Can Ultrasound Predict Labor Outcome in Operative Vaginal Deliveries?
2 other identifiers
observational
223
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To assess whether ultrasound methods can predict outcome of operative vaginal deliveries in nulliparous women at term with singleton pregnancies and prolonged second stage of labor. To compare different ultrasound assessments Compare digital assessments and ultrasound findings. Investigate if movement of the fetal head during active pushing is a predictive factor Null hypotheses:
- Ultrasound measurements cannot predict outcomes of operative vaginal delivery.
- Ultrasound is not better than digital examination in predicting delivery outcome.
- Movement of fetal head with active pushing is not a predictive factor.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Nov 2013
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 9, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 17, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2016
CompletedOctober 28, 2016
October 1, 2016
2.7 years
June 9, 2013
October 26, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time from start of vacuum assisted traction to delivery
The duration of a vacuum extraction will be measured. Therefore, the time frame is for this variable is only the second stage of labor. However, the time frame including all variables will be from the start of active second stage of labor - 1 hour after delivery.
Active second stage of labor to1 hour after delivery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Successful/failed vaginal operative delivery (vaginal delivery vs. cesarean section
Active second stage of labour
Other Outcomes (3)
Apgar score
first ten minutes after delivery
ph and base excess in umibical cord
first 5 minutes after delivery
birth weight and head circumference
First hour after delivery
Study Arms (1)
Women in active second stage of labour
Ultrasound examinations
Eligibility Criteria
Nulliparous women with a singleton live fetus in cephalic presentation at term (≥ 37 weeks) with prolonged active second stage and a clinical decision to expedite delivery by vacuum due to poor progression
You may qualify if:
- prolonged second stage of labour
You may not qualify if:
- Suspected asphyxia before the start of vacuum extraction
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Helse Stavanger HFlead
- St.Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Norwaycollaborator
- Lund University Hospitalcollaborator
- University of Bolognacollaborator
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovrecollaborator
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospitalcollaborator
- University of Parmacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Stavanger University Hospital
Stavanger, 4313, Norway
Related Publications (14)
Hassan WA, Eggebo TM, Ferguson M, Lees C. Simple two-dimensional ultrasound technique to assess intrapartum cervical dilatation: a pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;41(4):413-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.12316.
PMID: 23024020BACKGROUNDTutschek B, Torkildsen EA, Eggebo TM. Comparison between ultrasound parameters and clinical examination to assess fetal head station in labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;41(4):425-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.12422. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
PMID: 23371409BACKGROUNDTorkildsen EA, Salvesen KA, VON Brandis P, Eggebo TM. Predictive value of ultrasound assessed fetal head position in primiparous women with prolonged first stage of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 Nov;91(11):1300-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01503.x. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
PMID: 22774859BACKGROUNDTorkildsen EA, Salvesen KA, Eggebo TM. Agreement between two- and three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound methods in assessing fetal head descent in the first stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;39(3):310-5. doi: 10.1002/uog.9065.
PMID: 21630362BACKGROUNDTorkildsen EA, Salvesen KA, Eggebo TM. Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jun;37(6):702-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.8951. Epub 2011 May 3.
PMID: 21308837BACKGROUNDEggebo TM, Okland I, Heien C, Gjessing LK, Romundstad P, Salvesen KA. Can ultrasound measurements replace digitally assessed elements of the Bishop score? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(3):325-31. doi: 10.1080/00016340902730417.
PMID: 19172418BACKGROUNDEggebo TM, Heien C, Okland I, Gjessing LK, Romundstad P, Salvesen KA. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Aug;32(2):199-204. doi: 10.1002/uog.5360.
PMID: 18528923BACKGROUNDHenrich W, Dudenhausen J, Fuchs I, Kamena A, Tutschek B. Intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Nov;28(6):753-60. doi: 10.1002/uog.3848.
PMID: 17063455BACKGROUNDKalache KD, Duckelmann AM, Michaelis SA, Lange J, Cichon G, Dudenhausen JW. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the 'angle of progression' predict the mode of delivery? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;33(3):326-30. doi: 10.1002/uog.6294.
PMID: 19224527BACKGROUNDBarbera AF, Pombar X, Perugino G, Lezotte DC, Hobbins JC. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;33(3):313-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.6329.
PMID: 19248000BACKGROUNDEggebo TM. Ultrasound is the future diagnostic tool in active labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;41(4):361-3. doi: 10.1002/uog.12417. No abstract available.
PMID: 23641509BACKGROUNDGhi T, Farina A, Pedrazzi A, Rizzo N, Pelusi G, Pilu G. Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;33(3):331-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.6313.
PMID: 19202576BACKGROUNDGhi T, Youssef A, Maroni E, Arcangeli T, De Musso F, Bellussi F, Nanni M, Giorgetta F, Morselli-Labate AM, Iammarino MT, Paccapelo A, Cariello L, Rizzo N, Pilu G. Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal head progression in active second stage of labor and mode of delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;41(4):430-5. doi: 10.1002/uog.12379.
PMID: 23288706BACKGROUNDYoussef A, Maroni E, Ragusa A, De Musso F, Salsi G, Iammarino MT, Paccapelo A, Rizzo N, Pilu G, Ghi T. Fetal head-symphysis distance: a simple and reliable ultrasound index of fetal head station in labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;41(4):419-24. doi: 10.1002/uog.12335. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
PMID: 23124698BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Torbjørn M Eggebø, phd
Helse Stavanger HF
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 9, 2013
First Posted
June 17, 2013
Study Start
November 1, 2013
Primary Completion
July 1, 2016
Study Completion
July 1, 2016
Last Updated
October 28, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share