Differences in Music Perception Skills Between Child, Teen and Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients
1 other identifier
observational
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Adult recipients of cochlear implants (CI) generally loose interest in listening to music. This may be due to the rather limited spectral resolution of CI. However, child CI-recipients, if offered the opportunity, like to listen to music. They participate actively in musical acitivities, such as singing, dancing or playing an instrument. Thus, there seems to be a fundamental difference in the music perception of people who receive CI as child or as adult. This study assesses music perception skills of child, teen and adult cochlear implant recipients in settings with simple tone sequences and in a more complex, melodious context.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Nov 2011
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 10, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 12, 2013
CompletedJune 12, 2013
May 1, 2013
8 months
June 10, 2013
June 10, 2013
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Does the age at which a person receives a cochlear implant influence music perception skills?
The test assesses wether cochlear implant carriers are able to hear the difference betweent two sequences of sounds, where in the second sequence on tone is different from the first sequence. If a difference is perceived, then the test assesses how big this difference has to be in order to be heard. The first and the second test are no more than six months apart; both times the same procedure is followed. The test is carried out with three age groups: 1. Children aged 3-10 years 2. Teenagers aged 11 - 14 years 3. Persons above 15 years
Test and retest are taken within 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Do the results of the primary outcome measure depend on the tone sequence presented to the cochlear implant recipients?
Test and retest are no more than 6 months apart
Other Outcomes (1)
How can the findings of the primary and the secondary outcome measure be used to improve music perception with existing cochlear implants?
6 months
Study Arms (3)
Children aged 3 - 10 years
Assessment of music perception skills with cochlear implant recipients aged 3 - 10 years
Teenagers aged 11 - 15 years
Assessment of music perception skills with cochlear implant recipients aged 11 - 15 years
Adults aged 16 - 70 years
Assessment of music perception skills with cochlear implant recipients aged 16 - 70 years
Interventions
A sequence of tones is presented to participants. Then the same sequence is presented again, with the 4th tone being one to six half tones different from the first sequence. Participants are asked to indicate when they hear a difference betweent the first and the second sequence.
Eligibility Criteria
Healthy CI recipients that receive their regular follow-ups in the ENT-clinic of the Zurich University Hospital.
You may qualify if:
- Participants are uni- or bilateral CI recipients.
- Participants are at least 3 years old.
- Participants received CI one or more years before.
- Participants are healthy.
- Participation in the study is voluntary.
- Participants and their legal custodians have read the information for participants at least one day prior to the test and given their written consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Surgery for CI carried out less than one year before the test.
- Children less than 3 years old.
- Reduced cognitive capabilities due to old age.
- Physical or mental handicaps.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital Zurich,
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, 8091, Switzerland
Related Publications (15)
Svirsky MA, Robbins AM, Kirk KI, Pisoni DB, Miyamoto RT. Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants. Psychol Sci. 2000 Mar;11(2):153-8. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00231.
PMID: 11273423BACKGROUNDNicholas JG, Geers AE. Effects of early auditory experience on the spoken language of deaf children at 3 years of age. Ear Hear. 2006 Jun;27(3):286-98. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000215973.76912.c6.
PMID: 16672797BACKGROUNDSvirsky MA, Teoh SW, Neuburger H. Development of language and speech perception in congenitally, profoundly deaf children as a function of age at cochlear implantation. Audiol Neurootol. 2004 Jul-Aug;9(4):224-33. doi: 10.1159/000078392.
PMID: 15205550BACKGROUNDFujita S, Ito J. Ability of nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999 Jul;108(7 Pt 1):634-40. doi: 10.1177/000348949910800702.
PMID: 10435919BACKGROUNDGreen T, Faulkner A, Rosen S. Spectral and temporal cues to pitch in noise-excited vocoder simulations of continuous-interleaved-sampling cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002 Nov;112(5 Pt 1):2155-64. doi: 10.1121/1.1506688.
PMID: 12430827BACKGROUNDPeretz I, Hyde KL. What is specific to music processing? Insights from congenital amusia. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Aug;7(8):362-367. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00150-5.
PMID: 12907232BACKGROUNDFitzsimons M, Sheahan N, Staunton H. Gender and the integration of acoustic dimensions of prosody: implications for clinical studies. Brain Lang. 2001 Jul;78(1):94-108. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2448.
PMID: 11412018BACKGROUNDShannon RV, Zeng FG, Kamath V, Wygonski J, Ekelid M. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science. 1995 Oct 13;270(5234):303-4. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5234.303.
PMID: 7569981BACKGROUNDK. Gfeller, S. A. Witt, L. J. Spencer, J. Stordahl and B. Tomblin (1999), Musical Involvement and Enjoyment of Children Who Use Cochlear Implants, Volta Review, 100(4), pp. 213-233
BACKGROUNDMitani C, Nakata T, Trehub SE, Kanda Y, Kumagami H, Takasaki K, Miyamoto I, Takahashi H. Music recognition, music listening, and word recognition by deaf children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2007 Apr;28(2 Suppl):29S-33S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318031547a.
PMID: 17496641BACKGROUNDCooper WB, Tobey E, Loizou PC. Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia. Ear Hear. 2008 Aug;29(4):618-26. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318174e787.
PMID: 18469714BACKGROUNDSharma A, Dorman MF, Kral A. The influence of a sensitive period on central auditory development in children with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants. Hear Res. 2005 May;203(1-2):134-43. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.12.010.
PMID: 15855038BACKGROUNDLooi V, She J. Music perception of cochlear implant users: a questionnaire, and its implications for a music training program. Int J Audiol. 2010 Feb;49(2):116-28. doi: 10.3109/14992020903405987.
PMID: 20151886BACKGROUNDGfeller K, Turner C, Mehr M, Woodworth G, Fearn R, Knutson JF, Witt S, Stordahl J. Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Cochlear Implants Int. 2002 Mar;3(1):29-53. doi: 10.1179/cim.2002.3.1.29.
PMID: 18792110BACKGROUNDTrehub SE, Cohen AJ, Thorpe LA, Morrongiello BA. Development of the perception of musical relations: semitone and diatonic structure. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1986 Aug;12(3):295-301. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.12.3.295.
PMID: 2943857BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dorothe Veraguth, MD
University Hospital Zurich, Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 10, 2013
First Posted
June 12, 2013
Study Start
November 1, 2011
Primary Completion
July 1, 2012
Study Completion
July 1, 2012
Last Updated
June 12, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-05