NCT01899599

Brief Summary

Efficacy of PankoMab-GEX vs Placebo in maintaining a response to chemotherapy in advanced ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer.

Trial Health

93
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
216

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2013

Typical duration for phase_2

Geographic Reach
8 countries

50 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 4, 2013

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 15, 2013

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2013

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 20, 2017

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 28, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

October 22, 2020

Status Verified

October 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3.6 years

First QC Date

July 4, 2013

Last Update Submit

October 20, 2020

Conditions

Keywords

Ovarian CancerMaintenance Therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Progression free survival

    PFS will be determined by radiographic progression based on modified RECIST 1.1 or death of any cause.

    from baseline till progression of disease or death

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • To assess the safety and tolerability of maintenance therapy with single-agent PankoMab-GEX™ compared to placebo in patients with metastatic or recurrent ovarian or fallopian tube carcinoma or primary peritoneal carcinoma.

    from randomization until end of treatment

  • Patient reported outcome

    from randomization until end of treatment

Study Arms (2)

PankoMab-GEX

EXPERIMENTAL

1700mg, i.v., q3w

Drug: PankoMab-GEX

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

matching placebo

Drug: Placebo

Interventions

start dose 500mg at C0D1, maintenance dose 1700mg at CxD1, Number of Cycles: until progression or unacceptable toxicity develops.

Also known as: Gatipotuzumab
PankoMab-GEX

start dose matching 500mg at C0D1, maintenance dose matching 1700mg at CxD1, Number of Cycles: until progression or unacceptable toxicity develops.

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Female patients ≥18 years of age
  • Histologically-confirmed, TA-MUC1-positive, recurrent epithelial ovarian, or fallopian-tube cancer or primary peritoneal cancer with high-grade (Grade 2 or 3) serous features or a serous component
  • Availability of tumor tissue samples (slices or block) for immune-histological confirmation of TA-MUC1 status (tissue samples could also be stored for other further specified biomarker assessments)
  • Patients were to have received at least 2 lines but not more than 5 lines of chemotherapy prior to start of maintenance treatment; neo-adjuvant lines did not count as previous lines of treatment
  • Patients had to have a documented response to or SD following the most recent line of chemotherapy (any regimen and duration in accordance with local or international guidelines or within IEC-approved studies) and received the last dose of said chemotherapy ≤6 weeks prior to randomization (response to prior chemotherapy was defined as a PR/CR according to radiological response criteria and/or a confirmed decline in tumor marker CA125 ≥50% from the pre-treatment value for patients who had a pre-treatment value ≥2 x the upper limit of normal \[ULN\]; SD was defined as stable disease according to radiological response criteria with a confirmed lack of increase in tumor marker CA125 from the pre-treatment value for patients who had a pre-treatment value ≥2 × ULN and no clinical progression). Prior to randomization, CA125 had to be below the ULN, or CA125 levels were not to increase \>15% within a time frame \>7 days if above the ULN
  • Progression-free interval of ≤12 months immediately preceding the chemotherapy to which the patient had just responded
  • Sensitive or resistant to the most recent platinum-based chemotherapy preceding the chemotherapy to which the patient had just responded (sensitivity was thereby defined as a recurrence of disease \>6 to ≤12 months after the end of platinum-based chemotherapy, and resistantance was defined as a recurrence of disease ≤6 months after the end of the platinum-based chemotherapy)
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤1
  • Recovered from all chemotherapy-related toxicities to Grade 1 or Grade 0 according to the NCI-CTCAE Version 4.0, with the exception of alopecia (any grade) and peripheral neuropathy (≤Grade 2)
  • Adequate bone marrow and hepatic function at Screening:
  • Hemoglobin ≥9 g/dL
  • White blood cell count ≥3.0 × 109/L
  • Absolute neutrophil count ≥1.5 × 109/L- Platelet count ≥100 × 109/L
  • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) \<3 × ULN (\<5 × ULN in case of liver metastases)
  • Bilirubin \<1.5 × ULN (\<3 × ULN in case of liver metastases)
  • +4 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Refractory to platinum-based chemotherapy (defined as remained progressive or became progressive under any previous platinum-based regimen)
  • Progression-free interval of \>12 months after the most recent antecedent platinum-based chemotherapy regimen
  • Concomitant anti-tumor therapy or immunotherapy
  • Treatment with monoclonal antibodies or investigational agents ≤30 days before randomization (prior anti-MUC1 therapy was not permitted at any time)
  • Limited-field radiotherapy ≤30 days before randomization (extensive prior radiotherapy during or following the last line of chemotherapy was not permitted; radiotherapy prior to the last line of chemotherapy was permitted)
  • Prior allergic reaction to a monoclonal antibody, Grade 3 IRR or any Grade 4 reaction to a monoclonal antibody
  • Known sensitivity to any component of the test product
  • Contraindication to the pre-medication used in this study (paracetamol/acetaminophen, H1 and/or H2 receptor antagonists, or steroids)
  • Clinical evidence of brain metastasis or leptomeningeal involvement
  • Patients with second primary cancer, except adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer, curatively treated in-situ cancer of the cervix, ductal carcinoma in situ, Stage 1 Grade 1 endometrial carcinoma, or other solid tumors including lymphomas (without bone marrow involvement) curatively treated with no evidence of disease for ≥5 years
  • Primary or secondary immune deficiency
  • Clinically active infections \>Grade 2 using NCI-CTCAE version 4.0
  • Active hepatitis B or C or infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
  • Myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to Screening
  • Symptomatic congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association Grade 3 or 4), unstable angina pectoris within 6 months prior to Screening, significant cardiac arrhythmia or history of stroke or transient ischemic attack within 1 year prior to Screening
  • +7 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (50)

