Effects of tDCS Combined With mCIMT or Mental Practice in Poststroke Patients
Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)on the Effects of Mental Practice and Modified Constraint-induced Movement Therapy (mCIMT)in the Rehabilitation of Chronic Stroke Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
84
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate systematically and controlled the effectiveness of mental practice techniques and modified constraint- induced movement therapy (mCIMT)in the treatment of post-stroke patients with motor deficit in the upper limb. As well as finding a protocol of transcranial direct current stimulation(tDCS)that will maximize the effects of the practice of mental image and mCIMT. To this end, the subjects included will be submitted to 12 therapy sessions with active or sham tDCS combined with at least one of the following techniques: conventional physiotherapy, mental practice technique or mCIMT
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2 stroke
Started Jan 2011
Typical duration for phase_2 stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 10, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 18, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2014
CompletedApril 13, 2015
May 1, 2014
2.6 years
May 10, 2013
April 10, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity Motor Function
The Fugl-Meyer assessment was used to measure recovery of motor control. It is a 226-point scoring system that includes range of motion, pain, sensation, motor function of the upper and lower extremities, and balance.This instrument provides a reliable and valid measure of specific motor function that is also sensitive to change.
At baseline, 1 month and 2 month
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change from Motor Activity Log
At baseline, 1 month and 2 month
Other Outcomes (1)
Change from Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test
At baseline, 1 month and 2 months
Study Arms (7)
physiotherapy + anodal tDCS + mCIMT
EXPERIMENTALBefore a anodal tDCS with duration of 13 minutes and intensity of 1mA applied at the injured motor cortex, the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. Lastly the individual will realized a 45 minutes mCIMT protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions. At home the patient will spend 6 hours per day with the restraint for the paretic upper limb.
Physiotherapy + cathodal tDCS + mCIMT
EXPERIMENTALBefore a cathodal tDCS with duration of 9 minutes and intensity of 1mA applied at the healthy motor cortex, the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. Lastly the individual will realized a 45 minutes mCIMT protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions. At home the patient will spend 6 hours per day with the restraint for the paretic upper limb.
Physiotherapy+bi-hemispheric tDCS+mCIMT
EXPERIMENTALBefore a bi-hemispheric tDCS with duration of 13 minutes and intensity of 1mA applied at the healthy (cathode) and injured (anode) motor cortex, the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. Lastly the individual will realized a 45 minutes mCIMT protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions. At home the patient will spend 6 hours per day with the restraint for the paretic upper limb.
Physiotherapy+sham tDCS+mCIMT
SHAM COMPARATORBefore a sham tDCS with duration of 30 seconds and intensity of 1mA applied at the injured motor cortex, the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. Lastly the individual will realized a 45 minutes mCIMT protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions. At home the patient will spend 6 hours per day with the restraint for the paretic upper limb.
Physiotherapy+tDCS+mental practice
EXPERIMENTALBefore a tDCS protocol applied during de mental practice training , the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions.
Physiotherapy+sham tDCS+mental practice
SHAM COMPARATORBefore a sham tDCS protocol applied during the mental practice training, the patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions.
Physiotherapy
NO INTERVENTIONThe patient will be submitted to a 30 minutes physiotherapy protocol. The experimental sessions will be repeated three times per week, will be realized 10 sessions.
Interventions
tDCS involves application of very low-amplitude direct currents(2 mA or less) via surface scalp electrodes.This produces a sub-sensory level of electrical stimulation which remains imperceptible by most people during its application. In a small percentage of patients it may cause minimal discomfort with a mild tingling sensation, which usually disappears after a few seconds. The applied current modifies the transmembrane neuronal potential and thus influences the level of excitability. Depending on the polarity of active electrodes tDCS can increase or decrease corticomotor excitability. Cathodal tDCS decrease and anodal tDCS increase the motor cortex excitability.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- chronic stroke (\> 6 months)
- score ≥ 20 at the Folstein Mini Mental State Examination
- score ≤ 3 at the Ashworth Scale
- score ≤ 4 at the Visual Analog Pain Scale
You may not qualify if:
- multiple brain lesions
- medication for treatment of spasticity
- attention deficit
- deficit in perceptual ability and motivation to follow the instructions for the mental training
- pregnant
- pacemaker
- metal implant in the region of the skull and face
- history of convulsion
- epilepsy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Applied Neuroscience Laboratory
Recife, Pernambuco, 50740-560, Brazil
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Kátia K Monte Silva, PhD
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD in Neuroscience
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 10, 2013
First Posted
June 18, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2011
Primary Completion
August 1, 2013
Study Completion
December 1, 2014
Last Updated
April 13, 2015
Record last verified: 2014-05