Efficacy and Saftey Study of 99mTc-ECDG in the Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
A Prospective, Open-label, Multicenter Study With Blinded Over-reading Characterizing the Efficacy and Safety of 99mTc-EC-DG in the Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will compare how well a new radiolabeled imaging agent ECDG compares to the current testing for coronary artery disease (radiolabeled Sestamibi) during a rest and stress cardiac test as documented from results of a coronary angiogram (if performed).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2 coronary-artery-disease
Started May 2025
Shorter than P25 for phase_2 coronary-artery-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 10, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 16, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 10, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2026
CompletedApril 1, 2025
March 1, 2025
7 months
July 10, 2013
March 31, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Efficacy: Characterization of the efficacy of 99mTCc-ECDG in the evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease
1\. Determine efficacy (sensitivity and specificity) of 99mTc-ED-DG: i. Compare efficacy of a rest and stress study at approximately 15 minutes post injection compared with efficacy of a standard 99mTc-SPECT rest/stress perfusion study for detecting the presence of CAD using invasive coronary angiography as the truth standard.\* ii. Compare efficacy of a rest and stress study at approximately 60 minutes post injection compared with a standard 99mTc-SPECT rest/stress perfusion study for detecting the presence of CAD using invasive coronary angiography as the truth standard.\* \* Images will be displayed using the standard Cedars Sinai tomographic display software which projects images in the short axis, vertical long, and horizontal long axis displays.
Visit 1a through Visit 3 approximately 3 to 20 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Safety: The number of participants with Adverse Events
From screeniing through up to 14 days after last study related procedure
Study Arms (1)
99mTc-EC-DG, Diagnostic
EXPERIMENTAL99mTc-EC-DG (25 ± 5 mCi, up to 250 µg EC-DG) will be administered by intravenous (IV) bolus injection. Other Name:Technetium-99m-labeled Ethylenedicysteine-Deoxyglucose
Interventions
An injection of 99mTC-Sestamibi will be administered by IV push under medically observed conditions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age \> 18 years
- Either of the following:
- Standard 99mTc-SPECT perfusion rest/stress study completed within 30 days prior to screening and a coronary angiography study is clinically planned after the 99mTc-C-DG rest and stress visits in this study
- Coronary angiography study planned or completed within 30 days of screening and no coronary intervention has been performed and willingness to complete a standard 99mTc-SPECT rest/stress study
- The patient is able to provide informed consent to participate in this study
- No change in medical therapy between study procedures.
You may not qualify if:
- Known cardiomyopathy or history of congestive heart failure (CHF) due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction \< 40%)
- Starting a new anti-anginal drug or performance of revascularization prior to completing the 99mTc-EC-DG rest and stress study visits
- Contraindication for provocative stress testing based on American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines for exercise or pharmacologic testing
- Intolerance or inability to receive sestamibi, tetrofosmin, or regadenoson, or an inability or unwillingness to exercise on a graded treadmill or receive pharmacologic stress
- Inability to lie still for approximately 30 minutes during image acquisition
- Women of childbearing potential, unless willing to use adequate contraception throughout the duration of the trial. Adequate contraception is considered hormonal contraception for \> 3 months prior to entry, intrauterine device (IUD) in place for at least 3 months, double barrier methods (condoms, diaphragm or spermicide), abstinence, or a partner with non-reversed vasectomy \> 40 days prior to entry.
- Pregnant or nursing
- History of malignant disease (excluding treated basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of skin, or low grade cancers that are stable and not interfering with exercise may be allowed with permission from the Medical Monitor) within 5 years prior to screening. Resolution of a prior malignancy more than 5 years prior to screening must be deemed as cured by the investigator
- Any physical, psychological or substance abuse (drug or alcohol) condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the ability to provide informed consent or comply with study instructions or may adversely affect the safety of the patient if enrolled in this trial
- A known allergy to 99mTc-EC-DG or its components
- Inability to adhere to requirements specific to the study site's protocols for imaging and exercise/pharmacological stress testing, including but not limited to dietary restrictions and prohibited medications
- Received an investigational drug within 30 days prior to this study
- Prior bypass surgery
- Enrolled or plans to enroll in another clinical trial during this study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cell>Point LLClead
Study Sites (1)
Tom Hennebry, MD
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73210, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gary Heller, MD
Consultant
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 10, 2013
First Posted
July 16, 2013
Study Start
May 10, 2025
Primary Completion
December 1, 2025
Study Completion
April 1, 2026
Last Updated
April 1, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share