Investigator

Berlin, 13353, Germany

Location

Investigator

Kiel, 24103, Germany

Location

Investigator

Munich, 80337, Germany

Location

Investigator

Munich, 81675, Germany

Location

Investigator

Regensburg, 91054, Germany

Location

Investigator

Stuttgart, 70376, Germany

Location

Investigator

Budapest, 1088, Hungary

Location

Investigator

Debrecen, 4035, Hungary

Location

Investigator

Szeged, 6720, Hungary

Location

Investigator

Meldola, 47014, Italy

Location

Investigator

Milan, 20133, Italy

Location

Investigator

Milan, 20141, Italy

Location

Investigator

Rome, 00168, Italy

Location

Investigator

Bydgoszcz, 85796, Poland

Location

Investigator

Gdansk, 80402, Poland

Location

Investigator

Lublin, 20090, Poland

Location

Investigator

Olsztyn, 10513, Poland

Location

Investigator

Poznan, 60569, Poland

Location

Investigator

Rzeszów, 35242, Poland

Location

Investigator

Brasov, 500091, Romania

Location

Investigator

Bucharest, 010825, Romania

Location

Investigator

Cluj-Napoca, 400015, Romania

Location

Investigator

Cluj-Napoca, 400058, Romania

Location

Investigator

Craiova, 200347, Romania

Location

Investigator

Oradea, 410469, Romania

Location

Investigator

Timișoara, 300167, Romania

Location

Investigator

Timișoara, 300239, Romania

Location

Investigator

Kazan', 450029, Russia

Location

Investigator

Moscow, 111123, Russia

Location

Investigator

Moscow, 115478, Russia

Location

Investigator

Moscow, 129128, Russia

Location

Investigator

Oryol, 302020, Russia

Location

Investigator

Pyatigorsk, 357502, Russia

Location

Investigator

Rostov-on-Don, 344037, Russia

Location

Investigator

Saint Petersburg, 188663, Russia

Location

Investigator

Saint Petersburg, 197758, Russia

Location

Investigator

Saint Petersburg, 198255, Russia

Location

Investigator

Volgograd, 404133, Russia

Location

Investigator

Yaroslavl, 150040, Russia

Location

Investigator

Barcelona, 08916, Spain

Location

Investigator

Madrid, 28007, Spain

Location

Investigator

Madrid, 28040, Spain

Location

Investigator

Madrid, 28041, Spain

Location

Investigator

Madrid, 28046, Spain

Location

Investigator

Madrid, 28223, Spain

Location

Investigator

Valencia, 46009, Spain

Location

Investigator

London, SW3 6JJ, United Kingdom

Location

Investigator

London, W1T 4TJ, United Kingdom

Location

Investigator

Northwood, HA6 2RN, United Kingdom

Location

Investigator

Sutton, SM2 5PT, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Ledermann JA, Zurawski B, Raspagliesi F, De Giorgi U, Arranz Arija J, Romeo Marin M, Lisyanskaya A, Poka RL, Markowska J, Cebotaru C, Casado Herraez A, Colombo N, Kutarska E, Hall M, Jacobs A, Ahrens-Fath I, Baumeister H, Zurlo A, Sehouli J. Maintenance therapy of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma with the anti-tumor-associated-mucin-1 antibody gatipotuzumab: results from a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, phase II study. ESMO Open. 2022 Feb;7(1):100311. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100311. Epub 2021 Dec 15.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fallopian Tube NeoplasmsOvarian Neoplasms

Interventions

PankoMab-GEX

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, FemaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsFallopian Tube DiseasesAdnexal DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital DiseasesEndocrine Gland NeoplasmsOvarian DiseasesEndocrine System DiseasesGonadal Disorders

Study Officials

  • Jonathan Ledermann, MD

    UCL Cancer Institute, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4TJ, UK

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 4, 2013

First Posted

July 15, 2013

Study Start

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion

April 20, 2017

Study Completion

July 28, 2017

Last Updated

October 22, 2020

Record last verified: 2020-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations