NCT01883128

Brief Summary

Radiotherapy is the commonest form of prostate cancer treatment in the UK. In one in four men, radiotherapy will fail to control the cancer. These men are offered hormonal treatment which has significant side effects. Few men are offered a further treatment such as surgery, HIFU or cryotherapy. Only half of these men are cancer free at 5 years. The investigators believe this is due to poor imaging tests such as CT and Bone scan that cannot accurately detect whether cancer has come back inside or outside of the prostate or both. Also radiotherapy damages tissue surrounding the prostate which affects tissue healing for example after surgery. Treating just the cancer in the prostate only (focal treatment) rather than the whole prostate may limit this damage and cause fewer side-effects. The investigators want to see if new imaging tests can better identify cancer that has spread outside of the prostate and areas of cancer inside the prostate. Our new tests are whole-body MRI (for distant disease) and MRI guided biopsies (MRI-TB) (for local disease). First, the investigators will compare the results of whole-body MRI to existing imaging tests (bone-scan, and choline PET/CT) that try to find distant spread. Second, the investigators will compare the results of MRI-TB to a very detailed and accurate biopsy of the prostate called template prostate mapping which will show us where and how aggressive the cancer is. Third, if the cancer is confined to the prostate, the investigators will treat men using focal salvage therapies HIFU and cryotherapy. The investigators believe that these new imaging tests could better identify those who will benefit from early hormone treatment and those who will benefit from local salvage treatment. Our study may help justify carrying out a larger trial looking at how good the treatment is in controlling cancer in the medium and long-term.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
177

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2014

Longer than P75 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 18, 2013

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 21, 2013

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2014

Completed
5.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

May 10, 2017

Status Verified

May 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

5.5 years

First QC Date

June 18, 2013

Last Update Submit

May 8, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Biochemical FailureRadiotherapyRadiorecurrent Prostate CancerMRI ProstateWhole Body MRIBone ScanCholine PETFocal Salvage TreatmentHIFUCryotherapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Accuracy of whole body MRI in identifying distant disease

    Whole body MRI lesions suspicious of lymph node, visceral or bone metastases compared to standard care tests \- Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of whole-body MRI to detect distant disease compared to standard care tests (isotope bone-scan, PET/CT-scan, with skeletal survey where appropriate) and/or pelvic lymphadenectomy and/or biopsy of distant areas in indeterminate cases

    2 years

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Can multiparametric MRI accurately detect localised recurrent prostate cancer

    2 years

Other Outcomes (1)

  • To determine urinary incontinence rates after focal salvage therapy to localised recurrent prostate cancer?

    2 years

Study Arms (3)

Whole body MRI

EXPERIMENTAL

Comparing the detection rate of metastases of whole body MRI compared to current standard of care tests - Choline PET and Bone scan.

Device: Whole Body MRI

MRI Targeted Biopsies

EXPERIMENTAL

Transperineal MRI-targeted biopsies and whole-gland transperineal prostate mapping biopsies

Procedure: MRI Targeted biopsies

Focal Salvage Therapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Focal salvage HIFU and cryotherapy of recurrent prostate cancer tumors only

Procedure: Focal Salvage Therapy

Interventions

Full parametric MRI using T1W, T2W, Diffusion-weighted and dynamic-contrast-enhanced images at 3Tesla

Also known as: Philips Ingenia 3.0T Magnetic Resonance System, CE0344
Whole body MRI

Cryotherapy and HIFU will be used to targeted the areas of tumor only with a margin of normal tissue.

