A Prospective Study Comparing Telescopic vs. Balloon Dissection in Single Incision Laparoscopic Inguinal Herniorraphy (SILTELESCOPIC)
SILTelescopic
1 other identifier
observational
102
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Our recent prospective randomized controlled study comparing single-port vs. multiport laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal herniorraphy (NCT 01660048) demonstrated superiority of the single-port technique in reducing post-op pain/analgesic requirements, quicker return to work/normal physical activities and improved cosmetic scar scores. During this study all patients underwent the initial extraperitoneal dissection with the distension balloon. However, the balloon itself costs AU $380 per device which represents a significant percentage of the overall cost of the procedure (when the hospital/operating rooms cost is approximately AU $2500 for a unilateral laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair) especially if only unilateral inguinal herniorraphy is performed. The European Hernia Society Guidelines encourage the use of the distension balloon for the initial distension/dissection of the extraperitoneal space especially during the learning curve. This recommendation arises from the fact that during the conventional multiport repair the umbilical port allows only the insertion of the laparoscope and the extraperitoneal space cannot easily be dissected with the scope itself, especially in patients with well-developed linea alba extending down to the pubic symphysis, and the camera itself, if used as dissection device, would become smudged and it would have to be repeatedly withdrawn for cleaning. Yet this must occur since the extraperitoneal space must be dissected in the midline sufficiently for safe insertion of two additional 5 mm ports for insertion of dissecting instruments in order to complete the extraperitoneal space dissection and the repair. With single incision laparoscopic surgery the use of the Triport™ system ensure that the port can be place under direct vision into the extraperitoneal space when the scope and two dissecting instruments can be safely inserted at the outset. In this way the extraperitoneal space can be dissected under direct vision. The balloon dissection is essentially a blind dissection even though the balloon distension is being observed by the scope, incorrect tissue planes can be entered ie the dissection can occur below the pre-peritoneal fascia exposing the nerves in the groin with the potential risks for nerve damage and entrapment. This is an argument that surgeons who practise transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair use to justify their superior technique over the TEP repair because, in the TAPP repair, the peritoneum is carefully dissected free from and leaving the underlying preperitoneal fascia intact. While the use of the balloon, when some 25 "pumps" of air are used during the insufflation, to create a significant space to place not only the two 5 mm ports but also to create a significant extraperitoneal dissection when usually only the lateral space and the hernia sac need to be dissected this is not always possible. In patients who have had previous lower abdominal surgery including previous anterior inguinal herniorraphy (especially if the mesh plug is used) the balloon dissention is normally judicious as one cannot predict whether there are any significant peritoneal or even bowel adhesions. Consequently, in such cases, the balloon distension is normally confined to an area just inferior to the umbilical port and superior to the pubic symphysis so that there is just enough extraperitoneal dissection to place the two 5 mm trocars. Usually this means only using only 5 pumps of air in the distension balloon for placement of two 5 mm trocars. Then the dissection of the extraperitonealy space under direct vision can take place. The use of the distension balloon in such cases represents an enormous waste of resources since AU $380 is spent just to create enough space to place the two 5 mm ports and hence allowing the insertion of the dissecting instruments. With the Triport+™ port the dissecting instruments can easily be placed in the extraperitoneal space and the dissection can begin under direct vision hence achieving the same safe dissection that TAPP surgeons claim to perform. In this study we aim to look at the safety and efficacy of telescopic vs. balloon dissection by prospectively comparing a similar former group of patients to the ones who had previously undergone single-port inguinal herniorraphy with balloon dissection in our previous study (NCT 01660048). All patients having surgical treatment of groin hernia at St Luke's and Holroyd Private Hospitals are subject to very careful assessment and study. All patients are requested to report immediately if there are any problems.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Feb 2013
Typical duration for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 16, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 21, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2015
CompletedApril 4, 2014
April 1, 2014
1.2 years
June 16, 2013
April 3, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post-op pain
Post-op pain measured on day 1 and 7 using the visual analogue score of 0 to 10
measured on day 1 and day 7
Secondary Outcomes (10)
• Conversion to multiport or open operation
up to one year
• Length of hospital stay
up to one year
operation time
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 1 day
Analgesic requirements
up to one week
return to work or normal physical activities
up to one year
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Telescopic group
All eligible patients referred with inguinal/femoral hernias will be enrolled into the study from February 2013
Eligibility Criteria
All eligible patients referred with inguinal/femoral hernias from February 2013 will be enrolled into the study
You may qualify if:
- \- all patients referred with inguinal/femoral hernias
You may not qualify if:
- workers Compensation cases
- previous extraperitoneal intervention
- unfit for a general anaesthetic
- strangulated hernias
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The Sydney Hernia Specialists Cliniclead
- University of Sydneycollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Holroyd Private Hospital
Guildford, New South Wales, 2161, Australia
St Luke's Hospital
Potts Point, New South Wales, 2011, Australia
Related Publications (4)
Tran H. Safety and efficacy of single incision laparoscopic surgery for total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. JSLS. 2011 Jan-Mar;15(1):47-52. doi: 10.4293/108680811X13022985131174.
PMID: 21902942RESULTTran H. Robotic single-port hernia surgery. JSLS. 2011 Jul-Sep;15(3):309-14. doi: 10.4293/108680811X13125733356198.
PMID: 21985715RESULTTran H. Safety and efficacy of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for abdominal wall hernias. JSLS. 2012 Apr-Jun;16(2):242-9. doi: 10.4293/108680812x13427982376301.
PMID: 23477172RESULTTran H, Tran K, Turingan I, Zajkowska M, Lam V, Hawthorne W. Single-incision laparoscopic inguinal herniorraphy with telescopic extraperitoneal dissection: technical aspects and potential benefits. Hernia. 2015 Jun;19(3):407-16. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1349-6. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
PMID: 25644488DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Wayne J Hawthorne, MD
The Unviversity of Sydney
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 12 Months
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 16, 2013
First Posted
June 21, 2013
Study Start
February 1, 2013
Primary Completion
April 1, 2014
Study Completion
April 1, 2015
Last Updated
April 4, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-04