NCT01895738

Brief Summary

Youth injured by violence is a major public health concern in Canada. It is the fourth cause of death and the leading reason for a youth to visit an emergency department (ED). In Winnipeg, 20% of youth who visit an emergency department with an injury due to violence have a second visit for a subsequent violent injury within the following year. This is consistent with studies in other jurisdictions that demonstrate that violent injury is a chronic condition. Youth injured by violence are in a reflective and receptive state of mind, rendering the emergency department setting appropriate for intervention. The investigators propose a WrapAround Care model delivered by a support worker with lived experience with violence, supported by a social worker, an addictions and mental health counsellor, a family counsellor and links to multiple community partners. Support workers will be on call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week in order to start the intervention in the ED and take advantage of the "teachable moment". The proposed study is a pilot randomized control trial to assess the feasibility of a randomized control trial designed to assess efficacy. For the pilot trial the investigators will assess recruitment, treatment fidelity, participant adherence and safety. The intervention arm will receive wraparound care initiated at the time of their visit for injury due to violence. The control arm will receive standard of care (usually a list of community contacts). The investigators will use an adapted pre-consent randomization methodology. This intervention has been developed using a community based participatory research approach. Our team includes clinicians, nurses, social workers, community youth workers, ex-gang members, elders and researchers.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
133

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2013

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 4, 2013

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 10, 2013

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2013

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

March 14, 2018

Status Verified

March 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

July 4, 2013

Last Update Submit

March 13, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

TraumaInjuriesViolenceAdolescentWrapAround care

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Feasibility of Recruitment for Main Trial

    The investigators estimate that our sample size for the main trial must be 330 per arm (660 total) (Section 2.11). In order to ensure sufficient recruitment over 44 months plus 12 month follow-up for each subject and analysis time within a 5 year time frame, the investigators estimate that the investigators will need to randomize 180 youth to our pilot study in one year. This will also ensure that each support worker has an appropriate workload (approximately 2 new subjects per month with a maximum of 15 at any time). Successful Recruitment will be defined as \>180 participants in one year.

    One Year

  • Fidelity to Treatment Protocol

    The investigators have set the treatment protocol based on experience from our Proof of Concept study and our community partners. In behavioural interventions, fidelity measures are considered the quality control measure of ensuring the intervention is being implemented as intended. Fidelity preserves internal validity against type I and II errors, it improves power by decreasing the variability in treatment effect and allows replication, dissemination and implementation in practice. Successful Fidelity will be defined as \>85% of contacts (i.e. check-ins, phone calls, team meetings) attempted by the support worker.

    Two Years

  • Participant Adherence

    Participant adherence refers to both the receipt of the intervention (the development of a strong and effective alliance between the case manager and youth) and enacting on the intervention (accessing resources). In behavioural intervention studies it is important to demonstrate that the actual intervention is occurring as designed. If adherence to the intervention is not achieved, then our comparison of outcomes do not truly measure the difference between intervention and control. Successful Adherence will be assessed using the Working Alliance Inventory, which measures the bond between the support worker and participant and the agreement on tasks and goals set.

    Two Years

  • Serious Adverse Events

    Given youth injured by violence, especially those who are gang-involved are at high risk of retaliatory violence; investigators must ensure participants do not experience increased harm as part of the intervention. Program staff will discuss adverse events at each weekly meeting and workers and counselors will be required to fill in adverse event forms should they occur. These will be reviewed immediately with the principal investigator and if necessary the Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB). The DSMB will review a table of these adverse events and will review serious adverse events (e.g. death or otherwise deemed as serious) in detail. Stopping rules and guidelines are specified for the DSMB. The main stopping rule will be to stop the study if the treatment arm is significantly more likely to suffer a repeat violent injury (p\<0.05).

    Two Years

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • To determine the cost-effectiveness of the intervention

    Two Years

Other Outcomes (12)

  • To determine the impact on Visits to Hospital for Repeat Intentional Injury within one year

    Two Years

  • To determine the impact on # of repeat intentional injuries

    Two Years

  • To determine the impact on time to repeat intentional injury

    Two Years

  • +9 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

WrapAround Care

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants randomized to the intervention arm will be met in the emergency department by a support worker who has lived experience. They will start to build a relationship with the participant at that time (i.e. during the teachable moment) and will work with the participant for approximately one year, delivering WrapAround Care. Wraparound care is an established care model that starts with linking an individual with a support worker who works with them to address risk factors and enable the individual to make positive choices. It is hypothesized that by working with youth to address the risk factors in their control, the likelihood of future violence is reduced.

Behavioral: WrapAround Care

Standard of Care

NO INTERVENTION

Standard of Care is typically a sheet of community resources potentially handed out by the emergency physician, nurse or social worker.

Interventions

WrapAround CareBEHAVIORAL

Wraparound care is an established care model that starts with linking an individual with a support worker who works with them to address risk factors and enable the individual to make positive choices. It is hypothesized that by working with youth to address the risk factors in their control, the likelihood of future violence is reduced.

WrapAround Care

Eligibility Criteria

Age14 Years - 24 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 14 - 24 AND
  • Presentation with an injury caused by violence (defined as an injury inflicted by someone else and one of a gunshot wound, stab wound, injury due to blunt object, or injury due to bodily force)

You may not qualify if:

  • Unable to consent due to language or brain injury
  • Sexual assault (except those explicitly described as gang related - being "raped in or raped out" of a gang which is common with female gang members)
  • Child Abuse
  • Self-Inflicted Injury
  • Transfer from a hospital \> 1 hour from Winnipeg.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Winnipeg Health Sciences Centre

Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3P 3E4, Canada

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Snider C, Jiang D, Logsetty S, Strome T, Klassen T. Wraparound care for youth injured by violence: study protocol for a pilot randomised control trial. BMJ Open. 2015 May 19;5(5):e008088. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008088.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Wounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Carolyn Snider, MD MPH

    University of Manitoba

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 4, 2013

First Posted

July 10, 2013

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion

November 1, 2015

Study Completion

November 1, 2015

Last Updated

March 14, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-03

Locations