Effectiveness of an Intervention for Prevention and Treatment of Burnout in Primary Care
EDESPROAP
1 other identifier
interventional
300
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Burnout syndrome is an important health problem that affects many professionals and must be addressed globally, with both organizational measures and personal interventions. Burnout of health professionals can be prevented in order to avoid personal, familial, and social consequences, as well as repercussions for patients. Methods/Design: This work describes a protocol for a controlled, pragmatic, randomized clinical trial in 2 parallel groups: intervention and control. All health professionals from 7 health care centers (HCCs) will form the intervention group, and all health professionals from 7 different HCCs will form the control group. The intervention group will receive 16 hours of training at their work place. The Maslach's burnout inventory (MBI), burnout physician Questionnaire (CDPM) or burnout nurse Questionnaire (CDPE), and the 28-item Goldberg's General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28), validated for our setting, will be used as measurement tools. Change in the average scores from the MBI emotional exhaustion scale will be compared between the intervention and control groups, measured as intention-to-treat, and the intervention will be considered effective if a minimum increase of 20% is achieved. Discussion: Due to the deleterious consequences of burnout syndrome for people suffering from it and for the organization where they work, it is necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of certain interventions for its prevention. Organizational measures are important for preventing burnout syndrome, but so is providing professionals with coping strategies, as this group intervention intends to do.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2010
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 2, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 5, 2013
CompletedJune 5, 2013
June 1, 2013
3 years
June 2, 2013
June 4, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Maslach's burnout inventory (MBI)
Worker classification regarding burnout syndrome will be performed according to the MBI, which includes 22 items to evaluate emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization (DP), and personal fulfillment (PF), with scores ranging from 0 to 6 on the Likert scale. We consider a high degree of burnout in the case of EE ≥ 27 points, DP ≥ 10, and PF \<33. Moderate burnout will be considered in the case of 26\<EE\<19 points, 6\<DP\<9 points, and 34\<PF\<39 points. Low levels will be considered for EE≤18 points, DP≤5 points, and PF≥40 points.
One year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Goldberg's General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28)
One year
Study Arms (2)
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention consists of 16 hours of training, to be held at the subject's health center. The workshop involves mixed learning, comprising 4 sessions, each 2 hours long, in addition to personal work previous to and after each session of reading relevant bibliography and performing exercises, self-evaluation, and case studies (8 hours of individual work).
Control group
ACTIVE COMPARATORUsual care
Interventions
The objective of the intervention is learning from the work experience of professionals attending the workshop to know and recognize the risk and process of the burnout syndrome and the characteristics specific to the health setting, as well as promoting prevention lines by transmitting strategies to manage and control the elements and consequences of the syndrome process (physical, psychological, and social).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All health professionals (family physicians, pediatricians, and nurses) who are part of the health care centers at the moment of the trial.
You may not qualify if:
- No one.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Gerencia de Atención Primaria
Madrid, Madrid, 28003, Spain
Related Publications (1)
Gomez-Gascon T, Martin-Fernandez J, Galvez-Herrer M, Tapias-Merino E, Beamud-Lagos M, Mingote-Adan JC; Grupo EDESPROAP-Madrid. Effectiveness of an intervention for prevention and treatment of burnout in primary health care professionals. BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Nov 17;14:173. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-173.
PMID: 24237937DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tomás Gómez-Gascón, MD
Gerencia de Atención Primaria, Madrid
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 2, 2013
First Posted
June 5, 2013
Study Start
March 1, 2010
Primary Completion
March 1, 2013
Study Completion
March 1, 2013
Last Updated
June 5, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-06