NCT01881776

Brief Summary

The investigators undertook this prospective, randomized trial to compare the recovery profile throughout the first postoperative week in patients receiving continuous (CISB) interscalene brachial plexus block, single injection (SISB), or general anesthesia (GA) for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. Specifically, the effects of the three anesthetic techniques when used intraoperatively as a sole anesthesia modality were studied on postoperative pain, time-to-first pain, analgesic consumption, fast-tracked PACU bypass rate, length of PACU stay, time-to-discharge home, sleep duration, and related adverse effects. The investigators hypothesized that CISB results in a superior postoperative recovery profile as compared to SISB or GA alone.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
71

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for early_phase_1 postoperative-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2011

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2011

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2012

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 26, 2013

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 20, 2013

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 4, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

June 4, 2014

Status Verified

July 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

February 26, 2013

Results QC Date

July 11, 2013

Last Update Submit

May 5, 2014

Conditions

Keywords

Single injection interscalene brachial plexus blockContinuous interscalene brachial plexus blockGeneral anesthesiaPostoperative painRecovery profile

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Patients With Pain: Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11(0-10): 0:no Pain and 10:Severe/Worst Pain) ≥ 4

    The effects of the three anesthetic techniques (continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (CISB), single interscalene brachial plexus block (SISB), or general anesthesia (GA)) when used intraoperatively as a sole anesthesia modality were studied on postoperative pain (highest NRS pain rating)

    throughout the first postoperative week on days 1, 2, 3, and 7

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Time-to-first Pain

    throughout the first postoperative week

  • The Number of Patients Consume ≥1 Dose of Analgesics

    throughout the first postoperative week

Other Outcomes (4)

  • Fast-tracked Postoperative Care Unit (PACU) Bypass Patient Number

    throughout the first postoperative week (how many patients left PACU immediately just after the operation)

  • Length of PACU Stay

    throughout the first postoperative week (how long patients stayed in PACU just after the operation)

  • Time to Discharge Home

    throughout the first postoperative week (how long patients stayed in the hospital (includes PACU and hospital time)

  • +1 more other outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Single ISB (SISB) group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients in this group received single injection (SISB) interscalene brachial plexus block

Procedure: ISB

Continuous ISB (CISB) group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients in this group received continuous (CISB) interscalene brachial plexus block

Procedure: ISB

General anesthesia (GA) group

NO INTERVENTION

Patients in this group received general anesthesia (GA)

Interventions

ISBPROCEDURE

In SISB group; a 5 cm block needle (Stimuplex®A, B Braun Medical, Bethlehem, PA) was inserted in-plane in order to place the needle tip between the upper and middle trunks of the brachial plexus (C5-C6). 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine was injected through the needle. For CISB, a 5cm stimulating needle (Contiplex® Tuohy, B. Braun Medical, Bethlehem, PA) was inserted in-plane in order to place the needle tip between the upper and middle trunks of the brachial plexus (C5-C6). A nonstimulating catheter was inserted approximately 3 cm beyond the tip of the needle. 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine was injected through the catheter.

Also known as: SISB needle (Stimuplex®A, B Braun), CISB needle and catheter (Contiplex® Tuohy, B. Braun)
Continuous ISB (CISB) groupSingle ISB (SISB) group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III patients
  • ≥ 18 years of age BMI ≤ 35 kg/m2 Scheduled for elective arthroscopic shoulder surgery

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who were undertaken open shoulder procedures Patients with difficulty understanding the instructions for using the anesthetic infusion pump and/or pain scales Patients with contraindications to regional anesthesia (e.g., allergy to a local anesthetic (LA), local infection, coagulopathy) Patients with significant neurologic disorders of the upper extremity, psychiatric or cognitive disorders, history of substance abuse or chronic opioid use

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

St Luke's Roosevelt Hospital Center

New York, New York, 10025, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Salviz EA, Xu D, Frulla A, Kwofie K, Shastri U, Chen J, Shariat AN, Littwin S, Lin E, Choi J, Hobeika P, Hadzic A. Continuous interscalene block in patients having outpatient rotator cuff repair surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Anesth Analg. 2013 Dec;117(6):1485-92. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000436607.40643.0a.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Interventions

Catheters

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Equipment and Supplies

Limitations and Caveats

1\. It was difficult to keep three different groups blinded. 2. The resting and mobilization highest/worst NRS pain scores were ignored and only the highest pain scores of the postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7 were recorded.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr.Admir Hadzic
Organization
StLukeNY

Study Officials

  • Admir Hadzic, MD,PhD,Prof

    St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
early phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2013

First Posted

June 20, 2013

Study Start

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion

June 1, 2012

Study Completion

June 1, 2012

Last Updated

June 4, 2014

Results First Posted

June 4, 2014

Record last verified: 2013-07

Locations