NCT01879787

Brief Summary

This study aims to evaluate systematically and controlled the effectiveness of mental practice techniques and modified constraint- induced movement therapy (mCIMT)in the treatment of post-stroke patients with motor deficit in the upper limb. As well as finding a protocol of transcranial direct current stimulation(tDCS)that will maximize the effects of the practice of mental image and mCIMT. To this end, the subjects included will be submitted to 12 therapy sessions with active or sham tDCS combined with at least one of the following techniques: conventional physiotherapy, mental practice technique or mCIMT

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
84

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_2 stroke

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2011

Typical duration for phase_2 stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2011

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 10, 2013

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 18, 2013

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2013

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

April 13, 2015

Status Verified

May 1, 2014

Enrollment Period

2.6 years

First QC Date

May 10, 2013

Last Update Submit

April 10, 2015

Conditions

Keywords

Stroketranscranial direct current stimulationconstraint-induced movement therapymental practice

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change from Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity Motor Function

    The Fugl-Meyer assessment was used to measure recovery of motor control. It is a 226-point scoring system that includes range of motion, pain, sensation, motor function of the upper and lower extremities, and balance.This instrument provides a reliable and valid measure of specific motor function that is also sensitive to change.

    At baseline, 1 month and 2 month

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Change from Motor Activity Log

    At baseline, 1 month and 2 month

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Change from Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test

    At baseline, 1 month and 2 months

Study Arms (7)

physiotherapy + anodal tDCS + mCIMT

EXPERIMENTAL

Before a anodal tDCS with duration of 13 minutes and intensity of 1mA applied at the injured motor cortex, the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. Lastly the individual will realized a 45 minutes mCIMT protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions. At home the patient will spend 6 hours per day with the restraint for the paretic upper limb.

Other: tDCS

Physiotherapy + cathodal tDCS + mCIMT

EXPERIMENTAL

Before a cathodal tDCS with duration of 9 minutes and intensity of 1mA applied at the healthy motor cortex, the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. Lastly the individual will realized a 45 minutes mCIMT protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions. At home the patient will spend 6 hours per day with the restraint for the paretic upper limb.

Other: tDCS

Physiotherapy+bi-hemispheric tDCS+mCIMT

EXPERIMENTAL

Before a bi-hemispheric tDCS with duration of 13 minutes and intensity of 1mA applied at the healthy (cathode) and injured (anode) motor cortex, the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. Lastly the individual will realized a 45 minutes mCIMT protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions. At home the patient will spend 6 hours per day with the restraint for the paretic upper limb.

Other: tDCS

Physiotherapy+sham tDCS+mCIMT

SHAM COMPARATOR

Before a sham tDCS with duration of 30 seconds and intensity of 1mA applied at the injured motor cortex, the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. Lastly the individual will realized a 45 minutes mCIMT protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions. At home the patient will spend 6 hours per day with the restraint for the paretic upper limb.

Other: tDCS

Physiotherapy+tDCS+mental practice

EXPERIMENTAL

Before a tDCS protocol applied during de mental practice training , the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions.

Other: tDCS

Physiotherapy+sham tDCS+mental practice

SHAM COMPARATOR

Before a sham tDCS protocol applied during the mental practice training, the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions.

Other: tDCS

Physiotherapy

NO INTERVENTION

The patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions.

Interventions

tDCSOTHER

tDCS involves application of very low-amplitude direct currents(2 mA or less) via surface scalp electrodes.This produces a sub-sensory level of electrical stimulation which remains imperceptible by most people during its application. In a small percentage of patients it may cause minimal discomfort with a mild tingling sensation, which usually disappears after a few seconds. The applied current modifies the transmembrane neuronal potential and thus influences the level of excitability. Depending on the polarity of active electrodes tDCS can increase or decrease corticomotor excitability. Cathodal tDCS decrease and anodal tDCS increase the motor cortex excitability.

Also known as: non invasive brain stimulation
Physiotherapy + cathodal tDCS + mCIMTPhysiotherapy+bi-hemispheric tDCS+mCIMTPhysiotherapy+sham tDCS+mCIMTPhysiotherapy+sham tDCS+mental practicePhysiotherapy+tDCS+mental practicephysiotherapy + anodal tDCS + mCIMT

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • chronic stroke (\> 6 months)
  • score ≥ 20 at the Folstein Mini Mental State Examination
  • score ≤ 3 at the Ashworth Scale
  • score ≤ 4 at the Visual Analog Pain Scale

You may not qualify if:

  • multiple brain lesions
  • medication for treatment of spasticity
  • attention deficit
  • deficit in perceptual ability and motivation to follow the instructions for the mental training
  • pregnant
  • pacemaker
  • metal implant in the region of the skull and face
  • history of convulsion
  • epilepsy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Applied Neuroscience Laboratory

Recife, Pernambuco, 50740-560, Brazil

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Interventions

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsConvulsive TherapyPsychiatric Somatic TherapiesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesElectroshockPsychological Techniques

Study Officials

  • Kátia K Monte Silva, PhD

    Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
PhD in Neuroscience

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2013

First Posted

June 18, 2013

Study Start

January 1, 2011

Primary Completion

August 1, 2013

Study Completion

December 1, 2014

Last Updated

April 13, 2015

Record last verified: 2014-05

Locations