Continuous Interscalene Block Results in Superior Recovery Throughout the First Postoperative Week
1 other identifier
interventional
71
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators undertook this prospective, randomized trial to compare the recovery profile throughout the first postoperative week in patients receiving continuous (CISB) interscalene brachial plexus block, single injection (SISB), or general anesthesia (GA) for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery. Specifically, the effects of the three anesthetic techniques when used intraoperatively as a sole anesthesia modality were studied on postoperative pain, time-to-first pain, analgesic consumption, fast-tracked PACU bypass rate, length of PACU stay, time-to-discharge home, sleep duration, and related adverse effects. The investigators hypothesized that CISB results in a superior postoperative recovery profile as compared to SISB or GA alone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for early_phase_1 postoperative-pain
Started Aug 2011
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 26, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 20, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 4, 2014
CompletedJune 4, 2014
July 1, 2013
10 months
February 26, 2013
July 11, 2013
May 5, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patients With Pain: Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11(0-10): 0:no Pain and 10:Severe/Worst Pain) ≥ 4
The effects of the three anesthetic techniques (continuous interscalene brachial plexus block (CISB), single interscalene brachial plexus block (SISB), or general anesthesia (GA)) when used intraoperatively as a sole anesthesia modality were studied on postoperative pain (highest NRS pain rating)
throughout the first postoperative week on days 1, 2, 3, and 7
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Time-to-first Pain
throughout the first postoperative week
The Number of Patients Consume ≥1 Dose of Analgesics
throughout the first postoperative week
Other Outcomes (4)
Fast-tracked Postoperative Care Unit (PACU) Bypass Patient Number
throughout the first postoperative week (how many patients left PACU immediately just after the operation)
Length of PACU Stay
throughout the first postoperative week (how long patients stayed in PACU just after the operation)
Time to Discharge Home
throughout the first postoperative week (how long patients stayed in the hospital (includes PACU and hospital time)
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Single ISB (SISB) group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this group received single injection (SISB) interscalene brachial plexus block
Continuous ISB (CISB) group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this group received continuous (CISB) interscalene brachial plexus block
General anesthesia (GA) group
NO INTERVENTIONPatients in this group received general anesthesia (GA)
Interventions
In SISB group; a 5 cm block needle (Stimuplex®A, B Braun Medical, Bethlehem, PA) was inserted in-plane in order to place the needle tip between the upper and middle trunks of the brachial plexus (C5-C6). 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine was injected through the needle. For CISB, a 5cm stimulating needle (Contiplex® Tuohy, B. Braun Medical, Bethlehem, PA) was inserted in-plane in order to place the needle tip between the upper and middle trunks of the brachial plexus (C5-C6). A nonstimulating catheter was inserted approximately 3 cm beyond the tip of the needle. 20 mL 0.5% ropivacaine was injected through the catheter.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III patients
- ≥ 18 years of age BMI ≤ 35 kg/m2 Scheduled for elective arthroscopic shoulder surgery
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who were undertaken open shoulder procedures Patients with difficulty understanding the instructions for using the anesthetic infusion pump and/or pain scales Patients with contraindications to regional anesthesia (e.g., allergy to a local anesthetic (LA), local infection, coagulopathy) Patients with significant neurologic disorders of the upper extremity, psychiatric or cognitive disorders, history of substance abuse or chronic opioid use
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
St Luke's Roosevelt Hospital Center
New York, New York, 10025, United States
Related Publications (1)
Salviz EA, Xu D, Frulla A, Kwofie K, Shastri U, Chen J, Shariat AN, Littwin S, Lin E, Choi J, Hobeika P, Hadzic A. Continuous interscalene block in patients having outpatient rotator cuff repair surgery: a prospective randomized trial. Anesth Analg. 2013 Dec;117(6):1485-92. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000436607.40643.0a.
PMID: 24257398DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
1\. It was difficult to keep three different groups blinded. 2. The resting and mobilization highest/worst NRS pain scores were ignored and only the highest pain scores of the postoperative days 1, 2, 3, and 7 were recorded.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr.Admir Hadzic
- Organization
- StLukeNY
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Admir Hadzic, MD,PhD,Prof
St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 26, 2013
First Posted
June 20, 2013
Study Start
August 1, 2011
Primary Completion
June 1, 2012
Study Completion
June 1, 2012
Last Updated
June 4, 2014
Results First Posted
June 4, 2014
Record last verified: 2013-07