Cost Effectiveness of Nonoperative Management for Adult Spinal Deformity
HEO
1 other identifier
observational
21
1 country
10
Brief Summary
Quantify the efficacy and cost of nonoperative treatment modalities used for adult spinal deformity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jun 2015
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 14, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 18, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2017
CompletedApril 6, 2017
April 1, 2017
1.6 years
June 14, 2013
April 4, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
This questionnaire has been designed to provide information as to how back pain affects ability to manage in everyday life. Score must be equal to or greater than 30 for eligibility to enroll.
Initial visit and six months post enrollment
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Radiographs
Initial visit (Day 1)
Other Outcomes (5)
SRS22r
Initial (Day1) and six months post enrollment
EQ5D-3L
Initial (Day1) and six months post enrollment
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI:SHP)
Initial (Day1) and six months post enrollment
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Nonoperative
Adult spinal deformity (degenerative or idiopathic) with an ODI of 30 or greater
Eligibility Criteria
Adult spinal deformity patients
You may qualify if:
- Age 40-75 years of age at the time of enrollment.
- ODI ≥30
- Adult degenerative or idiopathic lumbar scoliosis 10-40° as measured by the Cobb angle technique
- Sagittal plane deformity by SRS Schwab classification with at least one modifier ++ or two modifiers + and associated coronal cobb of at least 10 degrees
You may not qualify if:
- Adult degenerative or idiopathic scoliosis with a curvature of the spine measuring \<10 degrees or \>40 degrees
- Diagnosis of scoliosis other than degenerative or idiopathic (i.e. neuromuscular, congenital, etc.)
- Cardiopulmonary disease or comorbidities that preclude surgical intervention
- Patient not deemed surgical candidate by treating surgeon
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Shay Besslead
- DePuy Spinecollaborator
- Medtroniccollaborator
Study Sites (10)
University of California - Davis
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
University of California - San Francisco Medical Center
San Francisco, California, 94143, United States
Rocky Mountain Scoliosis and Spine
Denver, Colorado, 80205, United States
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160, United States
Norton Leatherman Spine Center
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States
Washington University at St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases
New York, New York, 10010, United States
Hospital for Special Surgery
New York, New York, 10021, United States
Oregon Health Sciences University
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908, United States
Related Publications (35)
Avorn J. Debate about funding comparative-effectiveness research. N Engl J Med. 2009 May 7;360(19):1927-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0902427. No abstract available.
PMID: 19420361BACKGROUNDBaldus C, Bridwell KH, Harrast J, Edwards C 2nd, Glassman S, Horton W, Lenke LG, Lowe T, Mardjetko S, Ondra S, Schwab F, Shaffrey C. Age-gender matched comparison of SRS instrument scores between adult deformity and normal adults: are all SRS domains disease specific? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Sep 15;33(20):2214-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817c0466.
PMID: 18794764BACKGROUNDBerven S, Deviren V, Demir-Deviren S, Hu SS, Bradford DS. Studies in the modified Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument in adults: validation, reliability, and discriminatory capacity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Sep 15;28(18):2164-9; discussion 2169. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000084666.53553.D6.
PMID: 14501930BACKGROUNDBonham AC, Rich EC, Davis DA, Longnecker DE, Heinig SJ. Commentary: Putting evidence to work: an expanded research agenda for academic medicine in the era of health care reform. Acad Med. 2010 Oct;85(10):1551-3. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181effdbc.
PMID: 20703148BACKGROUNDBridwell KH, Berven S, Glassman S, Hamill C, Horton WC 3rd, Lenke LG, Schwab F, Baldus C, Shainline M. Is the SRS-22 instrument responsive to change in adult scoliosis patients having primary spinal deformity surgery? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Sep 15;32(20):2220-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814cf120.
PMID: 17873814BACKGROUNDBridwell KH, Glassman S, Horton W, Shaffrey C, Schwab F, Zebala LP, Lenke LG, Hilton JF, Shainline M, Baldus C, Wootten D. Does treatment (nonoperative and operative) improve the two-year quality of life in patients with adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis: a prospective multicenter evidence-based medicine study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Sep 15;34(20):2171-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a8fdc8.
PMID: 19752703BACKGROUNDCarter OD, Haynes SG. Prevalence rates for scoliosis in US adults: results from the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Int J Epidemiol. 1987 Dec;16(4):537-44. doi: 10.1093/ije/16.4.537.
PMID: 3501989BACKGROUNDDeyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Goodman DC, Jarvik JG. Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. JAMA. 2010 Apr 7;303(13):1259-65. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.338.
PMID: 20371784BACKGROUNDEverett CR, Patel RK. A systematic literature review of nonsurgical treatment in adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Sep 1;32(19 Suppl):S130-4. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318134ea88.
PMID: 17728680BACKGROUNDGarber AM, Tunis SR. Does comparative-effectiveness research threaten personalized medicine? N Engl J Med. 2009 May 7;360(19):1925-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0901355. No abstract available.
PMID: 19420360BACKGROUNDGarrison KR, Donell S, Ryder J, Shemilt I, Mugford M, Harvey I, Song F. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bone morphogenetic proteins in the non-healing of fractures and spinal fusion: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2007 Aug;11(30):1-150, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta11300.
PMID: 17669279BACKGROUNDGlassman SD, Berven S, Kostuik J, Dimar JR, Horton WC, Bridwell K. Nonsurgical resource utilization in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 15;31(8):941-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000209318.32148.8b.
PMID: 16622386BACKGROUNDGlassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F. The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Sep 15;30(18):2024-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000179086.30449.96.
