Study Stopped
The duration of the study is longer than 5 years and we can not recruit the participants to the target number.
Low-dose VS High-dose IV Cyclophosphamide for Proliferative LN in Children
Low/highIVCY
Efficacy and Infectious Complications of Induction Therapy With Low-dose Versus High-dose Intravenous Cyclophosphamide for Proliferative Lupus Nephritis in Children
1 other identifier
interventional
43
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Proliferative lupus nephritis (LN)is the predominant cause of morbidity and mortality in juvenile Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). Induction therapy with high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide can improve renal outcomes, but considerably associated with infection. Although severe infection is the significant complication related to poorer prognosis for juvenile SLE patients in Asia, cyclophosphamide is still commonly used as the drug of choice for severe lupus nephritis. Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial demonstrated low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide regimen followed by azathioprine achieved good clinical results comparable with obtained high-dose regimen. There was lower number of severe infection episodes, but no significant difference. Recent studies applied low dose of cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2/dose or 500 mg/dose)in young patients and showed good renal response. Low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide regimen might promote non-inferior renal remission whereas decrease risk of serious infection and improve overall patient outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started May 2013
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 19, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 23, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2019
CompletedSeptember 4, 2020
September 1, 2020
6 years
May 19, 2013
September 2, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
renal response
3 main renal parameters: renal function(eCCl),proteinuria(spot urine protein/creatinine ratio, UPCR), and urine sediment (rbc,wbc,and casts) 'renal remission' * complete- normal renal function, UPCR\<0.2, and normal urine sediment(rbc\<5,wbc\<5/HPF,and no cast) * partial- at least 50%improvement in 2 main parameters with UPCR \<= 1.0 and without worsening of remaining main parameter
at 6 months of the treatment
Secondary Outcomes (1)
infection
within 6 months
Other Outcomes (2)
Patient well being
at 0,1,3 and 6 months of the treatment
SLE disease activity index score
at 0,1,3 and 6 months of the treatment
Study Arms (2)
Low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide
EXPERIMENTALLow-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2/dose every 4 weeks/months for 7 doses. Total duration is 6 months for the induction treatment.
High-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide
ACTIVE COMPARATORHigh-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m2/dose, the first dose will be started with 500 mg/m2/dose and steped up to 750 mg/m2/dose for the second dose. Then the dosage will be increased to 1,000 mg/m2/dose for the third dose and continued the dosage through the seventh dose. Total duration is 6 months for the induction treatment.
Interventions
Intravenous cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2/dose every 4 weeks/months, total 7 doses
Intravenous cyclophosphamide every 4 weeks/months, total in 7 doses: the 1st dose-500 mg/m2/dose,the 2nd dose-750 mg/m2/dose, the 3rd-7th doses- 1,000 mg/m2/dose with the maximum dose at 1,500 mg/dose
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Child up to 15 years of age who fulfilled the 1997 updating the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria for the classification of SLE and his or her renal biopsy reveals lupus nephritis class III or IV regarding to International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society revision on the classification of the lupus nephritis.
You may not qualify if:
- patient who has prior renal insufficiency due to chronic kidney disease other than lupus nephritis
- patient who has the history of cyclophosphamide hypersensitivity
- patient who has prior cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate mofetil administration within 6 months
- patient who is pregnant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Nephrology division, Department of Pediatrics, Siriraj Hospital
Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nuntawan Piyaphanee, MD
Siriraj Hospital
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Anirut Pattaragarn, MD
Siriraj Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 19, 2013
First Posted
May 23, 2013
Study Start
May 1, 2013
Primary Completion
May 1, 2019
Study Completion
May 1, 2019
Last Updated
September 4, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-09