NCT01878591

Brief Summary

To assess whether ultrasound methods can predict outcome of operative vaginal deliveries in nulliparous women at term with singleton pregnancies and prolonged second stage of labor. To compare different ultrasound assessments Compare digital assessments and ultrasound findings. Investigate if movement of the fetal head during active pushing is a predictive factor Null hypotheses:

  • Ultrasound measurements cannot predict outcomes of operative vaginal delivery.
  • Ultrasound is not better than digital examination in predicting delivery outcome.
  • Movement of fetal head with active pushing is not a predictive factor.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
223

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2013

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 9, 2013

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 17, 2013

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2013

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

October 28, 2016

Status Verified

October 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

June 9, 2013

Last Update Submit

October 26, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

labourdystociaoperative deliveryvacuumultrasound

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Time from start of vacuum assisted traction to delivery

    The duration of a vacuum extraction will be measured. Therefore, the time frame is for this variable is only the second stage of labor. However, the time frame including all variables will be from the start of active second stage of labor - 1 hour after delivery.

    Active second stage of labor to1 hour after delivery

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Successful/failed vaginal operative delivery (vaginal delivery vs. cesarean section

    Active second stage of labour

Other Outcomes (3)

  • Apgar score

    first ten minutes after delivery

  • ph and base excess in umibical cord

    first 5 minutes after delivery

  • birth weight and head circumference

    First hour after delivery

Study Arms (1)

Women in active second stage of labour

Ultrasound examinations

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years - 45 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Nulliparous women with a singleton live fetus in cephalic presentation at term (≥ 37 weeks) with prolonged active second stage and a clinical decision to expedite delivery by vacuum due to poor progression

You may qualify if:

  • prolonged second stage of labour

You may not qualify if:

  • Suspected asphyxia before the start of vacuum extraction

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Stavanger University Hospital

Stavanger, 4313, Norway

Location

Related Publications (14)

  • Hassan WA, Eggebo TM, Ferguson M, Lees C. Simple two-dimensional ultrasound technique to assess intrapartum cervical dilatation: a pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;41(4):413-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.12316.

    PMID: 23024020BACKGROUND
  • Tutschek B, Torkildsen EA, Eggebo TM. Comparison between ultrasound parameters and clinical examination to assess fetal head station in labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;41(4):425-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.12422. Epub 2013 Mar 14.

    PMID: 23371409BACKGROUND
  • Torkildsen EA, Salvesen KA, VON Brandis P, Eggebo TM. Predictive value of ultrasound assessed fetal head position in primiparous women with prolonged first stage of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 Nov;91(11):1300-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01503.x. Epub 2012 Aug 22.

    PMID: 22774859BACKGROUND
  • Torkildsen EA, Salvesen KA, Eggebo TM. Agreement between two- and three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound methods in assessing fetal head descent in the first stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;39(3):310-5. doi: 10.1002/uog.9065.

    PMID: 21630362BACKGROUND
  • Torkildsen EA, Salvesen KA, Eggebo TM. Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jun;37(6):702-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.8951. Epub 2011 May 3.

    PMID: 21308837BACKGROUND
  • Eggebo TM, Okland I, Heien C, Gjessing LK, Romundstad P, Salvesen KA. Can ultrasound measurements replace digitally assessed elements of the Bishop score? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(3):325-31. doi: 10.1080/00016340902730417.

    PMID: 19172418BACKGROUND
  • Eggebo TM, Heien C, Okland I, Gjessing LK, Romundstad P, Salvesen KA. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Aug;32(2):199-204. doi: 10.1002/uog.5360.

    PMID: 18528923BACKGROUND
  • Henrich W, Dudenhausen J, Fuchs I, Kamena A, Tutschek B. Intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Nov;28(6):753-60. doi: 10.1002/uog.3848.

    PMID: 17063455BACKGROUND
  • Kalache KD, Duckelmann AM, Michaelis SA, Lange J, Cichon G, Dudenhausen JW. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the 'angle of progression' predict the mode of delivery? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;33(3):326-30. doi: 10.1002/uog.6294.

    PMID: 19224527BACKGROUND
  • Barbera AF, Pombar X, Perugino G, Lezotte DC, Hobbins JC. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;33(3):313-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.6329.

    PMID: 19248000BACKGROUND
  • Eggebo TM. Ultrasound is the future diagnostic tool in active labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;41(4):361-3. doi: 10.1002/uog.12417. No abstract available.

    PMID: 23641509BACKGROUND
  • Ghi T, Farina A, Pedrazzi A, Rizzo N, Pelusi G, Pilu G. Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;33(3):331-6. doi: 10.1002/uog.6313.

    PMID: 19202576BACKGROUND
  • Ghi T, Youssef A, Maroni E, Arcangeli T, De Musso F, Bellussi F, Nanni M, Giorgetta F, Morselli-Labate AM, Iammarino MT, Paccapelo A, Cariello L, Rizzo N, Pilu G. Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal head progression in active second stage of labor and mode of delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;41(4):430-5. doi: 10.1002/uog.12379.

    PMID: 23288706BACKGROUND
  • Youssef A, Maroni E, Ragusa A, De Musso F, Salsi G, Iammarino MT, Paccapelo A, Rizzo N, Pilu G, Ghi T. Fetal head-symphysis distance: a simple and reliable ultrasound index of fetal head station in labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;41(4):419-24. doi: 10.1002/uog.12335. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

    PMID: 23124698BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dystocia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Obstetric Labor ComplicationsPregnancy ComplicationsFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Torbjørn M Eggebø, phd

    Helse Stavanger HF

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 9, 2013

First Posted

June 17, 2013

Study Start

November 1, 2013

Primary Completion

July 1, 2016

Study Completion

July 1, 2016

Last Updated

October 28, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations