NCT01860235

Brief Summary

Injectable anesthesics previous to subgingival scaling and root planing (SRP) presents some disadvantages like fear of the needle insertion, long-lasting effect and prolonged dampening of adjacent tissues. This study will compare the intrapocket anesthetic effectiveness of a skin topical anesthesic EMLA with intrapocket 2% benzocaine, intrapocket placebo and injectable anaesthesia for SRP in a Split-mouth, double-blind, clinical trial study.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
32

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2010

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2010

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2012

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 8, 2013

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 22, 2013

Completed
Last Updated

May 22, 2013

Status Verified

May 1, 2013

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

May 8, 2013

Last Update Submit

May 18, 2013

Conditions

Keywords

Local anesthesiaPain measurementPain perceptionDental anesthesiaRoot planing

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain and discomfort

    For each experimental tooth, the patient was asked to indicate the intensity of pain and discomfort experienced intraoperatively using the VAS (VAStrans) (5 minutes after the start of the instrumentation in each tooth) and postoperatively (VASpost) immediately after the end of instrumentation of the respective tooth. At the end of the procedure, the patient was asked to also describe the pain sensation of the tooth using VS as: no pain (0), mild pain (1), moderate pain (2), severe pain (3), or extremely severe pain (4).

    For each tooth was evaluated intraoperative pain using the Visual Analog Scale (5 minutes after the start of the instrumentation) and postoperative immediately after instrumentation. At the end of the procedure, was asked Verbal Scale, for 4 weeks.

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Patient satisfaction with anesthesia

    Determined at the end of all treatment sessions, for 4 weeks.

  • Injectable anesthetic requirement

    If pain persisted after this second application, then an anesthesia infiltration/block was performed, for 4 weeks.

  • Adverse Events

    Determined when each patient returned for the next treatment session, for 4 weeks.

Study Arms (4)

sextant 1

EXPERIMENTAL

Treatment with subgingival scaling and root planing was done in 6 weekly sessions, being the sextant 1 in the randomization for experimental procedures (EMLA)

Drug: EMLA

sextant 2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Treatment with subgingival scaling and root planing was done in 6 weekly sessions, being the sextant 1 in the randomization for experimental procedures (Injectable anesthesia)

Drug: Injectable anesthesia

sextant 3

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Treatment with subgingival scaling and root planing was done in 6 weekly sessions, being the sextant 1 in the randomization for experimental procedures (2% Benzocaine)

Drug: 2% Benzocaine

sextant 4

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Treatment with subgingival scaling and root planing was done in 6 weekly sessions, being the sextant 1 in the randomization for experimental procedures (Placebo)

Drug: Placebo

Interventions

EMLADRUG

% eutectic mixture of 25mg/g lidocaine and 25 mg/g of prilocaine

Also known as: EMLA®, AstraZeneca, Cotia, SP, Brazil
sextant 1

Injectable anesthesia 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100.000

Also known as: Alphacaine®, DFL, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
sextant 2

Topical anesthetic - 200mg/g of 2% benzocaine

Also known as: Benzotop ®, DFL, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
sextant 3

Manipulated with the same appearance and viscosity of topical anesthetics mentioned above

Also known as: manipulated topical anesthetics
sextant 4

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • eligible individuals for the study were selected from those requiring SRP with at least 2 experimental teeth in four of the six sextants.
  • each experimental teeth had to present ≥ 1 site with probing depth ≥ 5 mm associated with BP after treatment of gingivitis (without marginal bleeding).
  • furthermore, individual should present ≥ 18 years-old, have not ever done periodontal treatment and be able to understand Verbal Scale (VS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

You may not qualify if:

  • patients that related allergy history or sensitivity reaction to any used amide or ester anesthetics form,
  • who received anesthesia or sedation 12 hours before SRP,
  • who presented ulcerated lesions or abscesses in the oral cavity,
  • who presented oral pathologies with immediate surgical,
  • who had prior abuse alcohol history, pregnant women,
  • who presented uncontrolled hypertension or
  • who had participated in a clinical trial of investigational drug before four months from the beginning of this study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain, Postoperative

Interventions

Lidocaine, Prilocaine Drug CombinationBenzocaine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

LidocaineAcetanilidesAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsPrilocaineAniline CompoundsAminesDrug CombinationsPharmaceutical Preparationspara-AminobenzoatesAminobenzoatesBenzoatesAcids, CarbocyclicCarboxylic AcidsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbons

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Topical intrapocket anesthesia with prilocaine and lidocaine as an alternative to injectable anesthesia during scaling and root planing - A randomized clinical trial

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2013

First Posted

May 22, 2013

Study Start

June 1, 2010

Primary Completion

March 1, 2012

Study Completion

March 1, 2012

Last Updated

May 22, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-05