PMID: 16166889BACKGROUNDGlassman SD, Carreon LY, Shaffrey CI, Polly DW, Ondra SL, Berven SH, Bridwell KH. The costs and benefits of nonoperative management for adult scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Mar 1;35(5):578-82. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b0f2f8.
PMID: 20118843BACKGROUNDGlassman SD, Polly DW, Dimar JR, Carreon LY. The cost effectiveness of single-level instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion at 5 years after surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Apr 20;37(9):769-74. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e03099.
PMID: 20489676BACKGROUNDHirth RA, Bloom BS, Chernew ME, Fendrick AM. Patient, physician, and payer perceptions and misperceptions of willingness to pay for diagnostic certainty. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2000 Winter;16(1):35-49. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300016147.
PMID: 10815352BACKGROUNDHirth RA, Chernew ME, Miller E, Fendrick AM, Weissert WG. Willingness to pay for a quality-adjusted life year: in search of a standard. Med Decis Making. 2000 Jul-Sep;20(3):332-42. doi: 10.1177/0272989X0002000310.
PMID: 10929856BACKGROUNDHogan P, Dall T, Nikolov P; American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2002. Diabetes Care. 2003 Mar;26(3):917-32. doi: 10.2337/diacare.26.3.917.
PMID: 12610059BACKGROUNDLafage V, Schwab F, Patel A, Hawkinson N, Farcy JP. Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 1;34(17):E599-606. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aad219.
PMID: 19644319BACKGROUNDLafage V, Schwab F, Skalli W, Hawkinson N, Gagey PM, Ondra S, Farcy JP. Standing balance and sagittal plane spinal deformity: analysis of spinopelvic and gravity line parameters. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jun 15;33(14):1572-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817886a2.
PMID: 18552673BACKGROUNDLaupacis A, Feeny D, Detsky AS, Tugwell PX. How attractive does a new technology have to be to warrant adoption and utilization? Tentative guidelines for using clinical and economic evaluations. CMAJ. 1992 Feb 15;146(4):473-81.
PMID: 1306034BACKGROUNDLoomes G, McKenzie L. The use of QALYs in health care decision making. Soc Sci Med. 1989;28(4):299-308. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90030-0.
PMID: 2649989BACKGROUNDMartin BI, Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Turner JA, Comstock BA, Hollingworth W, Sullivan SD. Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems. JAMA. 2008 Feb 13;299(6):656-64. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.6.656.
PMID: 18270354BACKGROUNDMcCabe C, Claxton K, Culyer AJ. The NICE cost-effectiveness threshold: what it is and what that means. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(9):733-44. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826090-00004.
PMID: 18767894BACKGROUNDPerennou D, Marcelli C, Herisson C, Simon L. Adult lumbar scoliosis. Epidemiologic aspects in a low-back pain population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Jan 15;19(2):123-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199401001-00001.
PMID: 8153817BACKGROUNDRidyard CH, Hughes DA. Methods for the collection of resource use data within clinical trials: a systematic review of studies funded by the UK Health Technology Assessment program. Value Health. 2010 Dec;13(8):867-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00788.x. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
PMID: 20946187BACKGROUNDRihn JA, Berven S, Allen T, Phillips FM, Currier BL, Glassman SD, Nash DB, Mick C, Crockard A, Albert TJ. Defining value in spine care. Am J Med Qual. 2009 Nov-Dec;24(6 Suppl):4S-14S. doi: 10.1177/1062860609349214.
PMID: 19890180BACKGROUNDRussell LB, Gold MR, Siegel JE, Daniels N, Weinstein MC. The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA. 1996 Oct 9;276(14):1172-7.
PMID: 8827972BACKGROUNDSchwab F, Dubey A, Gamez L, El Fegoun AB, Hwang K, Pagala M, Farcy JP. Adult scoliosis: prevalence, SF-36, and nutritional parameters in an elderly volunteer population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 May 1;30(9):1082-5. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000160842.43482.cd.
PMID: 15864163BACKGROUNDSchwab F, Lafage V, Patel A, Farcy JP. Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 1;34(17):1828-33. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a13c08.
PMID: 19644334BACKGROUNDSmith JS, Shaffrey CI, Berven S, Glassman S, Hamill C, Horton W, Ondra S, Schwab F, Shainline M, Fu KM, Bridwell K; Spinal Deformity Study Group. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of leg pain in adults with scoliosis: a retrospective review of a prospective multicenter database with two-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jul 15;34(16):1693-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ac5fcd.
PMID: 19770610BACKGROUNDTesta MA, Nackley JF. Methods for quality-of-life studies. Annu Rev Public Health. 1994;15:535-59. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.15.050194.002535.
PMID: 8054098BACKGROUNDTorrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ. 1986 Mar;5(1):1-30. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(86)90020-2.
PMID: 10311607BACKGROUNDTosteson AN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, Skinner JS, Herkowitz H, Albert T, Boden SD, Bridwell K, Longley M, Andersson GB, Blood EA, Grove MR, Weinstein JN; SPORT Investigators. Surgical treatment of spinal stenosis with and without degenerative spondylolisthesis: cost-effectiveness after 2 years. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Dec 16;149(12):845-53. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-12-200812160-00003.
PMID: 19075203BACKGROUNDTosteson AN, Skinner JS, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Andersson GB, Berven S, Grove MR, Hanscom B, Blood EA, Weinstein JN. The cost effectiveness of surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation over two years: evidence from the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT). Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Sep 1;33(19):2108-15. doi: 10.1097/brs.0b013e318182e390.
PMID: 18777603BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shay Bess, MD
Rocky Mountain Scoliosis and Spine
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- President, ISSGF
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 14, 2013
First Posted
June 18, 2013
Study Start
June 1, 2015
Primary Completion
January 1, 2017
Study Completion
April 1, 2017
Last Updated
April 6, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share