Influence of Tracheostomy on Lung Deposition in Spontaneously Breathing Patient
1 other identifier
interventional
9
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compare lung deposition of amikacin in two settings: spontaneously breathing through a tracheostomy cannula and through the mouth.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2009
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 18, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 20, 2013
CompletedJune 20, 2013
June 1, 2013
Same day
June 18, 2013
June 18, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Amikacin urinary drug concentration
At each micturition during 24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Nebulization through the tracheostomy
EXPERIMENTALEach subjects received two nebulization sessions. The first session was performed prior the tracheostomy removal (through the tracheostomy) and the second one when the when the tracheostome was totally scared (through the mouth)
Nebulization through the mouth
ACTIVE COMPARATOREach subjects received two nebulization sessions. The first session was performed prior the tracheostomy removal (through the tracheostomy) and the second one when the when the tracheostome was totally scared (through the mouth)
Interventions
Each subject received two nebulization sessions under spontaneous breathing in a sitting position. The first session was performed prior to tracheostomy removal. During the first nebulization, subjects inhaled the aerosol through the tracheostomy, cuff inflated and inner cannula removed.
Each subject received two nebulization sessions under spontaneous breathing in a sitting position. The second nebulization was performed when the tracheostome was totally scarred. During the second nebulization, subjects inhaled the aerosol a mouth piece and wore a nose clip.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient who were likely to require an elective tracheostomy surgery as part as their head and neck surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy to Aminoglycosides
- Patients who received Aminoglycosides treatment less than one month prior the surgery
- Pectoralis major flap reconstruction
- Latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
Brussels, 1200, Belgium
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor in physiotherapy
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 18, 2013
First Posted
June 20, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2009
Primary Completion
January 1, 2009
Study Completion
September 1, 2011
Last Updated
June 20, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-06