NCT01887184

Brief Summary

Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, like many other diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, may be associated with discomfort. Although upper endoscopy is usually of shorter duration and better tolerated by patients, most trials investigating the influence of analgesia and sedation have been performed on patients undergoing this procedure. Some patients may tolerate colonoscopy without sedation, but various techniques are used to limit discomfort and pain. Selection and dosing of sedatives depends on the patient's emotional state, the intensity of pain during examination, foreseeable technical difficulties, the endoscopist's experience, the presence or absence of anesthesia personnel, and hospital-specific procedures. Conscious sedation is a popular technique for colonoscopy and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The combination of an opioid and a benzodiazepine is known to provide good analgesic and sedative conditions during endoscopy. This combination of opioid and benzodiazepine, however, also increases the risk of respiratory depression. Therefore, pharmacologic agents which may provide adequate sedation without respiratory depression are of great interest to clinicians. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α2-adrenoceptor agonist with sedative and analgesic effects. Compared with clonidine, it is more selective for the α 2 adrenoceptor and acts as a full agonist in most pharmacologic test models. Potentially desirable properties include decreased requirements for other anesthetics and analgesics, a diminished sympathetic response to stress and the potential for cardioprotective effects against myocardial ischemia. When compared with conventional sedatives such as opioids or benzodiazepines, its lack of respiration depression is a distinct advantage. Previous studies using dexmedetomidine for sedation has been promising with maintenance of respiratory function. Patients are readily arousable. With intravenous slow bolus administration, there is a minimal increase in blood pressure initially, followed by a slight decrease in blood pressure. Lower dose ranges, avoidance of rapid bolus injection, and a slow rate of administration tend to decrease these circulatory side effects. Many clinical studies have shown that it can be well and safely used intravenously, intramuscularly and transdermally. Although not an officially technique, there are also reports of intranasal administration resulting in fairly predictable onset in both adults and children.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2009

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2009

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2010

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2010

Completed
3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 2, 2013

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 26, 2013

Completed
11 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 11, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

July 11, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

April 2, 2013

Results QC Date

May 16, 2024

Last Update Submit

July 9, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Consumption of Rescue Patient Controlled Propofol

    Until the removal of the endoscopy from the patients

    Up to 30 minutes during gastrointestinal endoscopy

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Side Effects of Intrananasal Dexmedetomidine

    Up to 24 hours after Upper Endoscopy

Study Arms (2)

Normal Saline

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Normal saline was given intranasally

Drug: Placebo

Dexmedetomidine

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

1.5mcg dexmedetomidine was given intranasally before procedure

Drug: Dexmedetomidine

Interventions

Dexmedetomidine 1.5mcg/kg was given intranasally

Also known as: Dexmedetomidine (Hospira)
Dexmedetomidine

Intranasal saline was given

Normal Saline

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • American Society of Anesthesiology grade I-III
  • years old
  • Patients having upper endoscopy

You may not qualify if:

  • Clinical history or electrocardiographic evidence of heart block, ischaemic - heart disease, asthma, sleep apnoea syndrome
  • BMI \> 35kg/m2
  • Impaired liver (preoperative serum albumin level less than 30g/L ) or renal function (creatinine \>120umol/L)) or known renal or hepatic disease
  • Alcohol consumption in excess of 28 units per week
  • Pregnancy
  • Patient refusal
  • Known psychiatric illness
  • Chronic sedative use, and regular use of or known allergy to dexmedetomidine, propofol and opioids.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Gastrointestinal Diseases

Interventions

Dexmedetomidine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Digestive System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ImidazolesAzolesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Results Point of Contact

Title
Professor Chi Wai Cheung
Organization
The University of Hong Kong

Study Officials

  • Chi Wai Cheung, MBBS, MD

    Department of Anaesthesiology, the University of Hong Kong

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 2, 2013

First Posted

June 26, 2013

Study Start

January 1, 2009

Primary Completion

March 1, 2010

Study Completion

April 1, 2010

Last Updated

July 11, 2024

Results First Posted

July 11, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07