ShuntCheck-Micro-Pumper Pediatric Clinical Outcomes Study
An Operator-Blinded Study of the Efficacy of ShuntCheck-Micro-Pumper, a Non-Invasive Diagnostic Procedure, in Detecting Ventricular Shunt Patency or Occlusion and in Predicting Clinical Outcome in Children and Adolescents Presenting to Emergency Departments and Neurosurgery Clinics
This date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
Primary Completion
June 2015
Estimated (date passed)
This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
September 2015
Estimated (date passed)
This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Brief Summary
Primary objective is to demonstrate that data collected from ShuntCheck-Micro-Pumper (SCMP) testing results can be used in conjunction with imaging to diagnose shunt patency or obstruction in pediatric/adolescent subjects presenting to an Emergency Department or Neurosurgery Clinic (ED/NC). SCMP results and SCMP results combined with other diagnostic methods, including the Attending Physician's and the Neurosurgeon's clinical judgment will be compared to clinical outcomes within 7 days of ED/NC visit - either shunt obstruction confirmed during shunt revision surgery or shunt patency confirmed by no surgery or patency confirmed in surgery.
Registry Overview
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
Recruitment status
unknown
Estimated enrollment
400 participants
Study completion date
September 2015
Estimated (date passed)
This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Listed locations
1 countries · 11 sites
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Related Scientific Literature
Loading related publications...
Study Timeline
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
Study Start
May 2013
Date type not reported
This date has not been verified as actual or estimated.
First Submitted
June 13, 2013
Actual (reported)
First Posted
June 20, 2013
Actual (reported)
Primary Completion
June 2015
Estimated (date passed)
This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
September 2015
Estimated (date passed)
This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Diagnostic accuracy compared with clinical outcomes
SCMP results and SCMP results combined with other diagnostic methods, including the Attending Physician's and the Neurosurgeon's clinical judgment will be compared to clinical outcomes within 7 days of ED/NC visit - either shunt obstruction confirmed during shunt revision surgery or shunt patency confirmed by no surgery or patency confirmed in surgery.
7 days
Positive Predictive Value (PPV)
Specifically to demonstrate that SCMP positive (Flow Not Confirmed - FNC) plus imaging positive (enlarged ventricles) results yield a higher positive predictive value than imaging positive alone.
7 days
Negative Predictive Value (NPV)
Specifically to demonstrate that SCMP negative (Flow Confirmed - FC) plus imaging negative (non-enlarged ventricles) results yield a higher negative predictive value than imaging negative alone.
7 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Rule Out for Low Risk Cases
7 days
Increased PPV and NPV for Uncertain Cases
7 days
Study Arms (6)
SCMP plus Imaging
EXPERIMENTAL
SCMP plus Imaging will be compared to clinical outcomes within 7 days of ED/NC visit - either shunt obstruction confirmed during shunt revision surgery or shunt patency confirmed by no surgery or patency confirmed in surgery.
Imaging alone will be compared to clinical outcomes within 7 days of ED/NC visit - either shunt obstruction confirmed during shunt revision surgery or shunt patency confirmed by no surgery or patency confirmed in surgery.
Device: Imaging
SCMP Rule Out for Low Risk Cases
EXPERIMENTAL
Interventions
ShuntCheck-Micro-Pumper (SCMP)Device
ShuntCheck uses thermal dilution to detect flow in CSF shunts. CSF is cooled transcutaneously with an ice pack and ShuntCheck's thermosensor detects a temperature drop due to CSF flow "downstream" of the ice. Micro-Pumper is a handheld device which vibrates the shunt valve to generate a temporary increase in CSF flow in patent but temporarily non-flowing shunts. This flow increase can be detected by ShuntCheck.
SCMP Rule Out for Low Risk CasesSCMP plus ImagingSCMP plus Imaging in Uncertain Cases
ImagingDevice
Eligibility Criteria
Age35 Months - 29 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)
You may qualify if:
Males or females, older than 35 months and less than 20 years of age.
Parent/guardian or alert subject (age 18 or over) capable of giving consent; subject less than 18 and of assent age must give assent to participate if appropriate and required by the institution. If the subjects are incapable of giving assent, then only parent/guardian consent is required.
To determine if any adverse events were caused by the device or procedure while using the study device.
1 day
SCMP results in patients judged by the physician to be "Unlikely to require shunt surgery" will be compared to clinical outcomes within 7 days of ED/NC visit - either shunt obstruction confirmed during shunt revision surgery or shunt patency confirmed by no surgery or patency confirmed in surgery - to determine Negative Predictive Value in ruling out shunt malfunction
Device: ShuntCheck-Micro-Pumper (SCMP)
Imaging Rule for Low Risk Cases
ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Imaging results in patients judged by the physician to be "Unlikely to require shunt surgery" will be compared to clinical outcomes within 7 days of ED/NC visit - either shunt obstruction confirmed during shunt revision surgery or shunt patency confirmed by no surgery or patency confirmed in surgery - to determine Negative Predictive Value in ruling out shunt malfunction
Device: Imaging
SCMP plus Imaging in Uncertain Cases
EXPERIMENTAL
SCMP plus imaging results in patients who are admitted for observation results in patients judged by the physician to be "Unlikely to require shunt surgery" will be compared to clinical outcomes within 7 days of ED/NC visit - either shunt obstruction confirmed during shunt revision surgery or shunt patency confirmed by no surgery or patency confirmed in surgery - to determine Positive and Negative Predictive Value
Imaging results in patients who are admitted for observation results in patients judged by the physician to be "Unlikely to require shunt surgery" will be compared to clinical outcomes within 7 days of ED/NC visit - either shunt obstruction confirmed during shunt revision surgery or shunt patency confirmed by no surgery or patency confirmed in surgery - to determine Positive and Negative Predictive Value
Device: Imaging
Imaging of ventricle size
Also known as: CT Scan, MRI
Imaging AloneImaging Rule for Low Risk CasesImaging alone in Uncertain CasesSCMP plus ImagingSCMP plus Imaging in Uncertain Cases
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Possess an unambiguously identifiable chronically indwelling ventricular shunt which crosses the clavicle.
Suspicion of shunt obstruction is great enough to warrant the performance of any diagnostic test for this condition
Will be available for follow-up for up to 7 days
You may not qualify if:
Inability or unwillingness of the parent/guardian or alert subject to give informed consent/assent (when appropriate) as required by the Institutional Review Board.
Presence of multiple shunts or known non-functioning shunts crossing the clavicle.
Evaluating staff rule out shunt obstruction on the basis of a physical/clinical examination.
SCMP test would interfere with emergent subject care or if the subject is scheduled to go the OR in short order.
Presence of an interfering open wound or edema over the shunt.
Likelihood, in the judgment of the investigator, of the subject being lost to follow-up as a result of subject unavailability or clinical outcome being unobtainable.
Any other condition that would preclude or bias the results of the study according to the judgment of the investigator.
Judgment of the investigator that participation in the study will interfere with, or be detrimental to, administration of optimal health-care to the subject.
This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
September 2015
Estimated (date passed)
This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Last Updated
June 23, 2015
Record last verified: 2015-06
Source record
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.