NCT01887041

Brief Summary

To compare the quality of life (QoL) in patients receiving a bilioenteric anastomosis vs. endoscopical stenting for palliation of biliary obstruction due to locally unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer. In the past, endoscopy seems to have been favoured based on older studies, but with new chemotherapeutic regimens available, the likelihood to experience stent complications has increased. Therefore, the issue as to which palliation should be favoured has to be reconsidered.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
24

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2010

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2010

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 24, 2013

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 26, 2013

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2015

Completed
Last Updated

July 5, 2022

Status Verified

June 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

5.9 years

First QC Date

June 24, 2013

Last Update Submit

June 28, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Advanced, metastasising pancreatic head carcinomaJaundiceBiliodigestive anastomosisEndoscopically inserted biliary tract drainageQuality of Life

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Outcome of Quality of Life.

    2 1/2 years

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • The incidence of surgical complications and complications, with regard to the endo-scopic stent insertion, are further aspects that shall be examined in this study.

    2 1/2 years

Study Arms (2)

Stent

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Arm B, after randomisation the biliary tract stents shall remain. The patients in study arm B will also receive chemotherapy and gemcitabine, according to the recommended palliative therapy for a pancreas carcinoma.

Procedure: Stent

Biliodigestive anastomosis

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Study arm A will, after randomisation, have a biliodigestive anastomosis inserted. After the healing of the wound (al least 14 days postoperative) the treatment using gemcitabine, according to the plan mentioned below. Gemcitabine shall be administered on days 1, 8 and 15 of each 4 week cycle. The cycle is defined as a weekly, over a period of 3 consecutive weeks, applied infusions, followed by 1 week pause. On the day of therapy a dosage of 1000 mg/ml body surface shall be administered, intravenous, over a period of 30 minutes.

Procedure: Biliodigestive anastomosis

Interventions

StentPROCEDURE

Endoscopically inserted biliary tract drainage

Stent

Biliodigestive anastomosis

Biliodigestive anastomosis

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patient with local, advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas head and jaundice.
  • Performance-status of 50 or above on the Karnofsky-scale (see attachment).
  • Adequate bone marrow reserves: leukocyte level \> 3.5 x 10´/l, thrombocyte level level \> 100 x 10/l; Haemoglobin\> 80g/l.
  • Male or female patients, at least 18 years old.
  • Women of child bearing age must be sufficient protected against pregnancy (contraception) during and for 3 months after the end of the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Adult patients with focal, advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas head and no jaundice; also no jaundice in their anamnesis and with no endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreaticography (ERCP)-induced intervention.
  • Pregnancy
  • Breast feeding
  • Contra-indication for gemcitabine

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Universtätsklinik Hamburg-Eppendorf

Hamburg, 20246, Germany

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neoplasm MetastasisJaundice

Interventions

Stents

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplastic ProcessesNeoplasmsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsHyperbilirubinemiaSkin ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Prostheses and ImplantsEquipment and Supplies

Study Officials

  • Jacob R Izbicki, MD

    Universitätsklinik Hamburg

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2013

First Posted

June 26, 2013

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion

December 1, 2015

Study Completion

December 1, 2015

Last Updated

July 5, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Due to premature termination of the study, no individual participant data will be shared.

Locations