Also known as: HIFU Device name: Sonablate 500, HIFU Device Serial Number 1049, Cryotherapy Device Name: Seed Net Gold, Cryotherapy Serial Number: Cat No FPRCH 2024
Focal Salvage Therapy

Image registration will be used to target biopsies followed by full mapping biopsies of the prostate. All biopsies will be carried out transperineally

Also known as: SmartTarget software for image-registration
MRI Targeted Biopsies

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Previous external beam radiotherapy with or without neo-adjuvant/adjuvant hormone therapy
  • Biochemical failure as defined by the Phoenix criteria (PSA nadir + 2ng/ml)
  • Men considering local salvage treatment for radio-recurrent disease
  • Life expectancy of 5 years or more

You may not qualify if:

  • Have taken any form of hormones (except 5-alpha reductase inhibitors) within the previous 6 months
  • Unable to have MRI scan as defined by standard care practice
  • Metallic implant likely to cause artefact and reduce scan quality
  • PSA doubling time of 3 months or less
  • PSA value 20ng/ml or greater
  • Prior prostate biopsies following biochemical failure
  • Any prior local intervention to the prostate (e.g., laser/electrical resection or incision, cryotherapy, HIFU, any other ablative modality, any other radiotherapy, any other prostate injection therapy for symptoms or cancer control)
  • Unable to have general or regional anaesthesia
  • Unable to give informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Hampshire Hospitals NHS Trust

London, NW1 2BU, United Kingdom

RECRUITING

University College London Hospitals

London, NW1 2BU, United Kingdom

RECRUITING

Related Publications (3)

  • Light A, Kanthabalan A, Otieno M, Pavlou M, Omar R, Adeleke S, Giganti F, Brew-Graves C, Williams NR, Emara A, Haroon A, Latifoltojar A, Sidhu H, Freeman A, Orczyk C, Nikapota A, Dudderidge T, Hindley RG, Virdi J, Arya M, Payne H, Mitra AV, Bomanji J, Winkler M, Horan G, Moore CM, Emberton M, Punwani S, Ahmed HU, Shah TT. The Role of Multiparametric MRI and MRI-targeted Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer: An Analysis from the FORECAST Trial. Eur Urol. 2024 Jan;85(1):35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.09.001. Epub 2023 Sep 29.

  • Light A, Peters M, Reddy D, Kanthabalan A, Otieno M, Pavlou M, Omar R, Adeleke S, Giganti F, Brew-Graves C, Williams NR, Emara A, Haroon A, Latifoltojar A, Sidhu H, Freeman A, Orczyk C, Nikapota A, Dudderidge T, Hindley RG, Virdi J, Arya M, Payne H, Mitra AV, Bomanji J, Winkler M, Horan G, Moore C, Emberton M, Punwani S, Ahmed HU, Shah TT. External validation of a risk model predicting failure of salvage focal ablation for prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2023 Nov;132(5):520-530. doi: 10.1111/bju.16102. Epub 2023 Jun 29.

  • Shah TT, Kanthabalan A, Otieno M, Pavlou M, Omar R, Adeleke S, Giganti F, Brew-Graves C, Williams NR, Grierson J, Miah H, Emara A, Haroon A, Latifoltojar A, Sidhu H, Clemente J, Freeman A, Orczyk C, Nikapota A, Dudderidge T, Hindley RG, Virdi J, Arya M, Payne H, Mitra A, Bomanji J, Winkler M, Horan G, Moore CM, Emberton M, Punwani S, Ahmed HU. Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Targeted Biopsies Compared to Transperineal Mapping Biopsies Before Focal Ablation in Localised and Metastatic Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radiotherapy. Eur Urol. 2022 Jun;81(6):598-605. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.02.022. Epub 2022 Mar 31.

Study Officials

  • Hashim U Ahmed, FRCS, PhD

    University College London Hospitals

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Manit Arya, FRCS

    University College London Hospitals

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Mark Emberton, FRCS, MD

    University College London Hospitals

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Shonit Punwani, FRCR

    University College London Hospitals

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Abi A Kanthabalan, MBChB

CONTACT

Hashim U Ahmed, FRCS, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Whole-body MRI and Focal salvage therapy
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MRC Clinician Scientist and Clinical Lecturer in Urology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2013

First Posted

June 21, 2013

Study Start

April 1, 2014

Primary Completion

October 1, 2019

Study Completion

October 1, 2019

Last Updated

May 10, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-05

Locations