NCT01885000

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the patient-reported outcomes (feedbacks of patients)of a new drug for the treatment of erythema of rosacea (central facial redness). The feedback of patients receiving the active drug will be compared to the feedback of patients receiving the placebo.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
92

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2013

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
3 countries

14 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 20, 2013

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 24, 2013

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2013

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 14, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 14, 2013

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 13, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

August 25, 2021

Status Verified

August 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

June 20, 2013

Results QC Date

November 17, 2016

Last Update Submit

August 23, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Percentage of Participants Who Are Very Satisfied/Satisfied/Somewhat Satisfied With the Overall Study Treatment

    Percentage of participants who are very satisfied/satisfied/somewhat satisfied with the study treatment were reported.

    Day 8

  • Percentage of Participants With Facial Redness Questionnaire at Day 8

    Percentage of participants for each category of facial redness questionnaire on Day 8 was reported. Facial redness questionnaire included 12 questions/categories 1. Satisfied with appearance, 2. Appearance acceptable, 3. Appearance concerned, 4. Embarrassed with facial redness, 5. Self-conscious, 6. Frequency control last 24 hours, 7. Frustrated, 8. Cover up or camouflage, 9. Pay attention to the known triggers, 10. Avoid the known triggers, 11. Interfering with social life, 12. Interfering with work life.

    Day 8

  • EuroQuality of Life-5 Dimensional-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Questionnaire at Day 8

    EQ-5D-3L is a 3-level, 5-dimensional format standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome used to assess the impact of study treatments on participants quality of life as follows: 1) mobility; 2) self-care; 3) usual activities; 4) pain/discomfort; 5) anxiety/depression. Each dimension comprises 3 levels with corresponding numeric scores, where 1 indicates no problems, and 3 indicates extreme problems. Participant selects answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his/her health today with anchors ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). An increase in the EQ-5D-3L total score indicates improvement.

    Day 8

  • Percent Change From Baseline in Total Score of Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Questionnaire at Day 8

    DLQI was a compact health-related quality of life index that has 10 questions and depends on the participants self-declaration about experiences during the previous week. DLQI results range between grades 0 and 30. \[Grade 0-1\]: No effect at all on participant's life, \[Grade 2-5\]: Small effect at all on participant's life, \[Grade 6-10\]: Moderate effect at all on participant's life, \[Grade 11-20\]: Very large effect at all on participant's life, \[Grade 21-30\]: Extremely large effect at all on participant's life. As the DLQI scores increase, the impact of the studied disease on life becomes greater.

    Baseline, Day 8

  • Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensional-3 Level (EQ-5D-3L) Questionnaire (Along With a Visual Analogue Score for the Overall Health State) at Day 8

    EQ-5D-3L is a 3-level, 5-dimensional format standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome used to assess the impact of study treatments on participants quality of life as follows: 1) mobility; 2) self-care; 3) usual activities; 4) pain/discomfort; 5) anxiety/depression. Each dimension comprises 3 levels with corresponding numeric scores, where 1 indicates no problems, and 3 indicates extreme problems. Participant selects answer for each of 5 dimensions considering response that best matches his/her health today with anchors ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). An increase in the EQ-5D-3L total score indicates improvement.

    Day 8

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Percentage of Participants With at Least Two Grade Improvement in the Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA)

    Day 8

  • Percentage of Participants With at Least Two Grade Improvement in the Participant Self-assessment

    Day 8

  • Change From Baseline in Facial Inflammatory Lesion Counts at Day 8

    Day 8

  • Number of Participants Reported Adverse Events

    From start of study drug administration up to Day 8

Study Arms (2)

Brimonidine tartrate 0.5% gel

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants applied brimonidine tartrate 0.5% gel topically once daily for 8 days.

Drug: Brimonidine tartrate was applied cutaneously once daily for 8 days.

Vehicle

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Participants applied brimonidine tartrate vehicle gel topically once daily for 8 days.

Drug: Brimonidine tartrate vehicle was applied cutaneously once daily for 8 days.

Interventions

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Male or female subjects age of 18 years or older
  • A clinical diagnosis of facial rosacea
  • A Patient Self-Assessment score of 4 (severe) at Baseline prior to the study drug application
  • A Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) score of 3 (moderate) or 4 (severe) at Baseline prior to the study drug application

You may not qualify if:

  • More than 5 facial inflammatory lesions (papules or pustules) of rosacea
  • Any uncontrolled chronic or serious disease or medical condition that may either interfere with the interpretation of the clinical trial results, or put the subject at significant risk if the subject participates in the clinical trial as judged by the investigator
  • Known or suspected allergies or sensitivities to any component of the study drugs, including the active ingredient brimonidine tartrate (see Investigator's Brochure)
  • Female who is pregnant or lactating

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (14)

Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie

Berlin, Germany

Location

Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf

Düsseldorf, Germany

Location

Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität

Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Location

Universitätsklinikum Münster, Klinik für Hautkrankheiten

Münster, Germany

Location

Universitäts-Hautklinik Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen

Tübingen, Germany

Location

CentroDerm Gesellschaft für dermatolgische Forschung mbH (GmbH)

Wuppertal, Germany

Location

Zentrum für Dermatologie, Allergologie und Dermatochirurgie

Wuppertal, Germany

Location

Capio Citykliniken

Lund, Sweden

Location

Läkarhuset Odenplan

Stockholm, Sweden

Location

NHS Tayside

Dundee, DD1 9SY, United Kingdom

Location

University Hospitals of Leicester

Leicester, United Kingdom

Location

Royal Free Hospital

London, United Kingdom

Location

Whipps Cross University Hospital

London, United Kingdom

Location

Harrogate District Hospital

Yorkshire, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Layton AM, Schaller M, Homey B, Hofmann MA, Bewley AP, Lehmann P, Nohlgard C, Sarwer DB, Kerrouche N, Ma YM. Brimonidine gel 0.33% rapidly improves patient-reported outcomes by controlling facial erythema of rosacea: a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Dec;29(12):2405-10. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13305. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

RosaceaErythema

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Skin DiseasesSkin and Connective Tissue DiseasesSkin ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Clinical Operations
Organization
Galderma

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 20, 2013

First Posted

June 24, 2013

Study Start

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion

November 14, 2013

Study Completion

November 14, 2013

Last Updated

August 25, 2021

Results First Posted

January 13, 2017

Record last verified: 2021-08

Locations