T1Rho MRI Evaluation of Patellofemoral Changes After Tibial IM Nailing
Patella Femoral Changes Following Tibial Nailing: Does Approach Matter?
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will utilize T1-Rho MRI to evaluate the effect of intramedullary nailing on patellofemoral articular cartilage when the surgery is performed using the infrapatellar vs. the suprapatellar approach. Subjects will be randomized to one or the other standard care surgical approaches.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 12, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 17, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2020
CompletedJuly 22, 2020
July 1, 2020
6.8 years
June 12, 2013
July 21, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
T1Rho MRI to quantify patellofemoral cartilage changes after IM nailing of the tibia as a primary treatment for acute tibial fractures.
The difference in proteoglycan content of patellofemoral articular cartilage as quantified using spin lattice relaxation in a rotating frame (T1ρ MRI weighted image) at 6 months post-hospital discharge between two groups randomized to undergo either a suprapatellar or infrapatellar approach to tibial IM nailing.
Up to 6 months post-discharge
Secondary Outcomes (2)
SF-36
Pre-op, 2 week scan, 6 months post discharge
SMFA
Pre-op, 2 week scan, 6 months post discharge
Study Arms (2)
Suprapatellar Approach
ACTIVE COMPARATORSuprapatellar Approach to Intramedullary Nailing. Surgeons will be allowed to use any size intramedullary tibial nail through an suprapatellar incision and splitting the quadriceps tendon.
Infrapatellar Approach
ACTIVE COMPARATORInfrapatellar Approach Intramedullary Nailing. Surgeons will be allowed to use any size intramedullary tibial nail through an infrapatellar incision using either a medial parapatellar approach or a transpatellar approach. The knee will then be scanned using T1Rho MRI at 2 weeks postoperatively and 6 months postoperatively.
Interventions
Standard care surgery
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Isolated tibial shaft fractures indicated for intramedullary nailing,
- Acute tibia fractures,
- Closed or open tibia fractures,
- Skeletally mature patient between the ages of 21 and 50,
- No prior history of knee surgery,
- No prior history of knee pain,
- No history of degenerative joint disease or inflammatory arthropathy
- Not pregnant or known to be under the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections
- Able to provide informed consent.
- Qualifies for standard care tibial IM nailing using either a suprapatellar or infrapatellar approach with no physician preference or definitive clinical indication for one or the other approach
- Ability to communicate, read, and write in English
- Intent of subject to receive follow up fracture care at the PI's institution.
You may not qualify if:
- Tibial fractures requiring articular reconstruction (tibial plateau fractures and pilon fractures),
- Periprosthetic fractures,
- Nonunions or malunions,
- History of previous knee surgery,
- History of preexisting knee pain,
- History of degenerative arthritis or inflammatory arthropathy, any evidence of degenerative changes of pre-operative knee radiographs, and any concomitant injury to that limb.
- Any contraindication to MRI imaging
- Retained stainless steel hardware proximal to the knee joint including, but not limited to prior knee replacement.
- Under age 18 at the time of presentation, pregnant or planning to become pregnant within the study period, or under the jurisdiction of the Department of Corrections.
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Participation in any other medical device or medicinal product study within the previous month that could influence the results of the present study
- Insurance or other circumstantial restriction that would prohibit or interfere with the subject's ability to receive follow up care at the PI's institution.
- Any condition, acute or chronic, that in the opinion of the attending physician or the Principal Investigator, would contraindicate participation in this study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Pennsylvanialead
- Synthes USA HQ, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Samir Mehta, MD
University of Pennsylvania
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Derek Donegan, MD
University of Pennsylvania
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Annamarie Horan, PhD
University of Pennsylvania
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 12, 2013
First Posted
June 17, 2013
Study Start
June 1, 2013
Primary Completion
March 1, 2020
Study Completion
July 1, 2020
Last Updated
July 22, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-07