CTNAV II : Multicentric Evaluation of IMACTIS-CT Navigation System
Multicentric Evaluation of IMACTIS-CT Navigation System
2 other identifiers
interventional
464
1 country
9
Brief Summary
Estimate the medical service of a system of navigation (IMACTIS-CT®)in terms of SAFETY, EFFICIENCY and PERFORMANCE, in comparison with the reference method during gestures of interventional radiology under scan in the thoraco-abdominal level.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2013
Typical duration for not_applicable
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 5, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 11, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2016
CompletedJanuary 2, 2018
December 1, 2017
1.6 years
July 5, 2013
December 29, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Estimate the medical service of a system of navigation (IMACTIS-CT ®) in terms of SAFETY, EFFICIENCY and PERFORMANCE, in comparison with the reference method during interventional radiology gestures
Three criteria are estimated: * Safety: number of major complications (due to gesture) * Efficiency: number of targets achieved * Performance: number of scancontrol made during the puncture
2 hours
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Comparison of the duration of needle setting up procedure between IMACTIS-CT® and the reference method.
2 hours
Comparison (IMACTIS-CT ® vs References) of the operator satisfaction during his gesture.
2 hours
Comparison (IMACTIS-CT ® vs. Reference) of the radiation dose delivered during the puncture.
2 hours
Evaluation of delivered medical service by carrying out a sub-group analysis according to the stratification of the difficulty of gesture
2 hours
Evaluation of the navigation system use by the operators, based on needle holder localization files
2 hours
Study Arms (2)
Gesture performed under control tomodensitometric (CT)
ACTIVE COMPARATORConventional
Gesture performed under Navigation-assisted procedure (NAV)
EXPERIMENTALUse of the IMACTIS-CT® Navigation System
Interventions
Reference method for gestures (carried out under CT) guidance
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- More or equal the 18 years old
- Patient for whom an indication of diagnostic or therapeutic percutaneous interventional gesture in the thoraco-abdominal level under CT guidance is prescribed
- Patient affiliated to social security or similarly regime
- Patient signed consent for participation in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient with a medical device using a magnetic field (eg, patient with a pacemaker)
- Patient who presents ferromagnetic foreign bodies intracorporeal close to the working zone of Radiologist, and that can interact with the medical device
- Pregnant women and lactating mothers
- Ward of court or under guardianship
- Person deprived of freedom by judicial or administrative decision
- Person under legal protection
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (9)
University Hospital
Besançon, Doubs, 25030, France
University Hospital
Bordeaux, Gironde, 33604, France
Ambroise Paré University Hospital
Boulogne-Billancourt, Hauts-de-Seine, 92100, France
University Hospital
Rennes, Ille-et-Vilaine, 35033, France
University Hospital
Tours, Indre-et-Loire, 37044, France
University Hospital
Grenoble, Isère, 38043, France
University Hospital
Nancy, Meuse, 54511, France
University Hospital
Lille, Nord, 59037, France
University Hospital of Saint-Louis
Paris, 75475, France
Related Publications (1)
Rouchy RC, Moreau-Gaudry A, Chipon E, Aubry S, Pazart L, Lapuyade B, Durand M, Hajjam M, Pottier S, Renard B, Logier R, Orry X, Cherifi A, Quehen E, Kervio G, Favelle O, Patat F, De Kerviler E, Hughes C, Medici M, Ghelfi J, Mounier A, Bricault I. Evaluation of the clinical benefit of an electromagnetic navigation system for CT-guided interventional radiology procedures in the thoraco-abdominal region compared with conventional CT guidance (CTNAV II): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2017 Jul 6;18(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2049-6.
PMID: 28683837DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ivan Bricault, Pr
Radiology Departement - University Hospital of Grenoble
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eric Delabrousse, Pr
University Hospital of Besançon
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bruno Lapuyade, MD
University Hospital, Bordeaux
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pascal Lacombe, Pr
University Hospital of Garches
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Laurent Lemaitre, Pr
University Hospital of Lille
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Valérie Laurent, Pr
CHU NANCY
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jean-Yves Gauvrit, Pr
University Hospital of Rennes
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Olivier Favelle, MD
University Hospital of Tours
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Eric De Kerviler, Pr
University Hospital of Saint-Louis
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 5, 2013
First Posted
July 11, 2013
Study Start
December 1, 2013
Primary Completion
July 1, 2015
Study Completion
September 1, 2016
Last Updated
January 2, 2018
Record last verified: 2017-12