NCT01853774

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to test the effectiveness of a two-phase intervention using "community-to-clinic navigators" to guide individuals from an especially hard-to-reach, multicultural, and underinsured population into primary care clinics and, subsequently, to track effects of the intervention on completion of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in clinics. A cost-effectiveness analysis will lay the foundation for further implementation and dissemination research. Aim 1: Test effectiveness of community group education + tailored navigation versus community group education only in increasing clinic attendance among low-income, multicultural Arizona residents, aged 50 to 75 yrs. Hypothesis 1: Individuals receiving group education classes + tailored navigation will show higher rates of clinic attendance than those receiving only group education. \* As a separate critical step for those who make clinic appointments, the investigators will examine the effect on follow through to screening, using initial group assignment as a control variable in analysis. Patients making clinic appointments will receive referral for screening and tailored navigation as usual care. Aim 2: Track outcomes of the Phase I intervention on CRC screening test completion among low-income, multicultural Arizona residents aged 50 to 75 years who attend clinic. Hypothesis 2: Individuals receiving group classes and tailored navigation during Phase I will have higher rates of CRC screening test completion than those receiving classes only, (however this outcome will be primarily due to clinic attendance). Aim 3: Determine the cost-effectiveness of each phase of the interventions on increasing CRC screening completion among low-income, multicultural Arizona residents aged 50 to 75 years. Exploratory Aim 4: Examine the levels of program dissemination from community to clinic to final screenings using the RE-AIM model. Research Question 2: What is the degree of Reach, Efficacy, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance of the community-to-clinic navigation, and clinic-to-screening outcomes?

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
419

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2012

Longer than P75 for not_applicable colorectal-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2012

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 13, 2013

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 15, 2013

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2016

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 31, 2017

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 18, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

May 11, 2021

Status Verified

April 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

4.7 years

First QC Date

May 13, 2013

Results QC Date

August 2, 2019

Last Update Submit

April 14, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Tailored navigationTailored messages

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Primary Outcome is Clinic Attendance

    Track outcomes of the Phase I intervention on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test completion among low-income, multicultural Arizona residents aged 50 to 75 years who attend clinic.

    Attendance at the community educational class and 8 weeks beyond to attendance at a clinic.

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • The Secondary Outcome is Participant Completion of a CRC Screening Test.

    At 3- and 6-months post clinic visit, we will collect screening data from patient self-report and medical chart reviews.

Study Arms (2)

Tailored Navigation

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will receive tailored navigation phone calls to assist them with barriers in making a clinic appointment or attending the clinic. The tailored navigation intervention protocol will be used to guide individuals from an especially hard-to-reach, multicultural, and underinsured population into primary care clinics and, subsequently, track the effects of this intervention through a clinic navigation program to complete Colorectal cancer screening.

Behavioral: Tailored navigation

Control

NO INTERVENTION

Participants in the control arm will receive phone calls to support data collection and tracking, but not receive tailored messages

Interventions

Also known as: Tailored messages
Tailored Navigation

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • participants will be aged 50-75,
  • speak either English or Spanish,
  • live in low-income neighborhoods (including a range of race and ethnicity),
  • are due for CRC screening,
  • may be at average or high risk for CRC,
  • either will not identify a regular clinic they attend or will be registered (or identify) with one of the clinic systems engaged in our study. Those who do identify a clinic home, however, will also be encouraged to join the study as long as they are due for screening.

You may not qualify if:

  • Individuals who are compliant with CRC screening guidelines will not be eligible.
  • While we will not intentionally exclude any specific racial/ethnic group, our study materials are offered in Spanish and English. As such, anyone who does cannot speak, read, and write English or Spanish will not be eligible to participate in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Arizona State University

Phoenix, Arizona, 85048, United States

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Kim JH, Menon U. Pre- and postintervention differences in acculturation, knowledge, beliefs, and stages of readiness for mammograms among Korean American women. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009 Mar;36(2):E80-92. doi: 10.1188/09.onf.e80-e92.

    PMID: 19273397BACKGROUND
  • Herman PM, Bucho-Gonzalez J, Menon U, Szalacha LA, Larkey L. Cost-Effectiveness of Community-to-Clinic Tailored Navigation for Colorectal Cancer Screening in an Underserved Population: Economic Evaluation Alongside a Group-Randomized Trial. Am J Health Promot. 2022 May;36(4):678-686. doi: 10.1177/08901171211068454. Epub 2022 Jan 27.

  • Menon U, Szalacha LA, Kue J, Herman PM, Bucho-Gonzalez J, Lance P, Larkey L. Effects of a Community-to-Clinic Navigation Intervention on Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Underserved People. Ann Behav Med. 2020 Apr 20;54(5):308-319. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaz049.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesColonic DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesRectal Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Professor, College of Nursing and Health Innovation
Organization
Arizona State University

Study Officials

  • LInda K Larkey, PhD

    Arizona State University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 13, 2013

First Posted

May 15, 2013

Study Start

April 1, 2012

Primary Completion

December 1, 2016

Study Completion

March 31, 2017

Last Updated

May 11, 2021

Results First Posted

January 18, 2020

Record last verified: 2021-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations