EMLA Topical Anesthetic During Scaling and Root Planing
Topical Intrapocket Anesthesia With Prilocaine and Lidocaine as Alternative to Injectable Anesthesia During Scaling and Root Planing - A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
32
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Injectable anesthesics previous to subgingival scaling and root planing (SRP) presents some disadvantages like fear of the needle insertion, long-lasting effect and prolonged dampening of adjacent tissues. This study will compare the intrapocket anesthetic effectiveness of a skin topical anesthesic EMLA with intrapocket 2% benzocaine, intrapocket placebo and injectable anaesthesia for SRP in a Split-mouth, double-blind, clinical trial study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2010
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 8, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 22, 2013
CompletedMay 22, 2013
May 1, 2013
1.8 years
May 8, 2013
May 18, 2013
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain and discomfort
For each experimental tooth, the patient was asked to indicate the intensity of pain and discomfort experienced intraoperatively using the VAS (VAStrans) (5 minutes after the start of the instrumentation in each tooth) and postoperatively (VASpost) immediately after the end of instrumentation of the respective tooth. At the end of the procedure, the patient was asked to also describe the pain sensation of the tooth using VS as: no pain (0), mild pain (1), moderate pain (2), severe pain (3), or extremely severe pain (4).
For each tooth was evaluated intraoperative pain using the Visual Analog Scale (5 minutes after the start of the instrumentation) and postoperative immediately after instrumentation. At the end of the procedure, was asked Verbal Scale, for 4 weeks.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Patient satisfaction with anesthesia
Determined at the end of all treatment sessions, for 4 weeks.
Injectable anesthetic requirement
If pain persisted after this second application, then an anesthesia infiltration/block was performed, for 4 weeks.
Adverse Events
Determined when each patient returned for the next treatment session, for 4 weeks.
Study Arms (4)
sextant 1
EXPERIMENTALTreatment with subgingival scaling and root planing was done in 6 weekly sessions, being the sextant 1 in the randomization for experimental procedures (EMLA)
sextant 2
ACTIVE COMPARATORTreatment with subgingival scaling and root planing was done in 6 weekly sessions, being the sextant 1 in the randomization for experimental procedures (Injectable anesthesia)
sextant 3
ACTIVE COMPARATORTreatment with subgingival scaling and root planing was done in 6 weekly sessions, being the sextant 1 in the randomization for experimental procedures (2% Benzocaine)
sextant 4
PLACEBO COMPARATORTreatment with subgingival scaling and root planing was done in 6 weekly sessions, being the sextant 1 in the randomization for experimental procedures (Placebo)
Interventions
% eutectic mixture of 25mg/g lidocaine and 25 mg/g of prilocaine
Injectable anesthesia 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100.000
Topical anesthetic - 200mg/g of 2% benzocaine
Manipulated with the same appearance and viscosity of topical anesthetics mentioned above
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- eligible individuals for the study were selected from those requiring SRP with at least 2 experimental teeth in four of the six sextants.
- each experimental teeth had to present ≥ 1 site with probing depth ≥ 5 mm associated with BP after treatment of gingivitis (without marginal bleeding).
- furthermore, individual should present ≥ 18 years-old, have not ever done periodontal treatment and be able to understand Verbal Scale (VS) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
You may not qualify if:
- patients that related allergy history or sensitivity reaction to any used amide or ester anesthetics form,
- who received anesthesia or sedation 12 hours before SRP,
- who presented ulcerated lesions or abscesses in the oral cavity,
- who presented oral pathologies with immediate surgical,
- who had prior abuse alcohol history, pregnant women,
- who presented uncontrolled hypertension or
- who had participated in a clinical trial of investigational drug before four months from the beginning of this study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Topical intrapocket anesthesia with prilocaine and lidocaine as an alternative to injectable anesthesia during scaling and root planing - A randomized clinical trial
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2013
First Posted
May 22, 2013
Study Start
June 1, 2010
Primary Completion
March 1, 2012
Study Completion
March 1, 2012
Last Updated
May 22, 2013
Record last verified: 2013-05