Study Stopped
required documentation too onerous
Exparel vs. Standard Bupivicaine for Abdominoplasty
Is Liposomal Injection Bupivacaine (Exparel) Superior to Standard Bupivacaine for Abdominoplasty? A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
4
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Background \& study question: Strategies for post-operative pain control that make use of various different types of medicines are advantageous both for patient comfort and for minimizing the use of opioid pain medicines and their associated side effects, which include drowsiness, nausea, and vomiting. A key element of these strategies is wound injection with local anesthetic (numbing medicine) at the time of surgery. Local numbing procedures are used routinely in patients undergoing abdominoplasty (tummy tuck), most often with lidocaine or bupivacaine, which can last several hours. Multiple studies have shown that locally injected pain medicines achieve better pain control, less opioid use, and faster return to normal activities, such that the use of one of these local anesthetic medicines is the current standard of care. Exparel is an extended-release formulation of bupivacaine that can produce local pain relief for up to 72 hours. Studies have shown it to provide better post-operative pain control and decreased use of opioid medications when compared to patients who did not receive any local numbing agents. Exparel has been used successfully in a variety of surgical settings, including open colon surgery, laparoscopic gall bladder removal, abdominoplasty, and breast augmentation. Its effectiveness has by and large been established in comparison to no local anesthetic. In this study, we seek to investigate the benefit of Exparel compared to standard bupivacaine infiltration in patients undergoing abdominoplasty. Study design: Patients scheduled for abdominoplasty with the lead investigator will be offered inclusion in this study. Consenting patients will be randomly assigned to standard bupivacaine or Exparel by coin toss after their clinic visit. On the day of surgery, the only difference between patients assigned to one arm or the other is the local anesthetic used. The surgery itself and plan for general anesthesia will be similar. Both groups will have the same pain medicines available after surgery. Patients will be given a form on which to record twice-daily pain ratings and opioid narcotic needs for 3 days after surgery. For patients admitted after surgery, oral and IV narcotic use will be collected from their inpatient medical record. The primary outcome of interest is daily and cumulative pain scores through 3 days. A secondary endpoint is daily and total opioid use over 3 days. Additional measures include the time to first post-operative use of opioid medication and incidence of any adverse side effects.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started May 2013
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 10, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 14, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 3, 2014
CompletedNovember 3, 2014
October 1, 2014
1.2 years
May 10, 2013
October 29, 2014
October 29, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain Score, Visual Analogue Pain Scores
Continuous Visual Analogue Scale 0 - 10 (0=no pain, 10=worst imaginable pain. Patients will complete a log of pain levels experienced each morning and evening for 3 days. Score is 0-10 on a visual analog scale.
3 days
Study Arms (2)
Liposomal injection bupivicaine (Exparel)
EXPERIMENTALPatients will have the maximum approved dose of Exparel, 266 mg, diluted in 20 mL normal saline, infiltrated into the rectus fascia and subcutaneous tissues at the time of abdominoplasty.
Standard bupivicaine
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive the maximum safe allowance of 0.25% bupivacaine, or 1.5 mg/kg (eg. 150 mg or 60 mL for a 100 kg patient) infiltrated into the rectus fascia and subcutaneous tissues at the time of abdominoplasty.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adult men and women
- scheduled for abdominoplasty
You may not qualify if:
- pregnant women
- patients with allergy to amide-type local anesthetics
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Emory Universitylead
Study Sites (3)
Emory University Hospital Midtown
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308, United States
Emory University Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
Emory Aesthetic Center at Paces
Atlanta, Georgia, 30327, United States
Related Publications (5)
Gorfine SR, Onel E, Patou G, Krivokapic ZV. Bupivacaine extended-release liposome injection for prolonged postsurgical analgesia in patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Dec;54(12):1552-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e318232d4c1.
PMID: 22067185BACKGROUNDHaas E, Onel E, Miller H, Ragupathi M, White PF. A double-blind, randomized, active-controlled study for post-hemorrhoidectomy pain management with liposome bupivacaine, a novel local analgesic formulation. Am Surg. 2012 May;78(5):574-81. doi: 10.1177/000313481207800540.
PMID: 22546131BACKGROUNDDasta J, Ramamoorthy S, Patou G, Sinatra R. Bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension compared with bupivacaine HCl for the reduction of opioid burden in the postsurgical setting. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Oct;28(10):1609-15. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.721760. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
PMID: 22900785BACKGROUNDChavez-Abraham V, Barr JS, Zwiebel PC. The efficacy of a lidocaine-infused pain pump for postoperative analgesia following elective augmentation mammaplasty or abdominoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011 Aug;35(4):463-9. doi: 10.1007/s00266-010-9633-4. Epub 2010 Dec 7.
PMID: 21136251BACKGROUNDFeng LJ. Painless abdominoplasty: the efficacy of combined intercostal and pararectus blocks in reducing postoperative pain and recovery time. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Nov;126(5):1723-1732. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ef8fe5.
PMID: 21042130BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Trial terminated prior to any meaningful patient accrual so no analysis performed.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Albert Losken MD
- Organization
- Emory University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Albert Losken, MD
Emory University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Division of Plastic Surgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 10, 2013
First Posted
May 14, 2013
Study Start
May 1, 2013
Primary Completion
July 1, 2014
Study Completion
July 1, 2014
Last Updated
November 3, 2014
Results First Posted
November 3, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-10