NCT01868789

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the average joint motion and joint axis orientation of the hindfoot bones between patients diagnosed with adult-acquired flatfoot disorder (AAFD) and a control group of patients without foot deformity, using weight-bearing CT technology.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
23

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2013

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2013

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 24, 2013

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

June 5, 2013

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2013

Completed
4.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 18, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

March 1, 2018

Status Verified

January 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

May 24, 2013

Results QC Date

November 3, 2017

Last Update Submit

January 31, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

Adult-acquired flatfoot disorder (AAFD)flexible flatfootcomputed tomography (CT)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in Joint Motion Between Touch-down Bearing Navicular and Full-weight Bearing Navicular

    Relative motion, which is the position of the full weightbearing (FWB, greater that 75-100% body weight) navicular in comparison to the touch down weightbearing (TDWB, 25-50% body weight) navicular position, will be determined by comparing the joint orientation across these two points on one CT scan. The difference between the two positions is reported below.

    1 CT scan, one reading while touch-down bearing, one reading while full-weight bearing

  • Change in Navicular Rotation Between Touch-down Bearing and Full-weight Bearing

    Relative motion across joint segments will be determined by comparing the joint orientation across two time points: touch-down bearing (TDWB, 25-50% body weight) and full-weight bearing (FWB, greater that 75-100% body weight) as measured on CT.

    1 CT scan, one reading while touch-down bearing, one reading while full-weight bearing

Study Arms (2)

Weightbearing CT (AAFD group)

EXPERIMENTAL

Weightbearing CT scan of affected foot

Radiation: Weightbearing CT

Weightbearing CT (control group)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Weightbearing CT scan of normal foot

Radiation: Weightbearing CT

Interventions

Weightbearing CT (AAFD group)Weightbearing CT (control group)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \. adult patients (ages 18 -80 years old) diagnosed with Stage 2 AAFD

You may not qualify if:

  • previous surgery
  • infection
  • tumor in the affected foot
  • pregnancy
  • Control group:
  • \. adult patients (ages 18 -80 years old) without foot deformity
  • history of previous foot and ankle surgery
  • foot deformity
  • known foot and ankle pathology
  • pregnancy

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Center

Westerville, Ohio, 43082, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Flatfoot

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

TalipesFoot Deformities, AcquiredFoot DeformitiesMusculoskeletal DiseasesFoot Deformities, CongenitalLower Extremity Deformities, CongenitalLimb Deformities, CongenitalMusculoskeletal AbnormalitiesCongenital AbnormalitiesCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities

Limitations and Caveats

Any movement during the scanning process or metal implants caused difficulty with reconstructing the positioning of the bones, therefore those subjects were eliminated from analysis.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Gregory Berlet
Organization
Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Center

Study Officials

  • Gregory C Berlet, MD

    Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2013

First Posted

June 5, 2013

Study Start

May 1, 2013

Primary Completion

November 1, 2013

Study Completion

November 1, 2013

Last Updated

March 1, 2018

Results First Posted

January 18, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-01

Locations