Navigation From Community to Clinic to Promote CRC Screening in Underserved Populations
2 other identifiers
interventional
419
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of a two-phase intervention using "community-to-clinic navigators" to guide individuals from an especially hard-to-reach, multicultural, and underinsured population into primary care clinics and, subsequently, to track effects of the intervention on completion of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in clinics. A cost-effectiveness analysis will lay the foundation for further implementation and dissemination research. Aim 1: Test effectiveness of community group education + tailored navigation versus community group education only in increasing clinic attendance among low-income, multicultural Arizona residents, aged 50 to 75 yrs. Hypothesis 1: Individuals receiving group education classes + tailored navigation will show higher rates of clinic attendance than those receiving only group education. \* As a separate critical step for those who make clinic appointments, the investigators will examine the effect on follow through to screening, using initial group assignment as a control variable in analysis. Patients making clinic appointments will receive referral for screening and tailored navigation as usual care. Aim 2: Track outcomes of the Phase I intervention on CRC screening test completion among low-income, multicultural Arizona residents aged 50 to 75 years who attend clinic. Hypothesis 2: Individuals receiving group classes and tailored navigation during Phase I will have higher rates of CRC screening test completion than those receiving classes only, (however this outcome will be primarily due to clinic attendance). Aim 3: Determine the cost-effectiveness of each phase of the interventions on increasing CRC screening completion among low-income, multicultural Arizona residents aged 50 to 75 years. Exploratory Aim 4: Examine the levels of program dissemination from community to clinic to final screenings using the RE-AIM model. Research Question 2: What is the degree of Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance of the community-to-clinic navigation, and clinic-to-screening outcomes?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
Started Apr 2012
Longer than P75 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 13, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 15, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 18, 2020
CompletedMay 11, 2021
April 1, 2021
4.7 years
May 13, 2013
August 2, 2019
April 14, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary Outcome is Clinic Attendance
Track outcomes of the Phase I intervention on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test completion among low-income, multicultural Arizona residents aged 50 to 75 years who attend clinic.
Attendance at the community educational class and 8 weeks beyond to attendance at a clinic.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
The Secondary Outcome is Participant Completion of a CRC Screening Test.
At 3- and 6-months post clinic visit, we will collect screening data from patient self-report and medical chart reviews.
Study Arms (2)
Tailored Navigation
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive tailored navigation phone calls to assist them with barriers in making a clinic appointment or attending the clinic. The tailored navigation intervention protocol will be used to guide individuals from an especially hard-to-reach, multicultural, and underinsured population into primary care clinics and, subsequently, track the effects of this intervention through a clinic navigation program to complete Colorectal cancer screening.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants in the control arm will receive phone calls to support data collection and tracking, but not receive tailored messages
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- participants will be aged 50-75,
- speak either English or Spanish,
- live in low-income neighborhoods (including a range of race and ethnicity),
- are due for CRC screening,
- may be at average or high risk for CRC,
- either will not identify a regular clinic they attend or will be registered (or identify) with one of the clinic systems engaged in our study. Those who do identify a clinic home, however, will also be encouraged to join the study as long as they are due for screening.
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals who are compliant with CRC screening guidelines will not be eligible.
- While we will not intentionally exclude any specific racial/ethnic group, our study materials are offered in Spanish and English. As such, anyone who does cannot speak, read, and write English or Spanish will not be eligible to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Arizona State Universitylead
- Mayo Cliniccollaborator
- University of Arizonacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Arizona State University
Phoenix, Arizona, 85048, United States
Related Publications (3)
Kim JH, Menon U. Pre- and postintervention differences in acculturation, knowledge, beliefs, and stages of readiness for mammograms among Korean American women. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009 Mar;36(2):E80-92. doi: 10.1188/09.onf.e80-e92.
PMID: 19273397BACKGROUNDHerman PM, Bucho-Gonzalez J, Menon U, Szalacha LA, Larkey L. Cost-Effectiveness of Community-to-Clinic Tailored Navigation for Colorectal Cancer Screening in an Underserved Population: Economic Evaluation Alongside a Group-Randomized Trial. Am J Health Promot. 2022 May;36(4):678-686. doi: 10.1177/08901171211068454. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
PMID: 35081762DERIVEDMenon U, Szalacha LA, Kue J, Herman PM, Bucho-Gonzalez J, Lance P, Larkey L. Effects of a Community-to-Clinic Navigation Intervention on Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Underserved People. Ann Behav Med. 2020 Apr 20;54(5):308-319. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaz049.
PMID: 31676898DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Professor, College of Nursing and Health Innovation
- Organization
- Arizona State University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
LInda K Larkey, PhD
Arizona State University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 13, 2013
First Posted
May 15, 2013
Study Start
April 1, 2012
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
March 31, 2017
Last Updated
May 11, 2021
Results First Posted
January 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2021-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share