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Wayne Lehmanlead
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Wayne E Lehman, Ph.D.
Institute of Behavioral Research, Texas Christian University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Research Scientist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 2, 2013
First Posted
July 16, 2013
Study Start
August 1, 2008
Primary Completion
August 1, 2011
Study Completion
November 1, 2011
Last Updated
July 16, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-07